A lawyer argued that mass riots triggered by Trump's power grab could be crushed by US troops: indictment

[moe]

If a coup is your thing, it's good to have a plan.

A lawyer argued that mass riots triggered by Trump's power grab could be crushed by US troops: indictment

As Donald Trump tried to remain in power following his 2020 election loss, some lawyers tried to dissuade him.

In a conversation on January 3, 2021 — days before Congress was set to certify now-President Joe Biden as the victor of the 2020 election — one deputy White House counsel had a warning.

He said that, if Trump remained in office on inauguration day, "there would be riots in every major city in the United States."


But Jeffrey Clark, a top Justice Department lawyer at the time — and who the new indictment against Trump alleges was a co-conspirator — had a different answer: Call in the troops.

"That's why there's an Insurrection Act," Clark responded to the deputy White House counsel, according to the indictment against Trump unsealed by a federal grand jury in Washington, DC, on Thursday.

The law, which has been invoked only a handful of times in the past century, authorizes the president to order the military to quell unrest within the United States.

 

[ThePunish-EER]

If a coup is your thing, it's good to have a plan.

A lawyer argued that mass riots triggered by Trump's power grab could be crushed by US troops: indictment

As Donald Trump tried to remain in power following his 2020 election loss, some lawyers tried to dissuade him.

In a conversation on January 3, 2021 — days before Congress was set to certify now-President Joe Biden as the victor of the 2020 election — one deputy White House counsel had a warning.

He said that, if Trump remained in office on inauguration day, "there would be riots in every major city in the United States."


But Jeffrey Clark, a top Justice Department lawyer at the time — and who the new indictment against Trump alleges was a co-conspirator — had a different answer: Call in the troops.

"That's why there's an Insurrection Act," Clark responded to the deputy White House counsel, according to the indictment against Trump unsealed by a federal grand jury in Washington, DC, on Thursday.

The law, which has been invoked only a handful of times in the past century, authorizes the president to order the military to quell unrest within the United States.

You seriously need an education. Smoking meth, unemployed, and fondling yourself is no way live.

 

[atlkvb]

If a coup is your thing, it's good to have a plan.

A lawyer argued that mass riots triggered by Trump's power grab could be crushed by US troops: indictment

As Donald Trump tried to remain in power following his 2020 election loss, some lawyers tried to dissuade him.

In a conversation on January 3, 2021 — days before Congress was set to certify now-President Joe Biden as the victor of the 2020 election — one deputy White House counsel had a warning.

He said that, if Trump remained in office on inauguration day, "there would be riots in every major city in the United States."


But Jeffrey Clark, a top Justice Department lawyer at the time — and who the new indictment against Trump alleges was a co-conspirator — had a different answer: Call in the troops.

"That's why there's an Insurrection Act," Clark responded to the deputy White House counsel, according to the indictment against Trump unsealed by a federal grand jury in Washington, DC, on Thursday.

The law, which has been invoked only a handful of times in the past century, authorizes the president to order the military to quell unrest within the United States.

No one advised Trump to call in the troops so he could remain in power. My Lord you are one sick individual!

 

[atlkvb]

Hey @moe ...serious question for 'ya. If Trump's allegations of voter fraud were all bogus, is it safe to say there was no fraud anywhere? If that wasn't proven, where was it ever validated? (no fraud)

If there was fraud (logically there'd have to be if all of Trump's allegations were not bogus)...why wasn't Trump allowed to present those cases where he thought there was in fact fraud? If there was sufficient evidence indicating fraud in just those cases, why weren't those cases investigated exactly as Trump had been asking? If they had been investigated, how much of them would have caused a change in the outcome of the election? Some, none, not at all? (we actually don't know since nothing was ever fully investigated)

So, if we don't have the answers to those questions, why is Trump under indictment? What's the crime here?

This is the closest I can come to imagining what @moe actually looks like

 

[Soaring Eagle 74]

You seriously need an education. Smoking meth, unemployed, and fondling yourself is no way live.

Well, you would certainly know!

 

[Gunny46]

Mostly peaceful coup.


Thread 'Americans Must Watch This !' https://westvirginia.forums.rivals.com/threads/americans-must-watch-this.236199/

 

[Gunny46]

If a coup is your thing, it's good to have a plan.

A lawyer argued that mass riots triggered by Trump's power grab could be crushed by US troops: indictment

As Donald Trump tried to remain in power following his 2020 election loss, some lawyers tried to dissuade him.

In a conversation on January 3, 2021 — days before Congress was set to certify now-President Joe Biden as the victor of the 2020 election — one deputy White House counsel had a warning.

He said that, if Trump remained in office on inauguration day, "there would be riots in every major city in the United States."


But Jeffrey Clark, a top Justice Department lawyer at the time — and who the new indictment against Trump alleges was a co-conspirator — had a different answer: Call in the troops.

"That's why there's an Insurrection Act," Clark responded to the deputy White House counsel, according to the indictment against Trump unsealed by a federal grand jury in Washington, DC, on Thursday.

The law, which has been invoked only a handful of times in the past century, authorizes the president to order the military to quell unrest within the United States.

Be quiet fool.

 

[Snuffy Smif]

Moe is so proud of Biden's economy where the poor can't afford food now or gas to go to work.

If a coup is your thing, it's good to have a plan.

A lawyer argued that mass riots triggered by Trump's power grab could be crushed by US troops: indictment

As Donald Trump tried to remain in power following his 2020 election loss, some lawyers tried to dissuade him.

In a conversation on January 3, 2021 — days before Congress was set to certify now-President Joe Biden as the victor of the 2020 election — one deputy White House counsel had a warning.

He said that, if Trump remained in office on inauguration day, "there would be riots in every major city in the United States."


But Jeffrey Clark, a top Justice Department lawyer at the time — and who the new indictment against Trump alleges was a co-conspirator — had a different answer: Call in the troops.

"That's why there's an Insurrection Act," Clark responded to the deputy White House counsel, according to the indictment against Trump unsealed by a federal grand jury in Washington, DC, on Thursday.

The law, which has been invoked only a handful of times in the past century, authorizes the president to order the military to quell unrest within the United States.

Well, when Trump won in 2016, there were riots by the left in "every major city," dipshit.