24 Sex allegations that CNN ignored
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
Now regularly on here almost every day you have moe or RPJ or Mountaineer WV or country trying to point how hypocritical Christians or Conservatives are about sexual misconduct.
They are certainly free to do so and in some cases the criticism is warranted.
But they have no credibility when they complain about sexual impurity among our elected representatives and ignore this mountain of misconduct among their own party as listed in your link.
I posted the other day this is all political. They (Left) do not really care about all of these sexual indiscretions. They are only using one of our most effective criticisms of them from the Right against us to try and defeat us politically.
Ironically they are making our case against them by their refusal to speak out against the very sexual misconduct on their own side they so quickly point out on our side.
Frauds.
Last edited:
notice how silent they are when their asses are handed to them?
lol consider the source. what a bunch of nobodies, any county commissioners or assistant principals?
not that i give 2 shytes either way but did foxnews cover these? (link wasn't working for me just now)
Doubtful. However, it’s not really the point of pointing out CNNs politically motivated hypocrisy.
Why did I laugh at that?
(because it was funny)
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
I can't tell you not to say what you do Dave...and you and I are certainly on the same side of the fence against the Socialists...but that's not my style. I can't help that it's funny though...actually I'm surprised more Leftists have me on ignore than you! Guess they like getting what they usually are first to dish out?
I just like to shut them up...after they've hurled their insults. While you like to throw it right back at them. They come back for more from you...and run away from me.
Oh well.
Imagine that? Not a Conservative among them. Did Moore check their politics 40 years ago before he asked to sign their yearbooks?
Asking another question to avoid answering or recognizing one you don't like eh boom?
Fox has covered BOTH stories. Only CNN has ignored the Liberal Democrats. Don't tell boom that though...only Fox is biased...CNN covers the world
Libs want so badly to believe they are more intelligent than those who disagree with them. I remind them they are essentially no different than those they claim to loathe. It kills them and they simply cannot just let it go.Why did I laugh at that?
(because it was funny)
I can't tell you not to say what you do Dave...and you and I are certainly on the same side of the fence against the Socialists...but that's not my style. I can't help that it's funny though...actually I'm surprised more Leftists have me on ignore than you! Guess they like getting what they usually are first to dish out?
I just like to shut them up...after they've hurled their insults. While you like to throw it right back at them. They come back for more from you...and run away from me.
Oh well.
How would you know? There is no God right RPJ? How can he be a hypocrite of something (or someone ie: Jesus) who doesn't even exist?
That's just loopy.
Religion shaming from an atheist. The height of hypocrisy.
Yet they do not ignore you and avoid me like Herpes. It's cool. Tells me I've gotten to them.
"Well I'm just not going to talk with YOU anymore...because you're just too damn stupid to have a conversation with")
OK...bye.
Exactly! Calling someone who believes in a non existent being a hypocrite. That's rich!
Doc has said in many occasion that he loathes christians because they try to push their idea of morality on others. He doesnt seem to mind trying to push his ideas on people apparently. Doc is the pucture in the encyclopedia beside the descriotion of a hypocrite.
That reminds me that Trump defeated Hillary when you said she was a lock and would win in a landslide. You have no shame just like Hillary.
Really? I think you just have no clue how annoying your posts and “debate” is to others. I bet even your circle jerk buddies think the same at times, even if they don’t tell you.
Nope just you Lefties who run off when you can't answer a simple question like who creates and owns wealth boomer?
Silence of the Lambs.
I have a challenge for you boomer to prove I'm a jerk and ask annyoing questions the Left can't answer.
If you are brave enough and willing I bet I can ask you a series of questions...let's say as many as a dozen about what you believe or follow on the Left that you will either refuse to answer, can't answer, or don't know the answer.
The ones you refuse to answer will be because it exposes your Leftist credentials, and therefore the intellectual bankruptcy of your Leftist ideas.
The ones you can't answer will be the ones you are afraid to admit as the Truth of your Leftist lies
And the ones you simply do not know the answer to will be the ones your political philosophy has no answer for.
So prove me wrong and take my challenge.
See.....annoying. I wish someone would on the right would confirm this simple fact.
Fvck it. Fine.....I don’t know how answering your questions proves you’re an annoying jerk, but whatever....go ahead and ask em
Yes. You asked if Fox is not biased after OP pointed out CNN's bias by not reporting on all of those Dems charged with sexual harassment. Suggesting Fox picks its stories to smear Dems and CNN does not do that to Republicans.
Fox covered both stories(Moore and the Dems) CNN ignored the Democrats.
You blamed only Fox for bias.
OK great. We'll go one at a time until you either quit, get mad at me and call me names or refuse to answer because you don't like the question. We'll see.
First question
The Left likes to say " the rich" don't pay their fare share of the tax burden. Do you agree with that and do you know what that is among say the top 10 percent of wage earners?
If you agree they are paying a fair share why does the Left insist they don't?
If you agree they should be paying more of the total tax burden can you tell the board how much more that should be above what they are paying currently?
Last edited:
I assume you are trying to suck me at not some type of debate about the tenets of socialism.
Generalized “wealth” (by your economic definition) is created by profit remaining after costs are subtracted from revenue in the transaction of goods or services. The organization or individual that creates the “wealth” owns it.
Incomplete Professor boomer. While it is true a portion of wealth is generated after goods and services are sold those profits are usually and normally plowed back into the enterprise to further grow the business or develop new products and better services.
True net worth is calculated by the sum total all liquid assets...which can be either sold or invested. Individuals holding wealth actually own it, but they usually use it as leverage to generate more liquid assets and thus those are also owned by individuals or institutional investors also seeking to expand their wealth generating portfolios in which dividends are paid which adds more liquid assets and thus more wealth to be reinvested or sold.
Corporations are simply a collection of like minded investors seeking to expand wealth among all risk takers who share in the profits generated and use that money to generate more wealth.
Last edited:
1) It’s not as clear of a question, for me, than you present it to be actually. But I’ll give it a go.....
Defining “rich” is problematic. I don’t consider everyone in the 1% to be rich. Incomes over 1m per year is a little closer to the idea of what I consider to be rich. I think these incomes do pay their “fare share”, but only when you simply look at the numbers of how much of the total taxes the pay as a whole. I believe it’s somewhere like 15-20% of total taxes collected? That figure makes it seem like they are paying way more than their “fare share”.
For me, it’s more about the impact that a person’a Taxes has on their personal budget. So, I think the amount of taxes that everyone else should be substantially lower. However, I don’t think we should run a deficit, I don’t think we are in a position to cut cut cut either, and so I seek for the increase of taxes for those in the .01%.....basically because I personally believe they can afford it more. I’d rather we reappropriate the tax revenue we already collect in a more effective way for the greater good.
I believe this is a familiar talking point for the left, because the taxes on working and middle class families are too high, and prevent many from moving into a higher socio- economic class. And that problem doesn’t exist within the 1%......and there are a lot of problems that need solved.....and money is usually needed to solve them.
Professor boomer? Was that needed?
Did you ask me the definition of net worth? Or the definition of a corporation? Or how a business or individual expands their portfolio?
No. You asked me a generalized question about “wealth”.....I answered it.
And what does my post have to do with whether or not the post I replied to asked a question or not? Read the post I replied to....it didn’t ask a question. And neither did yours.
I’ll go even further and point out that the “investment” that you are referring to as wealth creation is just investment....the workers that earn their pay are creating their own “wealth” by providing the service to the employer and receiving their payment for it, the profit left after all the bills of living are paid is wealth....but it wasn’t created by the employer, it was created by the worker. The worker owns it.
