Right. The nfl wrote its rules to allow some political speech and not other speech which happens to be speech it disagrees with. Glad we cleared that up.Read.....their......rules.......PLEASE. Good grief.
BLM is NOT considered tied to a POLITICAL CANDIDATE or promoting/influencing votes for a particular candidate, while MAGA is 100% tied to a political candidate.
This really is pretty easy to understand. But your refusal to open your mind and read their rules is the problem.
I have used factual evidence to support the NFL stance, while you guys are using emotion.
Read.....their......rules.......PLEASE. Good grief.I didn’t say anything about Bosa. I don’t care what the nfl does. I don’t know why you think I am arguing anything.
It doesn’t matter what excuse you use. Players were not fined for sporting blm, a political slogan.
It is fun putting holes in all your nonsense.
I didn’t say anything about Bosa. I don’t care what the nfl does. I don’t know why you think I am arguing anything.1. I'm not arguing any "liberal point". I'm arguing against your point that Bosa was "treated differently" when the facts are, that I have presented, that he was treated the same as another LIBERAL player who wore headphones that were not NFL sponsors (Kaepernick).
2. BLM is a slogan that may be considered "liberal", but it isn't connected directly to a political person or candidate like "MAGA" is. Now if the BLM had "Vote Democrat", then I'd agree with you. But everyone knows that "MAGA" is Donald Trump, and the NFL has stated in their rules about political promotion in uniform.
Again, it isn't my fault that you guys are getting woke over this. It is a big nothing burger. The NFL has rules, like them or not, and they issued punishment that is on par with others who get fined for wearing unsanctioned shoes, socks, headphones, or any other products of promotion.