Kid's protesting climate change.
- Thread starter Walter Brennaneer
- Start date
Exploiting children? Um, no, she spoke at her own discretion and her own decision. Sad when a 16-year-old kid is more intelligent than grown-ass men.
Sure she did. No one fed her that bull$h!t, she did her homework, studied climate change without any influence from the agenda-pushing left, and made what she felt were factual statements, based on her own opinion(s)...
![[jumpingsmile]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/happy/happy0028.r191677.gif "Jumping Smile [jumpingsmile]")
Sure she did. No one fed her that bull$h!t, she did her homework, studied climate change without any influence from the agenda-pushing left, and made what she felt were factual statements, based on her own opinion(s)...
So teens cannot have the capacity to do such things? Who knew.......
Sure she did. No one fed her that bull$h!t, she did her homework, studied climate change without any influence from the agenda-pushing left, and made what she felt were factual statements, based on her own opinion(s)...
She has spoken all around the world, moron. You should probably be a little more educated.
Lots of people have talked all around the world, you name-calling liberal. Is that all you need from someone to believe what they say? Is there a rational liberal in the world?
What kind of moron thinks a 16 year old child speaks at her own discretion?
You would survive a zombie apocalypse because zombies feast on brains.
There is nothing to learn. We are all climate scientists technically.
lol, that ain't your demographic Trumpies, youth are so irritating, I hear they nominated Greta for the nnobel Peace prize, bet that makes Donnie boil, young lady has more class in her little finger than all the he men feeling threatened by her on here.
Not one post of evidence that indicates man made climate change is a myth, a hoax, or a swindle.
Not one scientific fact that man-made CO2 has a significant impact on climate change. Oceans are the world's largest producers of CO2 emissions. It is also impossible to account for all of the CO2 emissions emitted naturally. Somehow, you alarmists want us to believe that man is the cause. When there are scientific facts that show we are causing the extinction of Earth and that we can stop it, the global alarmists will have my attention.
The Green New Deal is about controlling the economy. Whatever you want to call that fiasco in DC was about anything but protesting Climate Change. I saw and heard that myself.
Perhaps you should hire a kid actor/poster for the board, maybe we'll believe them.
"I love the poorly educated."
-Donald J. Trump
You guys make him so proud. Congratulations idiots.
-Donald J. Trump
You guys make him so proud. Congratulations idiots.
So, did Alex Jones tell you this? Is he still looking for the child actors at Sandy Hook?
"Anti-abortion screwholes swear 16-year-old girls are young women who should be aware that actions have consequences, until a 16-year-old girl starts telling y'all about yourselves because the planet is on fire, and suddenly 16-year-old girls are children who know nothing?"
![[eyeroll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/rolleye/rolleye0011.r191677.gif "Eye roll [eyeroll]")
Says who? You? Show me the evidence of man's significant impact to climate change. Also the specific evidence that we can control the climate. If we were to emit zero emissions, there is no evidence that it would reverse what's going on now. We don't even know the level of man's impact. It could be insignificant. No one knows for sure one way or the other.
But let's panic, shut everything down, destroy our economy and move to socialism/communism/marxism...It works very well in China. They set the standard when it comes to CO2 emissions release.
Last edited:
I thought you were smarter. There are literally hundreds of studies that show man's carbon emissions are a contributing factor. You may choose to ignore it. You can call it fake science. But denying that these studies exist or there is no evidence is flat out incorrect. There is conflicting evidence. But there is evidence.
BTW, I am not sold on this being a man-made issue. But to deny that there is evidence is flat-out incorrect.
