He isnt waiting on anything. The process began months ago. Why do you lie?
Giuliani says Trump reimbursed Cohen for Stormy Daniels payment
- Thread starter moe
- Start date
Process? LOL.
Why doesn’t he sign an EO? He says he’s signed more than any other pres.
Bigly!
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
(sound familiar?)
That is a pretty bad attempt to excuse your own racist acts. I mean you were the one telling atl that he was wrong for believing what he did because of his race. By your own definition you just defined yourself as a racist. Better try harder.
You're not a Leftist/Socialist type? Well I certainly can't mistake you for a Conservative can I? You're "progressive" that sort captures it all...above everyone else mired in labels. The best from both worlds that about right boom?[cheers]
Geez, I guess I’d just have to cry in the corner then. Chubbs thinks I’m queer, oh god.
The fact that you would think that I would even think I know ANYTHING about your IQ is ridiculous to me.
I’m a believer in multiple intelligence theory. I think everyone has their areas where they excel and areas where they fall down.
I’m pretty dumb when it comes to math and economics - to the point where it’s embarrassing for me at times.
I think many things you say are dumb - and maybe I say that to you more than others on this board because YOU SAY SO MUCH MORE than even the frequent poster on this board. I know I have much more aggressiveness towards you than other posters, because you are (by your own admission) aggressive towards me.
You have a very simplistic and foolish way of looking at opinions that stand in contrast to your own - you lump them all together. To ask what EVERYONE on the left thinks about sex is dumb. Really dumb. I call it what it is. I could give a fvck about your race- I don’t think it applies at all.
I think your much smarter than me in areas of economics (that ain’t sayin much though), math, and Christianity. But you also need to realize that those assessments are taken from our limited interactions on a db, and it in no way can confirm any of those assessments as factual.
Grow the fvck up, and get over yourself.
Well duh. I mean Avenetti as a fixer worked for Rahm Emmanual for a while. I didnt even think this was in question.
With this post Dave extends his overall record against Countryroads to an impressive 1,287,987 - 0.
This is actually very good advice that if you go back and c-a-r-e-f-u-l-l-y read every line in your admonishment to me you'd be well advised to follow for yourself. Never exclude yourself from the elevated position over all else you place beneath you.
Come to think of it why is it that only YOU get to judge whose opinions are simplistic, foolish, or anything else you think doesn't measure up to your evaluations?
I have one word for that boom. It's called arrogance.
Even with that bit of self admission, you NEVER admit when you are wrong NEVER! We had a scrum recently where you insisted Progressive taxation is NOT income redistribution. Back and fourth we went...definitions, examples, even proving to you that income removed from one class at the expense of another is indeed redistributive, any way one chooses to define it and you certainly had many ways to define it. You STILL wouldn't admit you were wrong about that!
Who gets to make up their own definitions of economic facts then complain the person arguing simple fact is intolerant? That's what you do, and it freakin' drives me nuts. Facts are what YOU say they are, not what they actually are...and of course your facts are never wrong are they boom?
So if facts are whatever you say they are, that makes you a relativist...by fact.
I do...but I try to argue from positions of known quantities, identified and confirmed by either logic, history, or fact. I don't get to make up my own definitions on things. You do that ALL THE TIME.
This happened like months ago and the best the simpleton can come up with is that he was trolling everyone and in reality he trolled himself. Its just comical.
So if I make a statement (as I have in the past) that there are no successful long lasting ongoing Socialist run Governments in history, you and others I've had that scrum with immediately start mixing and matching your own definitions of what a Socialist economy actually is!
Well you can never lose the debate if any definition of Socialism counts can you? But isolate the argument to a single Socialist run command and control economy where the State is in control of all aspects of the country's GDP.
You cannot find one successful ongoing experiment of that anywhere in the history of the planet since that discredited ideology was fostered upon us somewhere around the turn of the 20th century. It is an unmitigated failure as judged by its history, facts, and simple logic wherever it's been instituted!
But you and others who defend it will parse, and demur, and bifurcate, and otherwise argue varying definitions of Socialist programs or Socialist dogma in your attempts to get around that ideology's historical documented failure wherever and whenever it has been attempted as the alternative to free markets and Capitalism.
It's incredibly frustrating. The world doesn't operate in relative terms. Planes that don't have the proper lift crash. Raw food not cooked to proper specs will make you sick. And a political ideology that runs counter to the Human Spirit and yearning to be Free will ultimately fail as Socialism always has.
However in your relativistic world, it just hasn't been massaged enough with the proper "mix" of Progressive adaptations to make it Goldilocks perfect.
I'm often called stupid and dumb too so that one doesn't really cause my jock strap to constrict.
Your Bullsh1t is old, it’s not really effective, and it’s obvious to many on here.
Hey boom let's say you had your pick of THE Socialist paradise currently running you'd prefer to live in since you are devoted to 'Democratic Social Progressivism'...where would it be and why?
Use any definition of it currently operating in perfection as you see it and tell us where that would be? It can't be America because that orange colored carnival barker you're mocking in this post is systematically dismantling what you Leftists have erected here as your own Socialist edifice to Leviathan, so you have to pick someplace else. We're tearing down what it's already destroyed here in the USA.
So where would that be and why?
I always know when I got you when you can't answer
![[winking]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/wink.r191677.gif "Winking [winking]")
. However I'm making enough money now selling big giant gas guzzling Light Trucks and SUV's to send your Democratic Progressive Socialist Leftist ass to wherever that paradise is you can't identify just so you can be happy there and practicing your brand of socialististic progressive relativistic utopia. Just let me know where it is, and how much you'll need to get there and I'll pay for your one-way ticket. OK boomer?
Imagine how much better it would be for the cops if all criminals obeyed the law? Ban guns. Think criminals would care? They don't where they are already banned, so what good will banning them for law abiding citizens do except leave the criminals facing unarmed victims?
Science doesn't describe a DNA strand as a "clump of cells". In fact, it is more complex and intricately designed than all of the latest most sophisticated computers combined! Stretched end to end, the information contained on one DNA strand for one Human being would travel from the Earth to the Sun and back! It is so intricate, and so complex, it cannot be duplicated, and never has been! Billions upon billions of human beings throughout World history and no two are ever created with the exact same DNA! How you can scientifically call that just a "clump of cells" is not only non scientific, it is illogical and wholly devoid of any semblance of intellectual equality because Humans are clueless to fully understand it or re-create it. Yet you demean its scientific authenticity by describing the primary identifier of a Baby as "just a clump of cells". Are you scientifically ignorant, or simply ignorant in your claim to be scientific?
excerpt:
"So the probability that two different people have the same set of mutations, just in this set of common mutations, is 0.99^990,000 * 0.01^10,000 which is an astronomically tiny number. You have a better shot of randomly choosing the same atom in the known universe twice than you do of having two different people getting the same set of mutations twice."
(but it's a just a clump of cells)
How unique is our DNA?
https://www.quora.com/How-unique-is-our-DNA
Last edited:
Then why does everyone on the Left insist Trump is a sexual reprobate and liar who must go? Who on the Left doesn't believe this?
Some?
I don't know any Religious folks who are "socially liberal" and think it's OK to have extra marital affairs. I don't know any women who do either.This wasn't the argument the Left used to justify Clinton's infidelity to Hillary. It was simply "it's only about Sex, so who cares"? If this is the Left's standard, why is Trump's sexual relationship within his Marriage the exception? Why doesn't the Left hold out the exact same standard for Trump they did for Clinton?
Since you admit here that a politician lying to protect his image is not unique to Trump, I'm not even sure why this was posted?
Again, why is he held to a different standard than any other politician who does the same thing?This is not what the Left says. They're claiming moral hypocrisy among Trump's supporters for not holding him to the same standards they've demanded in others. However the Left is doing the exact same thing...holding Trump to a standard of morality they've excused away in others.(like Clinton) Hypocrites on the Left calling others hypocrites are hypocrites themselves.
But you're not complaining just about the Sex, you're complaining about his lying and his immorality as a result of it, insisting he can't be trusted, is a liar like we've never seen, and wholly insincere as a so called Christian who refuses to practice what he preaches along with his supporters correct?
So if he and his supporters are held to that standard by the Left, why is it that Leftists who also claim to be Christian can advocate for Abortion and not be viewed by Pro Life Christians as having the same two faced insincerity about their Faith as the Left places on Trump? Why are Trump's supporters the only hypocrites?
Last edited:
Me? Stop generalizing. I could care less who or what he sleeps with before or while in office. I don’t know why they keep stepping on their dicks trying to cover it up. Own up to it and move on. It just makes you wonder if they aren’t trying to hide other stuff that is much worse.
Generalizing is the only way he can “win” his little “scrums” - as he calls them- evidently a large portion of his self confidence is based on these digital victories of intellectual delusional dominance
Really I just get amused watching you folks twist and turn avoiding questions that expose your mental banality.
Like you Boomer arguing that progressive taxation straight out of Mein Kampf is not income redistribution.
Or that scientist CPeer arguing that a human DNA strand is just a clump of cells.
Brilliant.
Last edited:
Well at least according to the media and his critics talks for the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula aren't as important are they?
