That would be on the jury.It's a shame if he's convicted. The reason for conviction would to appease the mob and to avoid rioting, justice be damned.
@SoCo what precluded Chauvin from requesting a bench trial?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be on the jury.It's a shame if he's convicted. The reason for conviction would to appease the mob and to avoid rioting, justice be damned.
Nothing, unless there is a MN law limiting the use of those.
Ahhhhh, makes sense. I wasn’t aware that’s how MN seated judges. I assumed he was appointed.Nothing, unless there is a MN law limiting the use of those.
The problem is the judge is far more likely to cave to political and public pressure than a jury. Jurors can hide behind some anonymity which presumably allows them to decide without fear of repercussions from the community. Then factor in Minnesota elects their judges just like WV, which is the dumbest way to select judges on the planet. I would never consider putting a high profile case before an elected judge.
Legal InsurrectionSomething seems fishy. There is no reason for the prosecution to call either of these witnesses. Any evidence useful to the prosecution from them could have been obtained from its previous witnesses. It only serves to provide the defense the opportunity to further its points. Where are these recaps coming from Rog?
He is not accurate. The feds could step in and charge him. It would take the prosecutors, both sate and federal, to immunize him. We know the Feds won't because they want to push the same narrative the media is pushing. WHITE MAN BAD.
It could also be "I ain't do no drugs". Which is what he repeatedly told the officers since the moment they arrived on scene. If the prosecutors didn't follow up on that witness, they aren't doing their jobs. Which would seem to confirm DvlDog's suspicion about the dog and pony show from the prosecutors.Another State's witness
Nelson: Attempt to understand and hear what various parties are saying? Hear Floyd say, I ate too many drugs?
Reyerson: No.
Nelson: Publish Exhibit 1007, listen to Floyd voice.
Nelson plays that statement again.
Nelson: Appear that Floyd said I ate too many drugs?
Reyerson: Yes, it did.
Remember, Reyerson is a STATE witness.
Prosecution did not to this point re-direct on this.It could also be "I ain't do no drugs". Which is what he repeatedly told the officers since the moment they arrived on scene. If the prosecutors didn't follow up on that witness, they aren't doing their jobs. Which would seem to confirm DvlDog's suspicion about the dog and pony show from the prosecutors.
Why would he?What’s really going to send everyone into a downward spiral of hate and stupidity is when Chauvin doesn’t testify.
Only reason is his counsel reading the jurors. Based on the evidence only, you put his buddies on the force up, your experts and be done.Why would he?
I’d be terrified of putting him on the stand and him coming off as dispassionate.Only reason is his counsel reading the jurors. Based on the evidence only, you put his buddies on the force up, your experts and be done.
If he is not convicted and doesn’t testify, the butthurt will be legendary.
as for the riots, they are coming whether acquitted, convicted or convicted of lesser charges.
I didn't have time to pull yesterday's stuff - here is where I get it from - https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/...ate-too-many-drugs-video-may-be-game-changer/Any updates for today?
From the state’s telling, fentanyl had nothing substantive to do with Floyd’s death. Sure, Floyd was an addict, but that wasn’t a factor to which we should attribute his death, but merely another reason to sympathize with the struggling Floyd, who was after all still a loved human being despite his addictions. Don’t pay any attention to the drug narrative, that’s not what killed Floyd!I didn't have time to pull yesterday's stuff - here is where I get it from - https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/...ate-too-many-drugs-video-may-be-game-changer/
We haven’t actually heard from the state’s actual ME, correct? We heard from the state’s hired ME. Defense has yet to call any witnesses, correct? Of which, one will be the actual state’s ME who will talk about the overdose.From the state’s telling, fentanyl had nothing substantive to do with Floyd’s death. Sure, Floyd was an addict, but that wasn’t a factor to which we should attribute his death, but merely another reason to sympathize with the struggling Floyd, who was after all still a loved human being despite his addictions. Don’t pay any attention to the drug narrative, that’s not what killed Floyd!
Rather, what killed Floyd was Derek Chauvin’s “blood choke” knee to Floyd’s neck. Or maybe it was a respiratory choke delivered by Chauvin’s knee to Floyd’s neck. Or maybe it was mechanical asphyxiation resulting from the pressure applied by all three officers holding Floyd prone. Or maybe it was positional asphyxia because they failed to put Floyd in the recovery position. Or maybe it was that the officers should have started chest compressions on the handcuffed, huge, and just-violent Floyd before EMS showed up. Or maybe, or maybe, or maybe … Does it really matter. Chauvin’s knee!!! Excessive force!!! Not a trained technique!!!
Unfortunately for the state, many of its own witnesses, especially its use-of-force and medical witnesses, whether existing MPD trainers or well-paid expert witnesses from out of town, have testified in ways that substantively undercut that narrative of the state.
So far in the state’s case we’ve heard the state’s own witnesses and experts testify that Chauvin’s knee was on Floyd’s back and shoulder blades, not his neck. We’ve heard them testify that not only was Chauvin’s force not excessive, he would have been privileged to use more force and declined to do so—a choice they characterized as de-escalation. We’ve seen photographs from MPD training materials showing officers being trained to place their knees on suspects in exactly the manner Chauvin had placed his knee on Floyd.None of that can be said to buttress the state’s still vague and ambiguous narrative of guilt.
Even now, 9 days in, we still don’t have an actual medical opinion of Floyd’s cause of death, other than cardiac arrest induced by apparent asphyxia. Was that asphyxia caused by the officers charged in this case? Perhaps.
Alternatively, is there an equally, or even more likely, explanation for Floyd’s death? Perhaps the astonishing high levels of fentanyl in his system, and the fentanyl discovered (eventually) in both the Mercedes SUV Floyd was driving and the squad car from which Floyd achieved his violent escape.
After all, how does fentanyl kill? By depressing respiratory function. That is, by chemical induction of asphyxia. Which eventually, of course, will result in cardiac arrest. Which is how Floyd died.
Not unless the State ME was up today. Defense has not had their turn yet. They have done damage on cross of the States witnesses though.We haven’t actually heard from the state’s actual ME, correct? We heard from the state’s hired ME. Defense has yet to call any witnesses, correct? Of which, one will be the actual state’s ME who will talk about the overdose.
Imagine that, the prosecution witnesses actually helping the prosecutions case. One day out of 9. If Chauvin goes free it'll be greatly due to the ineffectiveness of the prosecution.So much for the fentanyl theory.
Imagine that, the prosecution witnesses actually helping the prosecutions case. One day out of 9. If Chauvin goes free it'll be greatly due to the ineffectiveness of the prosecution.
Odd fact. I had surgery in Feb. I was looking at the itemized list of drugs I was administered and I was given Fentanyl during the surgery. Of all the drugs I was given during my surgery and in the 2 days at Ruby for recovery fentanyl was the cheapest by far. Around 2 bucks for whatever dosage I was given.Moe has no idea how fentanyl works. I’ve seen fentanyl in action, both when legally administed by itself and when someone who’s OD’d on a bad batch of heroin laced with it. The junkies know exactly how much heroin to inject, except when it’s laced, then you get all these ODs. And we are talking about mcg, not mg or grams that can suppress respiration.
Odd fact. I had surgery in Feb. I was looking at the itemized list of drugs I was administered and I was given Fentanyl during the surgery. Of all the drugs I was given during my surgery and in the 2 days at Ruby for recovery fentanyl was the cheapest by far. Around 2 bucks for whatever dosage I was given.
Moe has no idea about a lot of things.Moe has no idea how fentanyl works. I’ve seen fentanyl in action, both when legally administed by itself and when someone who’s OD’d on a bad batch of heroin laced with it. The junkies know exactly how much heroin to inject, except when it’s laced, then you get all these ODs. And we are talking about mcg, not mg or grams that can suppress respiration.
the doc said noMoe has no idea how fentanyl works. I’ve seen fentanyl in action, both when legally administed by itself and when someone who’s OD’d on a bad batch of heroin laced with it. The junkies know exactly how much heroin to inject, except when it’s laced, then you get all these ODs. And we are talking about mcg, not mg or grams that can suppress respiration.
Everything I’ve read about the Prosecution’s ME from yesterday was that he gave extremely compelling and effective testimony. I didn’t see the Defense ask why he was used vs the actual state’s ME for the benefit of the jury to understand the prosecution went doctor shopping when their own ME’s findings shot their allegations to hell.FIFY