I watched a few minutes of the Don Lemon show where he along with 3 other libs (4 when adding Lemon) and a token conservative discussed Dr. Ben Carson's appointment to run HUD.
Armstrong Williams, a confidante of Dr. Carson, tweeted this comment earlier:
"Dr. Carson feels he has no government experience, he's never run a federal agency," Carson's close friend Armstrong Williams said. "The last thing he would want to do was take a position that could cripple the presidency."
Dr. Carson even though libs hate him, is a man of honor. The CNN crew, except for the token conservative, laughed hysterically about Carson's lack of experience and his admission of such. They laughed that he would dare to try and run an important agency with no prior executive experience. How HUD was too important an institution to be turned over to an amateur. They laughed and laughed and laughed (watch the clip if you think I am exaggerating).
Later, I watched Fox News and Megyn Kelly (replay). She had on a Dem and a Conservative. They discussed the tweet. The Dem pointed out his obvious lack of experience and how detrimental it would be. Kelly, to her credit, made the observation that Dems did not care that Obama had zero executive experience when running for the highest office in the land. He never ran anything. His legislative experience was very sparse with no legislative accomplishments. And he ran to become the chief executive of the most important institution in the country. Dems were thrilled. They didn't laugh and claim him unqualified.
Further, Kelly observed that HUD is badly broken. That Carson is off the charts brilliant. That Carson is a problem solver (brain surgeons have to be), ran pediatric neurology at Johns Hopkins and that an outside perspective may be just the prescription with new ideas, and new ways of doing things to help HUD become more efficient and effective. She also observed the Carson would be surrounded by people who have been inside HUD for decades and he could easily use his intellect and his experiences to help solved problems.
And people wonder why no one watches CNN. It was almost unbearable as they mocked this extraordinarily accomplished man, who rose out of abject poverty from the ghetto to become one of the world's leading neurosurgeons.
I read a book many years ago called "The Paradigm Switch." This author made the observation that many of the world's greatest innovations came from outside the industry involved with that product. He observed that those outside the "circle" see things that others on the inside fail to see. He believes those inside a successfully company have a hard time driving change because it is hard for them to see another way of doing things. They feel it has worked in the past and will continue to work. Those outside the circle are not so encumbered and therefore think outside the box.
I have no idea if Carson is good for HUD. I know he's brilliant. I know he his a problem solver. I know he is an outsider. But to mock and ridicule him, was extraordinarily offensive. All 4 libs laughed hysterically. So unprofessional.
Armstrong Williams, a confidante of Dr. Carson, tweeted this comment earlier:
"Dr. Carson feels he has no government experience, he's never run a federal agency," Carson's close friend Armstrong Williams said. "The last thing he would want to do was take a position that could cripple the presidency."
Dr. Carson even though libs hate him, is a man of honor. The CNN crew, except for the token conservative, laughed hysterically about Carson's lack of experience and his admission of such. They laughed that he would dare to try and run an important agency with no prior executive experience. How HUD was too important an institution to be turned over to an amateur. They laughed and laughed and laughed (watch the clip if you think I am exaggerating).
Later, I watched Fox News and Megyn Kelly (replay). She had on a Dem and a Conservative. They discussed the tweet. The Dem pointed out his obvious lack of experience and how detrimental it would be. Kelly, to her credit, made the observation that Dems did not care that Obama had zero executive experience when running for the highest office in the land. He never ran anything. His legislative experience was very sparse with no legislative accomplishments. And he ran to become the chief executive of the most important institution in the country. Dems were thrilled. They didn't laugh and claim him unqualified.
Further, Kelly observed that HUD is badly broken. That Carson is off the charts brilliant. That Carson is a problem solver (brain surgeons have to be), ran pediatric neurology at Johns Hopkins and that an outside perspective may be just the prescription with new ideas, and new ways of doing things to help HUD become more efficient and effective. She also observed the Carson would be surrounded by people who have been inside HUD for decades and he could easily use his intellect and his experiences to help solved problems.
And people wonder why no one watches CNN. It was almost unbearable as they mocked this extraordinarily accomplished man, who rose out of abject poverty from the ghetto to become one of the world's leading neurosurgeons.
I read a book many years ago called "The Paradigm Switch." This author made the observation that many of the world's greatest innovations came from outside the industry involved with that product. He observed that those outside the "circle" see things that others on the inside fail to see. He believes those inside a successfully company have a hard time driving change because it is hard for them to see another way of doing things. They feel it has worked in the past and will continue to work. Those outside the circle are not so encumbered and therefore think outside the box.
I have no idea if Carson is good for HUD. I know he's brilliant. I know he his a problem solver. I know he is an outsider. But to mock and ridicule him, was extraordinarily offensive. All 4 libs laughed hysterically. So unprofessional.