Unbelievable the take this man had. This shit he was spewing was basically cause by the hyperbolic liberal fear mongering and he decided to double down on it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was mild compared to what he said later.Unbelievable the take this man had. This shit he was spewing was basically cause by the hyperbolic liberal fear mongering and he decided to double down on it.
"White lash"...WOW..race bait much???!!!!!!!Unbelievable the take this man had. This shit he was spewing was basically cause by the hyperbolic liberal fear mongering and he decided to double down on it.
Did listen to it...don't have to. What these fvcktards don't understand is that the same areas that voted Obama into office TWICE are the same areas that put Trump in the WH. HRC was a terrible candidate and they had to rig their system to get her as the candidate. So all of these SJW Snowflakes ought to look in the mirror if they want to see the reason HRC lost.Unbelievable the take this man had. This shit he was spewing was basically cause by the hyperbolic liberal fear mongering and he decided to double down on it.
Walk a mile in his shoes. I'm friends with Gary Stills on FB. He said basically the same as Jones.Unbelievable the take this man had. This shit he was spewing was basically cause by the hyperbolic liberal fear mongering and he decided to double down on it.
I agree with a lot of what you just said but rigged? She got millions more votes than Bernie. Give that a rest.Did listen to it...don't have to. What these fvcktards don't understand is that the same areas that voted Obama into office TWICE are the same areas that put Trump in the WH. HRC was a terrible candidate and they had to rig their system to get her as the candidate. So all of these SJW Snowflakes ought to look in the mirror if they want to see the reason HRC lost.
I agree with a lot of what you just said but rigged? She got millions more votes than Bernie. Give that a rest.
If he had gotten more votes than HRC, he would have. HRC got 3.8 million more votes than BS. That is a fact. Look it up. You guys and your "rigged" system. Silly.The DNC was not going to let Bernie get the nomination. Period.
If he had gotten more votes than HRC, he would have. HRC got 3.8 million more votes than BS. That is a fact. Look it up. You guys and your "rigged" system. Silly.
I think the GOP should have narrowed the field a little and let it drag on at that size way too long...but fvck, the Dems should have been able to come up with more than 3 candidates.Between Super Delegates and the DNC actively working against him and doing all they can to support Hillary, it was going to be her nomination regardless.
People kept saying, "The GOP made the mistake in nominating Trump and they're going to pay for it." Well the SAME holds true for the Democrats. They put their eggs in the Clinton basket years ago when they clearly shouldn't have. And now they are paying for it.
I think the GOP should have narrowed the field a little and let it drag on at that size way too long...but fvck, the Dems should have been able to come up with more than 3 candidates.
Walk a mile in his shoes. I'm friends with Gary Stills on FB. He said basically the same as Jones.
Unbelievable the take this man had. This shit he was spewing was basically cause by the hyperbolic liberal fear mongering and he decided to double down on it.
Van was spot on.
The OP is an idiot and having a mental meltdown.
Unbelievable the take this man had. This shit he was spewing was basically cause by the hyperbolic liberal fear mongering and he decided to double down on it.
This is WHERE the OUTRAGE should be focused. The latest update from Chicago. Van Jones and OTHERS should address this.
November to Date
Shot & Killed: 28
Shot & Wounded: 128
Total Shot: 156
Total Homicides: 30
Year to Date
Shot & Killed: 611
Shot & Wounded: 3228
Total Shot: 3839
Total Homicides: 682
For many racialists (see racism everywhere), they are blinded by this belief. We can't just be opposed to Hilary the liar. Or Hillary the felon. Or Hillary's policies. Or Hillary's leadership. We must be racist to vote against her.
For many racialists (see racism everywhere), they are blinded by this belief. We can't just be opposed to Hilary the liar. Or Hillary the felon. Or Hillary's policies. Or Hillary's leadership. We must be racist to vote against her.
It's the Clinton sense of entitlement. No way in hell someone was going to block her this time like Obama did. They had members of the DNC colluding with the press and the campaign to ensure she got the nomination, as well as the WH, and not one shit was given by the Democratic voters. It ultimately backfired on them.
Walk a mile in his shoes. I'm friends with Gary Stills on FB. He said basically the same as Jones.
I don't even like Hillary, nice try.
I don't even like Hillary, nice try.
Well, my eldest daughter dates an African American and he has essentially the opposite opinion. He knows racists exist but he in no way felt this election was "whitewash." He felt that both were immensely disliked but one was disliked more than the other.
In fact, if you look at the rust belt states, Trump got a very large percentage of Obama voters. Van Jones is a racialists and see racism everywhere. Also, everyone needs to keep in mind that this was a change election. Hillary would have won if Obama were a Republican, imo.
The DNC nominated her. She didn't nominate herself.
No, but it's clear that the Clintonites control the DNC.
No...... WE ALL should be outraged about the slaughter that going on in our cities. I was only making the point that I have NEVER EVER seen Van Jones talk about the problem and that we should address it. I also have never heard Van Jones critize President Obama about the plight of African Americans in the 8 years Obama has been in office.......But he starts his racist rant the very night when Trump wins the election.So a black person can and should only be outraged about murders in Chicago according to you?
That said, any white person in WV person ONLY can or should be outraged by the heroin deaths in the region as they far exceed the rate of gun deaths nationwide......
Thanks for proving my point.I married into an African American family and I never heard anything about White Lash until Van brought it up. If that was the case, Obama would have lost in 2012
I married into an African American family and I never heard anything about White Lash until Van brought it up. If that was the case, Obama would have lost in 2012
Thanks for proving my point.
No...... WE ALL should be outraged about the slaughter that going on in our cities. I was only making the point that I have NEVER EVER seen Van Jones talk about the problem and that we should address it. I also have never heard Van Jones critize President Obama about the plight of African Americans in the 8 years Obama has been in office.......But he stanorts his racist rant the very night when Trump wins the election.
Don't try to put words into the comment that I NEVER said. I only pointed out an issue that I am very passionate about. There are a lot of OTHER issues he can shine a light upon on his national show . I never "limited" anything.So again, are you saying he can and should be outraged only over murders in Chicago and nothing else?
I agree with you that murders in Chicago should be high on his list of concerns (and for all of us) but for you to limit his concerns/outrage only to one topic is patronizing at best.
Why are you arguing with me.....I agree with you.All I can think is that is made for good TV. I thought he was on point for the first few minutes of his piece until he went all white-lash on the American voters who elected Trump. As I said above, if there was evidence of that, it would have occurred in 2012 and not 2016.
If and I mean if there was any white-lash it was due to Obama and Clinton embracing BLM. Anti-law enforcement is good stance to take in the US.
Van was spot on.
The OP is an idiot and having a mental meltdown.
I'm not saying that I agree with all of it, but he does make a solid point about several things. Trump acted like a bully multiple times during the nomination and election cycle. He came into the first debate seemingly unprepared. If I had a child old enough to be watching the process with me, I could see her pointing those things out when I told her not to bully or to do her homework. The white-lash thing is where I break from Van, and that's fine. He's entitled to his perspective.
I watched his exchange with Lewandowski later in the program. Lewandowski was basically needling Van about why Hillary had not conceded the win to Trump yet - constant interruptions and such - and Van had a good response about that. First, the campaign had not conceded because they were waiting on a handful more states to be called - the count was 244 to 20x at that point I believe. Second, it was 2 AM, so a concession speech would wait until the morning. The last point was where I thought he made the best point though. He said that if someone goes into work the next day and had that same exchange with someone who supported the other candidate, that we would never heal a divide in this country.
Van Jones is a racialist. He sees racism everywhere. Look at the vote in PA, OH, MI, WI among other states at the sheer number of white people that voted for Obama and also Trump. Whitelash indeed. Sure some racists voted for Trump just as some racists voted for Hillary. But this election had very, very little to do with race and everything to do with economics and the rebellion against the establishment.