House Intelligence Committee launches Uranium One probe.

[WVU82]

Russian Nuclear Scandal - What Did Hillary Clinton Know? | National ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../russian-nuclear-scandal-what-did-hillary-clinton-know
8 hours ago - New Russian Nuclear Scandal Raises New Questions AboutClinton Foundation ... nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton's charitable foundation during the ...


FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration ...
thehill.com/.../355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administrati...
15 hours ago - FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved ... Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear ... officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit .... assistance to Bill Clinton's foundation, sources confirmed to The Hill.

Russian nuke bribes were known when uranium deal approved | Daily ...
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../Russian-nuke-bribes-known-uranium-deal-approved.html
4 hours ago - The FBI was investigating a plot involving Russian bribes before the Obama ... New Clinton Foundation scandal: Now Russians revealed to have routed millions of dollars to it ... indicate Russian nuclear officials steered millions to the U.S. that were 'designed to benefit' the Clinton Foundation then being ...

 

[WVU82]

The Hill this morning broke what could be a very big news story, if anyone is willing to follow up on it. As is often the case with these kinds of stories, it bears watching if the reporting falls apart somehow, but as of yet, it seems there’s almost no pushback out there. You can see why Democrats would not be eager to talk about this one:

Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews….[Federal agents] obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

This was back during the period when the Obama Administration and Secretary Clinton were touting a “reset” of relations with Russia; it was years before Obama mocked Mitt Romney’s concerns about the Russian threat with his famous “the 80s called” sneer. Yet, it now appears that the Obama Administration knew a lot more than it let on,

leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions. The first decision occurred in October 2010, when the State Department and government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States unanimously approved the partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom, giving Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium supply…In 2011, the administration gave approval for Rosatom’s Tenex subsidiary to sell commercial uranium to U.S. nuclear power plants in a partnership with the United States Enrichment Corp. Before then, Tenex had been limited to selling U.S. nuclear power plants reprocessed uranium recovered from dismantled Soviet nuclear weapons under the 1990s Megatons to Megawatts peace program. “The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns. And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a person who worked on the case told The Hill, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution by U.S. or Russian officials.

At a minimum, as Noah Rothman notes, the involvement of key members of the current Trump-Russia probe in conducting this investigation will play right into Trump’s hands in his campaign to discredit the investigation, and Democrats thus far seem likely to just circle the wagons against any further inquiry for that reason as well as how this reflects on the Clintons, Eric Holder, and the Obama Administration’s Russia policy. But the national security implications run deeper than that, and as Ed Morrissey observes, Congress ought to dig in further to see what else it wasn’t told:

House Intelligence chair Mike Rogers claimed to the Hill that no one ever mentioned the case at all to him, despite already-extant concerns over the Uranium One deal on Capitol Hill.
That smells like a political cover-up of the first magnitude. Rather than hyperventilate over Facebook ads and Twitter trolls, perhaps Congress and the current Department of Justice should look into what the FBI found in 2009-10, how much of it benefited Bill and Hillary Clinton — and why the DoJ and the Obama administration never briefed the intelligence committees on this Russian collusion operation.

Washington has an unfortunate tendency to back off investigations when there are skeletons on both sides of the partisan aisle. But a thorough airing of Russia’s multifaceted efforts to penetrate and disrupt American institutions (including the media) over the past decade is necessary in order to counter the threat of the Kremlin’s “war by other means” doctrine. Let the chips fall where they may.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/452776/russian-nuclear-scandal-what-did-hillary-clinton-know

 

[Airport]

The clintons are dirty, dirty money grubbing people. There has been one constant in Russia collusion and that's the Clintons. The clinton's are for sale.

 

[WVU82]

tens of millions of dollars from Russia...

looks like the Clinton Foundation was laundering money...

Mueller was there too...

Rosenstein was hiding this info...

THIS STARTED IN 2010

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

 

[eerdoc]

tens of millions of dollars from Russia...

looks like the Clinton Foundation was laundering money...

Mueller was there too...

Rosenstein was hiding this info...

Yep, we have at least two foxes in the henhouse--Mueller and Rosenstein. Both should resign from their appointed positions. Mueller is totally unfit to spearhead ANY investigation of potential wrongdoing. He is up to his eyeballs in scandal. Rosenstein is a holdover that really needs to go, immediately. The AG needs to use the information now coming out to can his a$$.

 

[WVU82]

 

[eerdoc]

View embedded media

Would hope that Jeff Sessions gets off his duff and gets fully immersed in this massive security breach. Mueller and Rosenstein need to go and a special prosecutor needs to be appointed to specifically investigate the Obama justice department, FBI, and other prominent administration figures and Hillary Clinton in particular. This is a pending crises and National security has been compromised BIG TIME.

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

lol...

true...

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

Investigation of RBC: how the "troll factory" worked in the US elections

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

 

[atlkvb]

tens of millions of dollars from Russia...

looks like the Clinton Foundation was laundering money...

Mueller was there too...

Rosenstein was hiding this info...

THIS STARTED IN 2010

I predicted early on in this phony "Trump colluded with Russians to steal the election from Hillary" story, that once we learn all of the facts, and get to all of the details, that it will in fact be Hillary, Obama, and the Democrats who would be guilty of any "collusion" with the Russians during this past election cycle.

These details as they become more known, certainly validate that prediction. Once again, the Left accusing others of what in fact they do!

Unreal.

(maybe @countryroads89 will finally translate that Russian for us to explain how the Dems pulled it all off?)

 

[WVU82]

It still boggles my mind in that they accuse the right of doing EXACTLY WHAT THEY'RE GUILTY OF !

They've been using this tactic FOR YEARS !

jail cells needed...

 

[atlkvb]

View embedded media

Where is @moe, @countryroads89, @WVUBRU, @Original Mountaineer1 or RPJ defending any of this? Surely they have some explanation?

Lies? True?

Nothing?

Hmmmmm

 

[atlkvb]

They've been using this tactic FOR YEARS !

It amazes me why more folks haven't figured this out yet!

 

[atlkvb]

View embedded media

We really need @countryroads89 to decipher this!

 

[atlkvb]

View embedded media

They were/are corrupt to the core. Along with the incompetent main news media that ignores their corruption. @WVPATX was 100% correct about that!

 

[atlkvb]

The Hill this morning broke what could be a very big news story, if anyone is willing to follow up on it. As is often the case with these kinds of stories, it bears watching if the reporting falls apart somehow, but as of yet, it seems there’s almost no pushback out there. You can see why Democrats would not be eager to talk about this one:

Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews….[Federal agents] obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

This was back during the period when the Obama Administration and Secretary Clinton were touting a “reset” of relations with Russia; it was years before Obama mocked Mitt Romney’s concerns about the Russian threat with his famous “the 80s called” sneer. Yet, it now appears that the Obama Administration knew a lot more than it let on,

leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin’s commercial nuclear ambitions. The first decision occurred in October 2010, when the State Department and government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States unanimously approved the partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom, giving Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium supply…In 2011, the administration gave approval for Rosatom’s Tenex subsidiary to sell commercial uranium to U.S. nuclear power plants in a partnership with the United States Enrichment Corp. Before then, Tenex had been limited to selling U.S. nuclear power plants reprocessed uranium recovered from dismantled Soviet nuclear weapons under the 1990s Megatons to Megawatts peace program. “The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns. And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a person who worked on the case told The Hill, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution by U.S. or Russian officials.

At a minimum, as Noah Rothman notes, the involvement of key members of the current Trump-Russia probe in conducting this investigation will play right into Trump’s hands in his campaign to discredit the investigation, and Democrats thus far seem likely to just circle the wagons against any further inquiry for that reason as well as how this reflects on the Clintons, Eric Holder, and the Obama Administration’s Russia policy. But the national security implications run deeper than that, and as Ed Morrissey observes, Congress ought to dig in further to see what else it wasn’t told:

House Intelligence chair Mike Rogers claimed to the Hill that no one ever mentioned the case at all to him, despite already-extant concerns over the Uranium One deal on Capitol Hill.
That smells like a political cover-up of the first magnitude. Rather than hyperventilate over Facebook ads and Twitter trolls, perhaps Congress and the current Department of Justice should look into what the FBI found in 2009-10, how much of it benefited Bill and Hillary Clinton — and why the DoJ and the Obama administration never briefed the intelligence committees on this Russian collusion operation.

Washington has an unfortunate tendency to back off investigations when there are skeletons on both sides of the partisan aisle. But a thorough airing of Russia’s multifaceted efforts to penetrate and disrupt American institutions (including the media) over the past decade is necessary in order to counter the threat of the Kremlin’s “war by other means” doctrine. Let the chips fall where they may.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/452776/russian-nuclear-scandal-what-did-hillary-clinton-know

I believe this is why all of those e-mails on Hillary's illegal server were bleach bit destroyed. She didn't want anyone knowing about any of this, and she was "kankle deep" in it!

 

[atlkvb]

Yep, we have at least two foxes in the henhouse--Mueller and Rosenstein. Both should resign from their appointed positions. Mueller is totally unfit to spearhead ANY investigation of potential wrongdoing. He is up to his eyeballs in scandal. Rosenstein is a holdover that really needs to go, immediately. The AG needs to use the information now coming out to can his a$$.

The entire Special prosecutor's investigative team loaded with Clinton sympathizers and suppotrers also needs to go! The whole operation is nothing but a giant politically motivated scam designed to deflect all of this illegal Russian actitivty away from the Clinton/Obama administrations and onto Trump! They're all covered in Russian feces and trying to smear Trump with it!!!!!

What a bunch of despicable reprobates.

 

[WVU82]

EVERY part of the clinton/owebamagang reeks of corruption...

and we haven't even mentioned Rice, Holder, Powers, Lynch, Carter, Kerry, Panetta, Podesta...

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

and ALL THIS WAS TO BE SWEPT UNDER THE CARPET AFTER HILLIARY WON...

to be buried forever...

 

[WVU82]

lol...

http://www.cnn.com/

holy hell...

It's just one attack after another on Trump...

I can see why the left is so uninformed...

THERE IS NOT ONE MENTION OF ANYTHING IN THIS THREAD on cnn...

I even searched for it... laundering & extortion...

It's like Clinton doesn't exist...

just searched on cnn for 'clinton russia' and the results are insane:

Donating to Trump? Campaign is spending $1 of every $10 on legal fees

FBI releases early draft of Comey's Clinton statement

Hill Russia investigators probe GOP operative who sought Clinton emails

Yahoo: Russian trolls watched 'House of Cards' to learn about US politics

Trump allies worry that losing the House means impeachment

Trump campaign legal bills topped $1M in three months

I can now see why the left is populated by idiots, they ONLY watch cnn.

It's like tunnel-vision...

THEY ARE IN DENIAL...

 

[atlkvb]

lol...

http://www.cnn.com/

holy hell...

It's just one attack after another on Trump...

I can see why the left is so uninformed...

THERE IS NOT ONE MENTION OF ANYTHING IN THIS THREAD...

I even searched for it... laundering & extortion...

It's like Clinton doesn't exist...

just searched on cnn for 'clinton russia' and the results are insane:

Donating to Trump? Campaign is spending $1 of every $10 on legal fees

FBI releases early draft of Comey's Clinton statement

Hill Russia investigators probe GOP operative who sought Clinton emails

Yahoo: Russian trolls watched 'House of Cards' to learn about US politics

Trump allies worry that losing the House means impeachment

Trump campaign legal bills topped $1M in three months

Now what you've posted here is why I've had such heated arguments with @WVPATX on if these people are corrupt or simply incompetent? An argument could easily be made either way on CNN with this information you've posted. Because I used to work in the media and I know truly lazy, stupid and biased some of these folks are, I tend to believe that many of them are totally unaware of the daming evidence now coming out about Clinton/Obama and their Russian "collusion".

On the other hand, they're so obssessed with nailing something negative on Trump because they are so blinded by their ideological & irrational hatred of him, that they have truly corrupted themselves to ignore any and all news that doesn't fit that specific agenda or narrative they are peddling.

So it it corrpution or rank incompetence?

You decide.

 

[moe]

Yep, we have at least two foxes in the henhouse--Mueller and Rosenstein. Both should resign from their appointed positions. Mueller is totally unfit to spearhead ANY investigation of potential wrongdoing. He is up to his eyeballs in scandal. Rosenstein is a holdover that really needs to go, immediately. The AG needs to use the information now coming out to can his a$$.

lol indeed, the pending obstruction of justice charges against the so called prez need firmed up.

 

[Brushy Bill]

lol indeed, the pending obstruction of justice charges against the so called prez need firmed up.

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Seriously, I’ve checked NBC and CNN. Neither are running the story, at all. Hahahahha

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

 

[WVU82]

Seriously, I’ve checked NBC and CNN. Neither are running the story, at all. Hahahahha

so basically cnn & nbc ARE SAFE SPACES !