Liberals don't bother me one way or the other.......i just don't vote for 'em.Are you just another punch-n-run bleater?
I don't have anything against liberals. It's Pedo-Joe and the rest of the socialists/communists/Marxists who have taken over the Democrat party.
Are you just another punch-n-run bleater?
I don't have anything against liberals. It's Pedo-Joe and the rest of the socialists/communists/Marxists who have taken over the Democrat party.
Well, i damn sure wasn't going to vote for Gore, Kerry, Obama, Obama, Clinton, Biden......or waste my vote on a libertarian candidate.........or are those things that you did?
voting for a third party that reflects your ideas more than the RT or D offered is not a wasteWell, i damn sure wasn't going to vote for Gore, Kerry, Obama, Obama, Clinton, Biden......or waste my vote on a libertarian candidate.........or are those things that you did?
voting for a third party that reflects your ideas more than the RT or D offered is not a waste
if a 3rd party got to just 5% it could make a huge difference
New Democrat Party? Care to elaborate? Democrats are Keynsians at best and Marxists at worst, Libertarians are more of the mind of Mises, Rothbard and Hoppe. Ever heard of a Democrat that wanted to audit or even end the fed? How would democrats fund their government policies without printing money?It's a vote for the new Democrat Party. Nothing more.
New Democrat Party? Care to elaborate? Democrats are Keynsians at best and Marxists at worst, Libertarians are more of the mind of Mises, Rothbard and Hoppe. Ever heard of a Democrat that wanted to audit or even end the fed? How would democrats fund their government policies without printing money?
the 2 party system we are stuck in sucks! it has allowed both parties to be controlled by internally and not by the people. Adding third party for a more nuanced conversation at the very least would be the best thing to happen to the politician process in a century.
This could make a huge difference in our country!
"Since no third-party candidate received 5% of the vote in the 2008 presidential election, only the Republican and Democratic parties were eligible for 2012 convention grants, and only their nominees were eligible to receive grants for the general election once they were nominated. Third-party candidates could qualify for public funds retroactively if they received 5% or more of the vote in the general election."
Think of something else to get you attention. This ones oldGuess some of you lemmings are okay with voting for liberal candidates
Trump was responsible for the most conservative tangible results of my lifetime, and I’m guessing yours as well.Guess some of you lemmings are okay with voting for liberal candidates
Trump was responsible for the most conservative tangible results of my lifetime, and I’m guessing yours as well.
If you like Trump…great…good for you…but for me….he’s just too liberal……. We are all entitled to our own opinions……..Trump was responsible for the most conservative tangible results of my lifetime, and I’m guessing yours as well.
The most conservative tangible results?Trump was responsible for the most conservative tangible results of my lifetime, and I’m guessing yours as well.
The most conservative tangible results?
I'll remind you that during his presidency the ENTIRE ECONOMY was shut down and people werent allowed to leave their houses to go to church or the park without threat from the police, AND there was also the largest expansion of monetary supply in the history of the whole entire world.
To weeks to stop the spread….You must live in a State with a Governor that did that to you. Sorry to hear that.
BBBBBAAAAAHHHHHGuess some of you lemmings are okay with voting for liberal candidates
To weeks to stop the spread….
or do you not remember that mantra?
How "Liberal" has he been on THE defining issue for most true Conservative voters (protecting the lives of innocent unborn babies)?Guess some of you lemmings are okay with voting for liberal candidates
What's your opinion of expanding school choice vouchers and eliminating funding for the Jimmy Carter created Department of Education? (sending that funding back to States in block grants)If you like Trump…great…good for you…but for me….he’s just too liberal……. We are all entitled to our own opinions……..
How "Liberal" has he been on THE defining issue for most true Conservative voters (protecting the lives of innocent unborn babies)?
And your silent ans is? 🤔
How about a balanced budget ammendment to the Constitution? Zero based budgeting? Eliminating all taxes on inheritance, corporate income, investment, and savings?Liberals don't bother me one way or the other.......i just don't vote for 'em.
He's not serious. He's just trolling. I think he's at least a Social Lib. Can't defend that of course, so he simply attacks Trump as a Conservative because he can't honestly say what else he's actually for? (particularly on the Left's indefensible social policy)He's got the sads because nobody likes Haley or Christie.
He's not serious. He's just trolling. I think he's at least a Social Lib. Can't defend that of course, so he simply attacks Trump as a Conservative because he can't honestly say what else he's actually for? (particularly on the Left's indefensible social policy)
One of the most obvious differences for me was his opening up US energy sources to domestic production. That eventually led the US to becoming energy independent, and the largest energy supplier in the world.Trump was responsible for the most conservative tangible results of my lifetime, and I’m guessing yours as well.
Why are you blaming Trump for that scam?The most conservative tangible results?
I'll remind you that during his presidency the ENTIRE ECONOMY was shut down and people werent allowed to leave their houses to go to church or the park without threat from the police, AND there was also the largest expansion of monetary supply in the history of the whole entire world.
I actually can’t stand him, but if he wins the nom, I’ll vote for him again. He has an established track record of delivering conservatism beyond anyone else on the docket or any previous GOP President save maybe for Reagan.If you like Trump…great…good for you…but for me….he’s just too liberal……. We are all entitled to our own opinions……..
That wasn’t the Fed Govt, it was the local Govt that locked shit down, and I was still going to work after my 2 week chillaxation.The most conservative tangible results?
I'll remind you that during his presidency the ENTIRE ECONOMY was shut down and people werent allowed to leave their houses to go to church or the park without threat from the police, AND there was also the largest expansion of monetary supply in the history of the whole entire world.
I just have a problem with a mental midget running his cocksucker on a message board for attentionGuess some of you lemmings are okay with voting for liberal candidates
The most conservative tangible results?
I'll remind you that during his presidency the ENTIRE ECONOMY was shut down and people werent allowed to leave their houses to go to church or the park without threat from the police, AND there was also the largest expansion of monetary supply in the history of the whole entire world.
Then he sat on his hands while state governments violated the constitution with no reprimand or holding anyone accountable?That wasn’t the Fed Govt, it was the local Govt that locked shit down, and I was still going to work after my 2 week chillaxation.
Seems your argument is with Congress
That's true expanding M1 without increasing GDP does put price pressure on available good and services as more money chasing fewer good tends to spike prices. However Trump's policies were all designed to expand economic activity not by printing more money but by creating more goods and services! Where were you supporting his policies for lower taxes on corporate incomes, allowances for business write offs for new plants and equipment, lowering the fees on expatriated funds, and eliminating capital gains & investment taxes? All of those were fiscal policies aimed at expanding M1 by increased economic activity, not failed Keynesian monetary policy as you've pointed out.$2.2TRILLION!!!!!!
Does money printing and government expansion cause inflation?
yes any policy that gives the federal government less money I am in favor ofThat's true expanding M1 without increasing GDP does put price pressure on available good and services as more money chasing fewer good tends to spike prices. However Trump's policies were all designed to expand economic activity not by printing more money but by creating more goods and services! Where were you supporting his policies for lower taxes on corporate incomes, allowances for business write offs for new plants and equipment, lowering the fees on expatriated funds, and eliminating capital gains & investment taxes? All of those were fiscal policies aimed at expanding M1 by increased economic activity, not failed Keynesian monetary policy as you've pointed out.
Did you support those policies of Trump he pushed for when he was in Office the same way you're bashing him now for the misguided policies of the Fed?
@cam_blev ...being totally honest
So what are you complaining about now, besides just being a typical anti-Trump malcontent?
He won't answer you. He is using the fake "plandemic" to blame Trump just like the rest of the dishonest Left used it to find any way they could to get rid of him.Show me one iota of evidence that he did that.
Well a lot of what you said here is certainly true when it comes to misguided government spending, but you're blaming Trump for the effects of the plandemic and not giving him any credit before the Socialist/Globalist elites launched that scam onto us...in part to undo all the positives he had accomplished with his economic policies!yes any policy that gives the federal government less money I am in favor of
but spending is the other side of the coin, dems and republicans with argue and fight over taxes but in reality it doesn't even matter what they are taxing because they aren't paying for their programs with tax money, they pay for them with the money printer. Taxes don't come close to covering expenses and trump never lowered expenses. As a matter of fact I believe he was floating the idea of negative interest rates.
The fact is that 2020 was one of if not the worst year in modern US history and he was sitting in the big chair and he did not perform well. And his response was to print more money than any government ever. $1200 to the peons... and do we really need to go over everything else that was included in that bill?