ADVERTISEMENT

Trump is just too liberal for me.....

EERs 3:16

Heisman Winner
Oct 17, 2001
73,509
1,257
508
Guess some of you lemmings are okay with voting for liberal candidates
 
Are you just another punch-n-run bleater?

I don't have anything against liberals. It's Pedo-Joe and the rest of the socialists/communists/Marxists who have taken over the Democrat party.
 
Are you just another punch-n-run bleater?

I don't have anything against liberals. It's Pedo-Joe and the rest of the socialists/communists/Marxists who have taken over the Democrat party.
Liberals don't bother me one way or the other.......i just don't vote for 'em.
 
Are you just another punch-n-run bleater?

I don't have anything against liberals. It's Pedo-Joe and the rest of the socialists/communists/Marxists who have taken over the Democrat party.

Voted for Mitt Romney, George Bush, and John McCain and now wants to claim Trump is too liberal. That's an hilarious take.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Well, i damn sure wasn't going to vote for Gore, Kerry, Obama, Obama, Clinton, Biden......or waste my vote on a libertarian candidate.........or are those things that you did?
 
Well, i damn sure wasn't going to vote for Gore, Kerry, Obama, Obama, Clinton, Biden......or waste my vote on a libertarian candidate.........or are those things that you did?

I didn't vote because I was serving. That was my personal view on it and I certainly don't except others to share it. But it's how I got through serving bad leadership on both sides. Just keep my head down and do my job and not get emotionally attached to any of the political class. Registering on base during the Clinton and Obama administration was also a good way to end up on an enemies list if you didn’t register Democrat. So there's that. Trump is going to win the nomination. All the election interference by the Democrats isn't going to stop it. So get ready to cast your vote for him against whatever Communist the Democrats roll out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
Well, i damn sure wasn't going to vote for Gore, Kerry, Obama, Obama, Clinton, Biden......or waste my vote on a libertarian candidate.........or are those things that you did?
voting for a third party that reflects your ideas more than the RT or D offered is not a waste
if a 3rd party got to just 5% it could make a huge difference
 
It's a vote for the new Democrat Party. Nothing more.
New Democrat Party? Care to elaborate? Democrats are Keynsians at best and Marxists at worst, Libertarians are more of the mind of Mises, Rothbard and Hoppe. Ever heard of a Democrat that wanted to audit or even end the fed? How would democrats fund their government policies without printing money?

the 2 party system we are stuck in sucks! it has allowed both parties to be controlled by internally and not by the people. Adding third party for a more nuanced conversation at the very least would be the best thing to happen to the politician process in a century.

This could make a huge difference in our country!
"Since no third-party candidate received 5% of the vote in the 2008 presidential election, only the Republican and Democratic parties were eligible for 2012 convention grants, and only their nominees were eligible to receive grants for the general election once they were nominated. Third-party candidates could qualify for public funds retroactively if they received 5% or more of the vote in the general election."
 
Last edited:
New Democrat Party? Care to elaborate? Democrats are Keynsians at best and Marxists at worst, Libertarians are more of the mind of Mises, Rothbard and Hoppe. Ever heard of a Democrat that wanted to audit or even end the fed? How would democrats fund their government policies without printing money?

the 2 party system we are stuck in sucks! it has allowed both parties to be controlled by internally and not by the people. Adding third party for a more nuanced conversation at the very least would be the best thing to happen to the politician process in a century.

This could make a huge difference in our country!
"Since no third-party candidate received 5% of the vote in the 2008 presidential election, only the Republican and Democratic parties were eligible for 2012 convention grants, and only their nominees were eligible to receive grants for the general election once they were nominated. Third-party candidates could qualify for public funds retroactively if they received 5% or more of the vote in the general election."

You need to forget what your political science teacher taught you. New Era, New tactics, same Marxist infiltration. As far as Libertarians I have nothing against them. Rand Paul is a Libertarian who ran as a Republican. Why? So he could win.

Vote for a third party and you helped elect a Democrat. It's really that simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVUALLEN
Trump was responsible for the most conservative tangible results of my lifetime, and I’m guessing yours as well.

I agree and in reality he's a middle of the road kind of guy. Which shows how far left the Democrats and RINOS have moved. There wouldn't be a need for Trump if that hadn't of happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Trump was responsible for the most conservative tangible results of my lifetime, and I’m guessing yours as well.
If you like Trump…great…good for you…but for me….he’s just too liberal……. We are all entitled to our own opinions……..
 
Trump was responsible for the most conservative tangible results of my lifetime, and I’m guessing yours as well.
The most conservative tangible results?
I'll remind you that during his presidency the ENTIRE ECONOMY was shut down and people werent allowed to leave their houses to go to church or the park without threat from the police, AND there was also the largest expansion of monetary supply in the history of the whole entire world.
 
The most conservative tangible results?
I'll remind you that during his presidency the ENTIRE ECONOMY was shut down and people werent allowed to leave their houses to go to church or the park without threat from the police, AND there was also the largest expansion of monetary supply in the history of the whole entire world.

You must live in a State with a Governor that did that to you. Sorry to hear that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
To weeks to stop the spread….

or do you not remember that mantra?

I remember the CCP releasing a virus on the world. I remember leaders taking appropriate steps until you figure out exactly what you are dealing with. I also remember many Governor's pushing back when Trump told them it was time to open things back up. I also remember you using other accounts on here calling for more shutdowns while hiding under your bed. So good luck in your attempt to rewrite history now goofball.
 
Guess some of you lemmings are okay with voting for liberal candidates
How "Liberal" has he been on THE defining issue for most true Conservative voters (protecting the lives of innocent unborn babies)?

And your silent ans is? 🤔
 
If you like Trump…great…good for you…but for me….he’s just too liberal……. We are all entitled to our own opinions……..
What's your opinion of expanding school choice vouchers and eliminating funding for the Jimmy Carter created Department of Education? (sending that funding back to States in block grants)

Trump 100% supports it. How about you?
 
How "Liberal" has he been on THE defining issue for most true Conservative voters (protecting the lives of innocent unborn babies)?

And your silent ans is? 🤔


He's got the sads because nobody likes Haley or Christie.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: atlkvb
Liberals don't bother me one way or the other.......i just don't vote for 'em.
How about a balanced budget ammendment to the Constitution? Zero based budgeting? Eliminating all taxes on inheritance, corporate income, investment, and savings?

Guess what Trump's "Liberal" position is on all of those? Yes! Do it!

Yours?
 
Last edited:
He's got the sads because nobody likes Haley or Christie.
He's not serious. He's just trolling. I think he's at least a Social Lib. Can't defend that of course, so he simply attacks Trump as a Conservative because he can't honestly say what else he's actually for? (particularly on the Left's indefensible social policy)
 
He's not serious. He's just trolling. I think he's at least a Social Lib. Can't defend that of course, so he simply attacks Trump as a Conservative because he can't honestly say what else he's actually for? (particularly on the Left's indefensible social policy)

Let's hope him and airport make a full recovery from what ails them.
 
Trump was responsible for the most conservative tangible results of my lifetime, and I’m guessing yours as well.
One of the most obvious differences for me was his opening up US energy sources to domestic production. That eventually led the US to becoming energy independent, and the largest energy supplier in the world.

That had significant impact on both domestic fiscal policy as well as Foreign policy. To overlook the ramifications of US energy independence is both shortsighted and ignorant.

Biden has undone all the good that created for our economy, and the Left is desperate to prevent Trump from re-establishing US energy independence from the Globalist cabal that is determined to undo American geopolitical & economic dominance.
 
The most conservative tangible results?
I'll remind you that during his presidency the ENTIRE ECONOMY was shut down and people werent allowed to leave their houses to go to church or the park without threat from the police, AND there was also the largest expansion of monetary supply in the history of the whole entire world.
Why are you blaming Trump for that scam?
 
If you like Trump…great…good for you…but for me….he’s just too liberal……. We are all entitled to our own opinions……..
I actually can’t stand him, but if he wins the nom, I’ll vote for him again. He has an established track record of delivering conservatism beyond anyone else on the docket or any previous GOP President save maybe for Reagan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eagle25427
The most conservative tangible results?
I'll remind you that during his presidency the ENTIRE ECONOMY was shut down and people werent allowed to leave their houses to go to church or the park without threat from the police, AND there was also the largest expansion of monetary supply in the history of the whole entire world.
That wasn’t the Fed Govt, it was the local Govt that locked shit down, and I was still going to work after my 2 week chillaxation.

Seems your argument is with Congress
 

Steve Bannon: The Only Years Of Positive Economic News Were The Trump Years​

 
The most conservative tangible results?
I'll remind you that during his presidency the ENTIRE ECONOMY was shut down and people werent allowed to leave their houses to go to church or the park without threat from the police, AND there was also the largest expansion of monetary supply in the history of the whole entire world.

Show me one iota of evidence that he did that.
 
That wasn’t the Fed Govt, it was the local Govt that locked shit down, and I was still going to work after my 2 week chillaxation.

Seems your argument is with Congress
Then he sat on his hands while state governments violated the constitution with no reprimand or holding anyone accountable?
Should he not be the one that does something when people are being arrested for going to church?
Freedom of assembly is part of the first amendment.
Also....
$2.2TRILLION!!!!!!

Does money printing and government expansion cause inflation?

 
$2.2TRILLION!!!!!!

Does money printing and government expansion cause inflation?

That's true expanding M1 without increasing GDP does put price pressure on available good and services as more money chasing fewer good tends to spike prices. However Trump's policies were all designed to expand economic activity not by printing more money but by creating more goods and services! Where were you supporting his policies for lower taxes on corporate incomes, allowances for business write offs for new plants and equipment, lowering the fees on expatriated funds, and eliminating capital gains & investment taxes? All of those were fiscal policies aimed at expanding M1 by increased economic activity, not failed Keynesian monetary policy as you've pointed out.

Did you support those policies of Trump he pushed for when he was in Office the same way you're bashing him now for the misguided policies of the Fed?

@cam_blev ...being totally honest
giphy.gif

So what are you complaining about now, besides just being a typical anti-Trump malcontent?
 
That's true expanding M1 without increasing GDP does put price pressure on available good and services as more money chasing fewer good tends to spike prices. However Trump's policies were all designed to expand economic activity not by printing more money but by creating more goods and services! Where were you supporting his policies for lower taxes on corporate incomes, allowances for business write offs for new plants and equipment, lowering the fees on expatriated funds, and eliminating capital gains & investment taxes? All of those were fiscal policies aimed at expanding M1 by increased economic activity, not failed Keynesian monetary policy as you've pointed out.

Did you support those policies of Trump he pushed for when he was in Office the same way you're bashing him now for the misguided policies of the Fed?

@cam_blev ...being totally honest
giphy.gif

So what are you complaining about now, besides just being a typical anti-Trump malcontent?
yes any policy that gives the federal government less money I am in favor of
but spending is the other side of the coin, dems and republicans with argue and fight over taxes but in reality it doesn't even matter what they are taxing because they aren't paying for their programs with tax money, they pay for them with the money printer. Taxes don't come close to covering expenses and trump never lowered expenses. As a matter of fact I believe he was floating the idea of negative interest rates.
The fact is that 2020 was one of if not the worst year in modern US history and he was sitting in the big chair and he did not perform well. And his response was to print more money than any government ever. $1200 to the peons... and do we really need to go over everything else that was included in that bill?
 
Show me one iota of evidence that he did that.
He won't answer you. He is using the fake "plandemic" to blame Trump just like the rest of the dishonest Left used it to find any way they could to get rid of him.
 
yes any policy that gives the federal government less money I am in favor of
but spending is the other side of the coin, dems and republicans with argue and fight over taxes but in reality it doesn't even matter what they are taxing because they aren't paying for their programs with tax money, they pay for them with the money printer. Taxes don't come close to covering expenses and trump never lowered expenses. As a matter of fact I believe he was floating the idea of negative interest rates.
The fact is that 2020 was one of if not the worst year in modern US history and he was sitting in the big chair and he did not perform well. And his response was to print more money than any government ever. $1200 to the peons... and do we really need to go over everything else that was included in that bill?
Well a lot of what you said here is certainly true when it comes to misguided government spending, but you're blaming Trump for the effects of the plandemic and not giving him any credit before the Socialist/Globalist elites launched that scam onto us...in part to undo all the positives he had accomplished with his economic policies!

I noticed you also did not answer my question to you on what was your position on the fiscal policies he pursued pre-plandemic, which included reducing discretionary spending and allowing Americans to keep more of what they earned? Trump certainly has plenty to blame for his poor management of the scam big pharma, Government health agencies, health care providers, as well as State bureaucrats were running on us with the Covid hype. We did not need to shut the economy down to deal with whatever problems the virus potentially could cause. So I share in your criticism of not just Trump, but the entire global/corporate media infrastructure that helped promote that scam.

I just think it's unfair if not altogether disingenuous on your part to lay all of that at Trump's feet, when you have little to nothing to say about all the good he did pre-plandemic which btw was created specifically to undo all of his positive economic results!

Why is that @cam_blev ?
giphy.gif

Are you just playing stupid or displaying your natural proclivities? 😏
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT