Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This demonizing of people on the opposite side of the political aisle from ourselves must stop at some point. No matter if a person is perceived as a conservative, an indepedent, a liberal, or somewhere in between either end of the political spectrum, by use of selective facts and a polished media campaign, we can demonize anyone and turn society against them. But just because it can be done doesn’t mean it should be done, or that it is right.
SPLC used to be moral. They’ve gone overboard and begun labeling normal conservative organizations as Hate Groups while ignoring obvious Liberal backed groups that traffic in hate.This demonizing of people on the opposite side of the political aisle from ourselves must stop at some point. No matter if a person is perceived as a conservative, an indepedent, a liberal, or somewhere in between either end of the political spectrum, by use of selective facts and a polished media campaign, we can demonize anyone and turn society against them. But just because it can be done doesn’t mean it should be done, or that it is right.
I am familiar with the work of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Over the years, it has ferretted out true racists, neo-nazis, and other people antithical to the ideals upon which America was founded. It has diligently represented victims of racist terrorism, anti-Semitism, and evil conduct against people simply because of their ethnicity, skin color, or religion. It has caused the extinguishment of many local hate groups.
Can i refute Stossel’s misrepresentations, out-context-statements, and inaccuracies, point-by-point? No. I do not have the research capability or time to do that. But i do know the work of the Southern Poverty Law Center, and i do know the founder of the SPLC. His life was threatened numerous times, but he perservered in fighting hate. He was forced to travel under assumed identities to avoid his enemies. He could have given up and walked away for his own safety, but he was determined to do his part to do away with hate groups.
John Stossel’s junk report is the epitome of fake news. I cannot speak to his true intent in doing this, but he further emboldens hate groups by attempting to tear down a major opponent of those hate groups.
This demonizing of people on the opposite side of the political aisle from ourselves must stop at some point. No matter if a person is perceived as a conservative, an indepedent, a liberal, or somewhere in between either end of the political spectrum, by use of selective facts and a polished media campaign, we can demonize anyone and turn society against them. But just because it can be done doesn’t mean it should be done, or that it is right.
I am familiar with the work of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Over the years, it has ferretted out true racists, neo-nazis, and other people antithical to the ideals upon which America was founded. It has diligently represented victims of racist terrorism, anti-Semitism, and evil conduct against people simply because of their ethnicity, skin color, or religion. It has caused the extinguishment of many local hate groups.
Can i refute Stossel’s misrepresentations, out-context-statements, and inaccuracies, point-by-point? No. I do not have the research capability or time to do that. But i do know the work of the Southern Poverty Law Center, and i do know the founder of the SPLC. His life was threatened numerous times, but he perservered in fighting hate. He was forced to travel under assumed identities to avoid his enemies. He could have given up and walked away for his own safety, but he was determined to do his part to do away with hate groups.
John Stossel’s junk report is the epitome of fake news. I cannot speak to his true intent in doing this, but he further emboldens hate groups by attempting to tear down a major opponent of those hate groups.
This demonizing of people on the opposite side of the political aisle from ourselves must stop at some point. No matter if a person is perceived as a conservative, an indepedent, a liberal, or somewhere in between either end of the political spectrum, by use of selective facts and a polished media campaign, we can demonize anyone and turn society against them. But just because it can be done doesn’t mean it should be done, or that it is right.
I am familiar with the work of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Over the years, it has ferretted out true racists, neo-nazis, and other people antithical to the ideals upon which America was founded. It has diligently represented victims of racist terrorism, anti-Semitism, and evil conduct against people simply because of their ethnicity, skin color, or religion. It has caused the extinguishment of many local hate groups.
Can i refute Stossel’s misrepresentations, out-context-statements, and inaccuracies, point-by-point? No. I do not have the research capability or time to do that. But i do know the work of the Southern Poverty Law Center, and i do know the founder of the SPLC. His life was threatened numerous times, but he perservered in fighting hate. He was forced to travel under assumed identities to avoid his enemies. He could have given up and walked away for his own safety, but he was determined to do his part to do away with hate groups.
John Stossel’s junk report is the epitome of fake news. I cannot speak to his true intent in doing this, but he further emboldens hate groups by attempting to tear down a major opponent of those hate groups.
SPLC used to be moral. They’ve gone overboard and begun labeling normal conservative organizations as Hate Groups while ignoring obvious Liberal backed groups that traffic in hate.
lmfao, but the NRA ain't lobbyists they are there to protect us gun owners.
Go back to drinking.lmfao, but the NRA ain't lobbyists they are there to protect us gun owners.
How is it racist to call someone an animal? I mean, it’s not like calling someone a wetback or n***er or slope/dink/slant eye or raghead/hadji/ or kike, or wop, or Mick, etc.
How is it racist to call someone an animal? I mean, it’s not like calling someone a wetback or n***er or slope/dink/slant eye or raghead/hadji/ or kike, or wop, or Mick, etc.
I’m honestly asking how calling someone an animal is racist. Like, if I call someone an animal, is SPLC implying that it is now synonymous with all Hispanics?
I need a ruling here.
DumbYou got your ruling. The SPLC is the law of the land, so says Google.
Infiltrated by $oros groupsSPLC used to be moral. They’ve gone overboard and begun labeling normal conservative organizations as Hate Groups while ignoring obvious Liberal backed groups that traffic in hate.
30 years ago: SPLC = Decent whistle-blower organization
Today: SPLC = Far far left hate group
Shapiro? Owens? Are the SPLC racist and anti-semetic?
I like the Rogan podcast too. I dont have time to listen as much as id like but it is good.More and more people are equating others disagreeing with them with being hateful. That is a surefire way to shut down conversation. If you disagree with me you're not only wrong, you're also evil. Not good.
Joe Rogan said it best recently when he said "We are starved for actual conversation in this country." I agree, with the "we" being defined as a significantly large group of people that are tired of the yelling and shutting down of others. I want to see people have conversations or engage in them myself, even if viewpoints I don't like are expressed.
Joe Rogan's podcast has become enormously popular even though he talks 2-3 hours straight with people. Meanwhile, the news talk shows are eight minute segments where multiple people talk, mostly not for more than 10-15 seconds at a time.
You can disagree with Ben Shapiro every day of the week but the notion that he is hateful is completely and entirely ridiculous.
I like the Rogan podcast too. I dont have time to listen as much as id like but it is good.
Yeah. They are good for driving too. The drive from Morgantown to Charlotte has some radio dead areas so it is nice to have podcast or audiobooks on hand.The good think about the Rogan podcast or any podcast is all you have to do is listen. Oftentimes I'll put it on audio and then do other stuff while I'm listening.
And if he did agree with you, would that not make both of you wrong. That is fairly recent verbiage, but it is good. Actually sounds like Will Rogers way of thinking.More and more people are equating others disagreeing with them with being hateful. That is a surefire way to shut down conversation. If you disagree with me you're not only wrong, you're also evil. Not good.
Joe Rogan said it best recently when he said "We are starved for actual conversation in this country." I agree, with the "we" being defined as a significantly large group of people that are tired of the yelling and shutting down of others. I want to see people have conversations or engage in them myself, even if viewpoints I don't like are expressed.
Joe Rogan's podcast has become enormously popular even though he talks 2-3 hours straight with people. Meanwhile, the news talk shows are eight minute segments where multiple people talk, mostly not for more than 10-15 seconds at a time.
You can disagree with Ben Shapiro every day of the week but the notion that he is hateful is completely and entirely ridiculous.