I think it is the right idea.
The new law in California says college athletes can get paid for the use of their likeness, etc...
However, schools do not have to pay athletes.
I haven’t read the actual law as it is written yet, but allowing players to make money off their time as an athlete in college is the right thing to do.
I have thought that was the correct decision previously and usually I think law makers in California are high before deciding on a law, but this one I agree with.
Let markets dictate how much an athlete can make. If a car dealer wants to hire Austin Kendall to do a commercial, there should be no problem with that. If the 3rd string kicker wants to sit outside in front of Walmart and charge little kids a dollar to take a pic with him, then fine.
If an attractive female soccer player wants to do modeling work, why not?
The majority of athletes are not going to get offers for their likeness because the return on investment for those willing to pay them is not going to be there.
The market will dictate who gets what.
And when team mates no longer want to block for a guy getting paid while they don’t get paid yet put in the same amount of work and his performance falls off as a result, then so be it.
There will be negative consequences to this ruling just as there is with any ruling. We will just have to wait and see what it is.
The new law in California says college athletes can get paid for the use of their likeness, etc...
However, schools do not have to pay athletes.
I haven’t read the actual law as it is written yet, but allowing players to make money off their time as an athlete in college is the right thing to do.
I have thought that was the correct decision previously and usually I think law makers in California are high before deciding on a law, but this one I agree with.
Let markets dictate how much an athlete can make. If a car dealer wants to hire Austin Kendall to do a commercial, there should be no problem with that. If the 3rd string kicker wants to sit outside in front of Walmart and charge little kids a dollar to take a pic with him, then fine.
If an attractive female soccer player wants to do modeling work, why not?
The majority of athletes are not going to get offers for their likeness because the return on investment for those willing to pay them is not going to be there.
The market will dictate who gets what.
And when team mates no longer want to block for a guy getting paid while they don’t get paid yet put in the same amount of work and his performance falls off as a result, then so be it.
There will be negative consequences to this ruling just as there is with any ruling. We will just have to wait and see what it is.