ADVERTISEMENT

The Climatista's Green Fairy Tale Continues to Implode

Which is great news for West Virginia. Perhaps some of those unemployed lefties on this board should consider a career in mining. I doubt they are earning much from their LGBTQI Only Fans sites

Coal Use on Track for All Time High
Coal is cheap, plentiful, and now with new advances in "clean coal" burning technology is even more practical for the environment. The Left maniacally hates coal, so speeding up use of these promising new "clean coal" technologies will take strong political leadership backed by the demand for more low cost energy.

The good news is that's exactly part of what Trump is running on, cheap, abundant, domestically produced energy fueled in part by good old U.S. coal.

I'm all for it!
iu


...more on clean coal technology


excerpt:
One of the most promising new technologies starts with pulverized coal, a dry mix the consistency of talcum powder that’s already burned in many coal-fired power plants. The pulverized coal is mixed with partially rusted iron particles the size of ice cream sprinkles inside a hot reactor at 1,650 degrees Fahrenheit. The coal-iron mixture undergoes a chemical reaction that removes the rust and produces carbon dioxide and steam, which is then cooled and liquid water condenses out, leaving a highly purified stream of carbon dioxide.

The rust-free iron particles then move to a second reactor, where they are burned under air, causing them to rust again. This rusting reaction produces enough heat to boil water, and the resulting steam drives an electricity-producing turbine.

The carbon-capturing material does not need to be separately heated to liberate pure carbon dioxide, as it does in amine scrubbing, and for that reason “the capture energy requirements are almost negligible,” explains Liang-Shih Fan, the Ohio State University chemical engineer who spearheaded this research.
 
US coal production fell dramatically under Trump. Coming back under Biden.




What is it anyway with you Trumpers? Leave him alone...he's only repeating what he's been told to say...just like me!
iu

Well at least he's not being told to be as creepy as you are Joe....not yet anyway? 🤔
 
@Soaring Eagle 74 so how can you give creepy Joe credit for a policy on increased use of coal when he's already promising to shut all coal fired plants down? I know you won't answer me, but do you even think about some of the asinine things you post before posting them or are you just that lobotomized by the sycophant propaganda media which programs virtually everything you blurt out?

(you don't have to answer that either, your non answer means "yes" you are a media lobotomized vidiot) :rolleyes:

@soaring Eagle just being honest with himself
giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Coal is cheap, plentiful, and now with new advances in "clean coal" burning technology is even more practical for the environment. The Left maniacally hates coal, so speeding up use of these promising new "clean coal" technologies will take strong political leadership backed by the demand for more low cost energy.

The good news is that's exactly part of what Trump is running on, cheap, abundant, domestically produced energy fueled in part by good old U.S. coal.

I'm all for it!
iu


...more on clean coal technology


excerpt:
One of the most promising new technologies starts with pulverized coal, a dry mix the consistency of talcum powder that’s already burned in many coal-fired power plants. The pulverized coal is mixed with partially rusted iron particles the size of ice cream sprinkles inside a hot reactor at 1,650 degrees Fahrenheit. The coal-iron mixture undergoes a chemical reaction that removes the rust and produces carbon dioxide and steam, which is then cooled and liquid water condenses out, leaving a highly purified stream of carbon dioxide.

The rust-free iron particles then move to a second reactor, where they are burned under air, causing them to rust again. This rusting reaction produces enough heat to boil water, and the resulting steam drives an electricity-producing turbine.

The carbon-capturing material does not need to be separately heated to liberate pure carbon dioxide, as it does in amine scrubbing, and for that reason “the capture energy requirements are almost negligible,” explains Liang-Shih Fan, the Ohio State University chemical engineer who spearheaded this research.
This will probably never work on a commercial scale for generation because of the capital and operating costs. By the way, another word for rust is iron oxide.

What they are talking about is the old (late 1800’s, early 1900’s) town gas or water gas technology. Introduce steam to coke in reducing conditions to produce a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen … very combustible. Used for street lights. The reason that many cities in the Northeast had their own coke ovens.

Blast furnace technology. Coke from coal removes oxygen from iron oxide to produce molten iron.

In the end, carbon dioxide is produced from burning coal, and this process does nothing to address that issue. To sequester the CO2, requires a lot of electricity to cool and compress the hot CO2 gas, tripling the cost of the electricity produced.

You won’t see this technology used to generate electricity in your lifetime or in your great grandchildren’s lifetimes. Maybe there will be a chemical processing application in you grandchildren’s lifetimes, like the Eastman plant in Tennessee.
 
This will probably never work on a commercial scale for generation because of the capital and operating costs. By the way, another word for rust is iron oxide.

What they are talking about is the old (late 1800’s, early 1900’s) town gas or water gas technology. Introduce steam to coke in reducing conditions to produce a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen … very combustible. Used for street lights. The reason that many cities in the Northeast had their own coke ovens.

Blast furnace technology. Coke from coal removes oxygen from iron oxide to produce molten iron.

In the end, carbon dioxide is produced from burning coal, and this process does nothing to address that issue. To sequester the CO2, requires a lot of electricity to cool and compress the hot CO2 gas, tripling the cost of the electricity produced.

You won’t see this technology used to generate electricity in your lifetime or in your great grandchildren’s lifetimes. Maybe there will be a chemical processing application in you grandchildren’s lifetimes, like the Eastman plant in Tennessee.
Maybe, maybe not? Let the clean coal technology go forward. The point is we're not going to get by relying on foreign sources for our energy production. We need to generate our own energy here and we have plenty of coal, natural gas and oil to do that. We just need to get Leftist restrictions against its use out of the way. Wind and solar are fine, but that technology is also decades away from being cost efficient or in sufficient enough supply to meet our growing energy needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT