ADVERTISEMENT

That wasn't a debate, that was ABC actively campaigning for Harris.

If you are a trumper after the debate you are a moron
All you have to offer is name calling. Yet you can't tell anyone with any modicum of honesty why you're voting for a Communist? 🤔

That's 'cause he is one! 😏
giphy.webp
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mtn1neer
It’s pretty clear to me that Harris won the debate between herself and Trump. The vice president had some help, too. She was aided and abetted by the two ABC News moderators who seemingly felt the need to fact-check virtually everything the former president said while ABC did NOT fact check ANY of several Harris LIES.
Apparently ABC is about to get exposed on this too. Whistleblowers about to give up the goods
 
If you are a trumper after the debate you are a moron
If you're voting for that cacklin' Communist after the debate, you're a lobotimized bot.

@sammyk ...doing his Kamala bot thang:
"vote for Communist Kamala....opportunity society.... men are women, women are men...everyone's the same....vote for Communism...vote for Kamala...."
giphy.webp
 
Last edited:
Trump is going to win and they know it. That's why Garland held a press conference today crying.
The only way they can win is if they cheat. They WILL cheat, but they can't win if it isn't close.

So....

iu

iu

iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gunny46
If you are a trumper after the debate you are a moron
Team Harris said they would like to do another debate...after they claimed victory in the ABC debate.
I wonder what they will say after the next one that Fox and Trump have agreed to do.
My bet is that she will chicken out and NOT agree to any debate with Fox.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gunny46
If you want to see America great again, vote for me!
iu


If you want to see America turned into Venezuela...vote for this cacklin' Communist
iu


We'll be Venezuela in no time too, I'll see to it!
iu
 
Team Harris said they would like to do another debate...after they claimed victory in the ABC debate.
I wonder what they will say after the next one that Fox and Trump have agreed to do.
My bet is that she will chicken out and NOT agree to any debate with Fox.

Let's be honest. That one would be fair but I don't see her having the courage to do it. I want one with Independent Journalist made up of a variety of backgrounds.
 
I really don't see how anyone in their right mind could vote for a Communist anyway! Seriously folks?
iu

That's just it DJT...folks voting for that cacklin' Communist are NOT in their right minds...matter of fact they've been lobotimized by Socialism!

Yeah, well I guess I can't really argue that!
iu
 
Last edited:
September 12, 2024 4:29pm
Former top Clinton adviser calls on ABC to launch internal probe into whether debate was rigged
Veteran Democratic pollster Mark Penn said "I think a review of all their internal texts and emails really should be done [...] to find out to what extent they were planning on, in effect, you know, fact-checking just one candidate and in effect, rigging the outcome of this debate."

Mark Penn, a former top adviser to Bill and Hillary Clinton, called Thursday for ABC to launch a formal internal investigation into its news division's planning and execution of this week's presidential debate to determine if there was some effort at "rigging the outcome of this debate."

ABC News came under significant bipartisan criticism because its moderators fact-checked some of Donald Trump's statements but not a single pushback at any made by Kamala Harris.

Trump said Thursday that the debate was three-on-one and declined to participate in another one before the election.

Anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis moderated the first debate between Harris and Trump, which drew 67.1 million viewers, making it the most watched presidential debate since 2008. But it has drawn scorn from both Republicans and Democrats for giving the appearance of bias.

"I actually think they should do a full internal investigation, hire an outside law firm. I don't know how much of this was planned in advance," Penn told the "John Solomon Reports" podcast.

"I don't know what they told the Harris campaign. I think the day after, suspicion here is really quite high, and I think a review of all their internal texts and emails really should be done by an independent party to find out to what extent they were planning on, in effect, you know, fact-checking just one candidate and in effect, rigging the outcome of this debate. I think the situation demands nothing less than that," he added.

Penn described the mainstream media's coverage of Harris' campaign as laughable.

Penn, president and managing partner of The Stagwell Group, suggested the Trump campaign mail out to every voter the ACLU questionnaire that then-Sen. Harris, D-Calif., filled out and indicated she supports gender surgery for illegal immigrants and defunding Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
 
Let's be honest. That one would be fair but I don't see her having the courage to do it. I want one with Independent Journalist made up of a variety of backgrounds.
I don't want to see anymore "debating"...it's a waste of time. You either know who you're voting for and why at this point, or you're voting for the cacklin' Communist because you don't have a clue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtn1neer
September 12, 2024 4:29pm
Former top Clinton adviser calls on ABC to launch internal probe into whether debate was rigged
Veteran Democratic pollster Mark Penn said "I think a review of all their internal texts and emails really should be done [...] to find out to what extent they were planning on, in effect, you know, fact-checking just one candidate and in effect, rigging the outcome of this debate."

Mark Penn, a former top adviser to Bill and Hillary Clinton, called Thursday for ABC to launch a formal internal investigation into its news division's planning and execution of this week's presidential debate to determine if there was some effort at "rigging the outcome of this debate."

ABC News came under significant bipartisan criticism because its moderators fact-checked some of Donald Trump's statements but not a single pushback at any made by Kamala Harris.

Trump said Thursday that the debate was three-on-one and declined to participate in another one before the election.

Anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis moderated the first debate between Harris and Trump, which drew 67.1 million viewers, making it the most watched presidential debate since 2008. But it has drawn scorn from both Republicans and Democrats for giving the appearance of bias.

"I actually think they should do a full internal investigation, hire an outside law firm. I don't know how much of this was planned in advance," Penn told the "John Solomon Reports" podcast.

"I don't know what they told the Harris campaign. I think the day after, suspicion here is really quite high, and I think a review of all their internal texts and emails really should be done by an independent party to find out to what extent they were planning on, in effect, you know, fact-checking just one candidate and in effect, rigging the outcome of this debate. I think the situation demands nothing less than that," he added.

Penn described the mainstream media's coverage of Harris' campaign as laughable.

Penn, president and managing partner of The Stagwell Group, suggested the Trump campaign mail out to every voter the ACLU questionnaire that then-Sen. Harris, D-Calif., filled out and indicated she supports gender surgery for illegal immigrants and defunding Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
I didn't watch it, and honestly I'm not surprised considering it was ABC. Trump should be aware by now that the Left will stop at nothing, and try anything at this point to keep him from winning back the WH. (including rigging a debate) 😏
 
I didn't watch it, and honestly I'm not surprised considering it was ABC. Trump should be aware by now that the Left will stop at nothing, and try anything at this point to keep him from winning back the WH. (ncluding rigging a debate) 😏

It backfired bigly with Independents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
I didn't watch it, and honestly I'm not surprised considering it was ABC. Trump should be aware by now that the Left will stop at nothing, and try anything at this point to keep him from winning back the WH. (ncluding rigging a debate) 😏
I did NOT watch a second of it live...I knew what was coming. I did watch a lot of the follow up and clips.

The reason I posted earlier that Harris won was because even some fair Fox News people felt she was the winner.

Many of those commentators as well as others on other networks...said the ABC hosts were laughable and were biased...especially with their TOTAL LACK of FACT CHECKING HARRIS.
 
I did NOT watch a second of it live...I knew what was coming. I did watch a lot of the follow up and clips.

The reason I posted earlier that Harris won was because even some fair Fox News people felt she was the winner.

Many of those commentators as well as others on other networks...said the ABC hosts were laughable and were biased...especially with their TOTAL LACK of FACT CHECKING HARRIS.
Again I'm not surprised. Like you I just heard clips the following day, and nothing I heard would have changed my mind anyway.
 
Hey @bornaneer apparently during this debate abortion came up and the cacklin' Communist was asked if she favored any restrictions on it? From what I've heard she never answered, and Trump apparently brought up the issue of late term abortions and how she's not even opposed to those! She apparently said they don't happen, but she never answered the question if she opposes them or not correct?

Don't know if that's true since she's never actually said when they should be restricted but I can't get anyone on the Left to even acknolwedge late term abortions are routinely done in this country!

So my qusetion to any one of them brave or honest enough to answer is this:

"if it's so rare, or so terrible & no one supports it, why don't we just we ban it then?"

Ans from the Left:
giphy.webp
 
Trump is going to win and they know it. That's why Garland held a press conference today crying.
I agree he should win. They are not going to go down without a fight and it won't be fighting to get people to vote for them because they won't win that fight
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
I agree he should win. They are not going to go down without a fight and it won't be fighting to get people to vote for them because they won't win that fight

People will just have to go watch the press conference Garland did today. It will make more sense over the next several months why he did it. He's not above criticism. So people should continue to do so because regardless of what he said he's a partisan hack. If he wants to change his legacy I suggest he get fvcking do so ASAP. I won't hold my breath.
 
People will just have to go watch the press conference Garland did today. It will make more sense over the next several months why he did it. He's not above criticism. So people should continue to do so because regardless of what he said he's a partisan hack. If he wants to change his legacy I suggest he get fvcking do so ASAP. I won't hold my breath.
Is there a link somewhere?
 
People will just have to go watch the press conference Garland did today. It will make more sense over the next several months why he did it. He's not above criticism. So people should continue to do so because regardless of what he said he's a partisan hack. If he wants to change his legacy I suggest he get fvcking do so ASAP. I won't hold my breath.
He’s a dumbass with a grudge against Trump for not allowing him to become a SCOTUS Justice after Obama selected him at the end of his term. He’s also sore Trump shitcanned his buddy Comey. How ironic he whines that Trump claims his department is politically weaponized against Trump and that is dangerous rhetoric and puts them in danger. After all their rhetoric against Trump the last 8 years. I mean, good lord
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
He’s a dumbass with a grudge against Trump for not allowing him to become a SCOTUS Justice after Obama selected him at the end of his term. He’s also sore Trump shitcanned his buddy Comey. How ironic he whines that Trump claims his department is politically weaponized against Trump and that is dangerous rhetoric and puts them in danger. After all their rhetoric against Trump the last 8 years. I mean, good lord

Well said. Like I said if he wants to reverse course and do the right thing. He's running out of time. Harris if she wins she's going a different direction and will appoint someone even more radical. He knows his days are numbered either way as AG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
He’s a dumbass with a grudge against Trump for not allowing him to become a SCOTUS Justice after Obama selected him at the end of his term. He’s also sore Trump shitcanned his buddy Comey. How ironic he whines that Trump claims his department is politically weaponized against Trump and that is dangerous rhetoric and puts them in danger. After all their rhetoric against Trump the last 8 years. I mean, good lord


When Trey Gowdy is on after that speech calling out the DOJ and actually being harsh. You know it's bad.
 
Trump pisses off the elite ruling class because he doesn't owe his success to them. He's too independent and outspoken.

They hate anyone who can be successful without their permission. That's why they despise him. He can't be bought or bribed like creepy Joe Biden was.

I wasn't bought and paid for...I sold myself to the higgest bidder!
iu
As stated numerous times before Trump comes off as being arrogant, but through his business model he lifts those around him to new heights. He negotiates the issues which affect his business and signs the deal when he is satisfied with his cut of the deal. Those who hate him get caught up in his "I am the best thin since fried balogna" and forget that he brings them a sandwich at the same time. We need him back in the White House with his negotiation ability and reject Kommi Kammi for her promise to show us her plans after she becomes POTUS ...... Plan sounds like an old Obama plan that had thousands of pages and said the house had to pass the package before they could find out what was in the law....
 
  • Like
Reactions: mtn1neer
As stated numerous times before Trump comes off as being arrogant, but through his business model he lifts those around him to new heights. He negotiates the issues which affect his business and signs the deal when he is satisfied with his cut of the deal. Those who hate him get caught up in his "I am the best thin since fried balogna" and forget that he brings them a sandwich at the same time. We need him back in the White House with his negotiation ability and reject Kommi Kammi for her promise to show us her plans after she becomes POTUS ...... Plan sounds like an old Obama plan that had thousands of pages and said the house had to pass the package before they could find out what was in the law....
Americans have to come to grips with reality and accept the current federal government is corrupt. And msm is only their tool to keep your head in the sand. Forget everything they’ve told you the last 8 years. Turn them off. Show up in Nov and vote Trump. Best advice you’ll hear pre election
 




However, not all New York City councilmembers are happy about the bills.

"I’ll move before I’ll pay," Minority Leader Joseph Borelli told the New York Post. Borelli was one of the 8 councilmembers to vote against the legislation.

"If they can introduce me to one New Yorker who owned a slave I’d be happy to consider it," he added. "But until then, I am not paying a dime as a reparation for a harm I did not cause, nor condone, nor once participated in."


MEDIA

NYC council passes slavery reparations legislation to 'yield material solutions' from US history​

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT