hypocrisy
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Originally posted by dave:
When someone pointed out something a ridiculous politician from maine did you got on your hugh horse and scolded everyone for suggesting one person represents a party. I guess when you disagree with a crazy person your earlier stance is jull and void. Congrats on being a massive hypocrite.
1) I didn't scold anybody, and if you want to claim I did, it would have only been the one person that suggested that the ridiculous politician from Maine represented the whole party or the whole side. Further, I probably admonished what the Maine politician said (I don't remember the issue you are referring to)
2) I have not made any such claim in this post. Not once have I suggested that this person represents everybody on the right. Not once. What I have said is that since this person is on the right WVPATX won't admit that this person is wrong. Which is not a hypocritical statement, it is true, as he still has not admitted this is wrong, he has just continually deflected the subject.
Your point is completely invalid. And your only point was a personal attack. Thank you for contributing what you could to the conversation.
EDIT: It took me awhile to even remember what I would have said about any Maine politician. Now I recall that the politician in question made some kind of comment that Obama's family were ISIS members or something like that. If I "got on my hugh horse" (I don't have a horse, but if I did I would probably name it Mable or Cecil, but certainly not Hugh) scolding anybody for suggesting one person represents a party it would have been in defense of those on the right.
So, your point is even more invalid than I originally thought. SSWWWIIIIIIINNNGGG and a miss!!
This post was edited on 3/30 9:14 AM by WhiteTailEER