Share with everyone you know about the real Kamala Harris and Tim Walz
- Thread starter Gunny46
- Start date
Also makes sense.
Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump. As someone who’s in the online entertainment business for 15+ years & literally knows & talks to everyone. What I’m about to tell you is
confirmed facts
Kamala Harris has been offering many influencers serious money to help promote her & her campaign. The amount being offered I have seen has been low as $1500 to close to a half a million dollars per influencer. We’re talking Twitch streamers, YouTubers , TikTokers, big IG accounts, ect. VS
Trump campaign isn’t offering any money to influencers & many influencers are actually donating their money to the Trump campaign
Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump. As someone who’s in the online entertainment business for 15+ years & literally knows & talks to everyone. What I’m about to tell you is
Gov. Walz Endorses Ilhan Omar And Incumbent DFL U.S Representatives Ahead Of Minnesota Primary
As the Minnesota primary fast approaches, Gov. Tim Walz and Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan announced they will endorsing the incumbent DFL congressional representatives for reelection.
www.cbsnews.com
Gov. Walz Endorses Ilhan Omar And Incumbent DFL U.S Representatives Ahead Of Minnesota Primary
For hundreds of years, liberals have been fierce opponents of authoritarianism. It has traditionally been liberals, not conservatives, who fought against restrictions on free speech, defended the right to privacy from the government, and fought abuses of power by government agencies. In contrast, conservatives have placed a higher value on maintaining social order and upholding traditional moral hierarchies
But increasingly, it’s been liberal politicians who have demanded authoritarian restrictions on free speech and personal freedom. In December 2022, Democratic Vice Presidential candidate and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz claimed, “There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech and especially around our democracy.” In fact, the First Amendment protects both. And in 2020, Walz implemented a Covid snitch line and encouraged residents to report violations of pandemic restrictions.
It turns out he wasn’t alone. The Civil Rights Department of California Governor Gavin Newsom introduced last year a snitch line and urged citizens to report their fellow citizens for alleged hate speech. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has called for greater censorship of social media platforms, and British police have over the last few days arrested three people for what they posted online. And Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has demanded greater online censorship, froze bank accounts of protesting truckers, and is pushing legislation that could send a person to prison for life for speech.
Each of those men would defend such measures as required for public safety. They would argue that misinformation and hate speech online lead to real-world violence like the riots we have seen in Britain. COVID-19 transmission threatened public health. And something had to be done to peacefully end the trucker protest.
But none of those measures was required because there were other ways to deal with those problems. It is a gross simplification to attribute Britain’s recent riots to online misinformation and the best antidote to misinformation remains good information, not censorship. There was never any reason to think that people outside not wearing masks were a sufficient threat to public health to justify a snitch line reminiscent of Communist totalitarianism, violating both privacy and personal liberty. And, the government had other ways to end the trucker protest and indeed used them, making the bank freezing a gratuitous and authoritarian overreach.
What’s more, the authoritarian measures imposed by these leaders were highly selective in nature. None of the four politicians named demanded censorship of the misinformation and hate speech that spread after the killing of George Floyd, which one could argue contributed to the Black Lives Matter (BLM) riots as much if not more than the ones over the last week in Britain. Nor have the politicians called for censorship to halt the sharp increase of illegal migration. And all of the politicians have adopted a different standard of policing of protests by BLM and other left-wing causes than for anti-immigration, Freedom Convoy truckers, and right-wing ones, which some have called “two-tier” policing.
In the case of gender, liberal politicians have pursued anarchy for medical professionals and tyranny for anyone who stands in the way of so-called “gender-affirming care.” On the one hand, liberal politicians like Walz and Newsom have championed the right of medical professionals to block puberty, prescribe cross-sex hormones, and perform surgeries. On the other, they have increasingly taken over from parents the right to decide what happens to their children.
As such, liberal politicians like Walz, Newsom, Trudeau, and Starmer are simultaneously creating greater authoritarianism and greater anarchy. This is in stark contrast to liberals in the past who fought authoritarianism and demanded greater free speech, personal freedom, and privacy. What exactly happened? How did liberals become advocates of anarcho-tyranny?
Last edited:
UK government 'scouring social media' to arrest people for sharing 'harmful' riot footage regardless of intent
A news correspondent warned that the government of the United Kingdom is actively cracking down on people who have shared footage of the recent wave of protests.
UK government 'scouring social media' to arrest people for sharing 'harmful' riot footage regardless of intent
'People might think they're not doing anything harmful. They are. And the consequences will be visited upon them,' the Director of Public Prosecutions said
Fair enough.
For the record, this isn’t an endorsement. This is me saying that I like RFKjr as a person, and I really appreciate the way he discusses things with civility and intelligence. I think we could use more of that in this world. I also think Trump raising his fist and saying “fight!” after getting shot is one of the most American ****ing things of all time. I’m not the guy to get political information from. If you want that from a comic, go to
@ComicDaveSmith
. He actually knows what he’s talking about.
I'm good. I understand it's good for buisness to get Harris/Walz to mock. But her getting 8 years to laugh and cackle on TV constantly isn't funny.
If true can't afford to waste your vote unless you want Harris_Walz. Why risk it?
www.foxnews.com
Trump, Harris in dead heat in poll of 7 critical battleground states
Former President Donald Trump and current Vice President Kamala Harris are locked in a dead heat battle for the seven swing states expected to decide the election, according to a poll from Ipsos.
