I fully believe him when he says that he has two sources saying the same thing. I really do.
But the case with the Dude is that however many sources he actually has there is usually more to the story. It's that simple. He often has a "part" of the story, but rarely has the whole story.
have you seen social media today. Everyone talking about losing and the hand slap. its getting crazy now. He better win this weekHe's really going out on a limb by saying people aren't happy with the direction of the program after a 4 game losing streak - 3 of them blowouts.
He's a complete and total fraud.
uhh my post was sarcasm.have you seen social media today. Everyone talking about losing and the hand slap. its getting crazy now. He better win this week
And complete and total frauds use sources.
The Dude is like a wave at the shore. You can stand around waiting for it to crash. Or you can grab your board and have a little fun.
WVU to SEC = done deal
This is the perfect example of the Dude having part of and not the whole story. I think it has been pretty well established after the fact that WVU was in some kind of contention for the SEC. The Dude jumped the gun and then shot himself in the foot.
If he says he has sources he has sources. Who exactly and how thorough are up for debate.
If he was a complete and total fraud then Mike Casazza would have never gone on the Dude's internet radio station/show. Get it? Casazza, a respected and reputable reporter did internet radio (still does?) with the Dude not all that long ago.
Here is a transcript of a program that the Dude and Casazza did on conference realignment a few years ago. TRANSCRIPT
The Dude has sources. He just reports things before he has the whole story. It makes for good entertainment.
You just can't take him too seriously one way or the other. The stuff he reports is usually "fluid." Just don't be a sucker and assume that any of it is frozen.,
I think the internet is a more interesting place because of him. Don't be mad at him just because you wanted a lot of his past info to be frozen in time.
Gee instructing Lyons to terminate AD personnel based on performance is laughable. Tressel being a top prospect is even funnier.
Gee is tight and popular with some Big Boosters. You don't think he would never say something like, "Unless Dana pulls out X number of wins we're facing the loss of some significant support."
It's laughable that you would think Gee, a very active and popular president, would never have that kind of conversation. And Tressel will always be linked to Gee. Just what it is.
He's a nobody.
If he says he has sources then he has sources? LOL! You know who he really is, right? Let me guess, you take financial advice from your pizza delivery man?
Then Lyons is AD in title only. This is his task to perform, and be evaluated on the outcome.
You act like I take everything he says as being Gospel Truth! I don't. I NEVER HAVE! And that's the difference between me and lot of you. Some of you bought his act hook, line, and sinker and now you're mad at him because you believed him at one time. I think he's nerdy wannabe internet journalist. I just choose to not be offended by him.
Fact is: Casazza did internet radio with him. He has/had sources. But I would never accept what he and his sources report as the whole story. Never have; never will.
There's no gray area with you guys. He's a guy on the internet. Sometimes he provides interesting and useful information. Just don't hang your hat on his hook.
So if the president of a university goes to his AD and says, "Unless this thing gets turned around we'll have to take action because we're gonna have a big problem if we don't" the AD is an AD in title only.
Right. Got it.
I guess if the president addresses any perceived big problem with any department head that department head is just a department head in title only.
You can't make up this stuff.
"Fraud", is that code for Rich Rod?He's a complete and total fraud.
Read what your BFF actually wrote and see if you notice the difference.
You are asking me to go back and compare what I wrote with what was written by a person that I insist never quite has the full story and spot the difference? You think about that.
I don't care what he writes or how convincing he is. Even if he is in the ballpark he doesn't have the full story. But when he does talk about something it's usually because there is something there. It's just never the full story.
Do you see what you are doing? You are taking what he writes at face value even as you call him a fraud.
Let me spell it out for you .... if the Dude says he has two sources that "say" Gee has said "this, this, and this" to Lyons about Hologorsen it means that there are two people, who have some connection to the athletic department, who have told the dude that Gee has expressed a level of concern to Lyons and somehow the number 8 factors in. That leaves a lot of room for possible variations of a conversation. But the Dude gets it and reports it as Gee said "this, this, and this." He reports bits and pieces of open ended situations and makes it sound the final word.
You gotta laugh at the dude and you gotta laugh at people who get bent out of shape over him.
Let's parse the Dude farther .... he says Gee "will instruct" Lyons to fire Holgorsen if such and such. So what if that actually happens? Does that mean Lyons is obligated to do it? NO! Of course not.Get it?
You insist he is a fraud and yet you still hang on his words.
As far as I am concerned the Dude is just part of the zany landscape that makes up Mountaineer Nation. If you can't laugh at him and his effect on people then you take him way to serious.
Me? I'll be looking for the next puzzle piece he floats. Should be fun.
I can't think of anything else I could say on this matter.
Let's see .... I come out and directly say that I find the Dude to be entertaining; that I laugh at him and laugh at his effect on people AND Darth makes the bold statement that I have an "affinity" for him. How did he ever figure that out?
CE4 compares him with the National Enquirer and I have said that the Dude is entertaining and never quite has the whole story. Hmmmm?
Next thing you guys will stop by my house, knock on the door, and tell me my grass is green.
BTW ... if he is an absolute 100 % fraud why would Casazza, a respected and reliable journalist, even associate with such a guy in his internet ventures?
You can't make up this stuff. You just can't.
I'm sorry that he broke your hearts in the past because you were foolish enough to believe what he was reporting was final.
Tressel will have to get approval from NCAA to get the last year of his probation taken away. funny thing is Ollie Luck will handle that case. I don't think Rod even gets a look but Tressel's name is being tossed around. Things are starting to heat up.Gee instructing Lyons to terminate AD personnel based on performance is laughable. Tressel being a top prospect is even funnier.
Tressel will have to get approval from NCAA to get the last year of his probation taken away. funny thing is Ollie Luck will handle that case. I don't think Rod even gets a look but Tressel's name is being tossed around. Things are starting to heat up.