Open meme. Tell me what you see? What you should see is the same groups like Antifa and others that I have warned about preying on Veterans with mental illness to snap and do something that advances their cause. It's basic psychological operations. 20 or more Veterans a day are committing suicide. Anarchist groups target them.
Still waiting. What's the difference? Speech vs. Guns. Not sure why you think this is a "negotiation". It's a question.This isn't a negotiation.
Annnd he had Tick Tock videos stating the U.S. Army and US Government had ruined his life and he was going to get revenge. Anyone who encouraged him directly should be worried.
Still waiting. What's the difference? Speech vs. Guns.
Do you believe a person's words can cause more harm than a gun (Assault rifle)?Still not a negotiation.
Do you believe a person's words can cause more harm than a gun (Assault rifle)?
So words are more dangerous?My Rifles and guns are not going to hurt anyone. They are safely secured. I'm not mentally ill and have no intentions of harming innocent people. Enforce the laws already on book. There's a huge difference on free speech and people using message boards and social media to incite violence. Stop playing dumb.
So words are more dangerous?
Why do you hate the First Amendment so much? Why do you favor abolishing it?Are you still running your mouth? FFS STFU you're not changing anyone's right now.
Why do you hate the First Amendment so much? Why do you favor abolishing it?
I'm not wanting to get rid of the First Amendment. That's you. Shame.You working on an insanity plea deal or trying for the too stupid to stand trial?
I'm not wanting to get rid of the First Amendment. That's you. Shame.
Show me a gun that has hurt a person without a person using it .it takes a person to load and fire . The guns are not the problem....Do you believe a person's words can cause more harm than a gun (Assault rifle)?
Can you link me your outrage for Trump saying that parts of the Constitution should be suspended because he didn't like the results? Thanks.
Cool story. A person yelling "fire" causes a reaction that could result in death, the same as someone pulling the trigger of a gun they loaded with the same intent.Show me a gun that has hurt a person without a person using it .it takes a person to load and fire . The guns are not the problem....
Yelling fire in a crowded theater or pulling a fire alarm when there is no fire is way different than a gun . Yes we have free speech unless it goes against democrats narrative. Twitter files proved this .
Can't take my rights away because we refuse to lock people up who are crazy . By the way ....only law abiding citizen will give up guns ...
Biden needs to worry about the border . I bet more people get killed every year by illegals than AR 15..... just saying....
A person gets into trouble for yelling fire ...a person ...Cool story. A person yelling "fire" causes a reaction that could result to death, the same as someone pulling the trigger of a gun they loaded with the same intent.
Now, I don't think anywhere have I said to take guns away. But restrictions????? Why not. Worked for First Amendment. Just ask your "leader".
Y’all have any opinion on Black Rain Ordinance rifles?
BRO-FALLOUT10-SI - Black Rain Ordnance, Inc.
Black Rain Ordnance manufacturing standards are prominent throughout our line of Spec Series weapons, allowing us to produce the highest quality rifle with a cost-effective price tag. The chromoly barrels and black nitride bolt-carrier groups in the Spec Series combine to provide the reliability...blackrainordnance.com
You fail to understand that the "word" "FIRE" didn't hurt anyone, either, the person yelling it did. But yet the Supreme Court defined speech. My point. Same can happen to Second.A person gets into trouble for yelling fire ...a person ...
That person is trying to harm others or incite a riot ...
A gun does not hurt anyone....it's a person who is hurting someone just using a gun ..
Totally different situation.
You fail to see the problem....it's people had changed and we as a society stopped putting people up .
So you want to restrict assault weapons, correct?
What's the definition of a assault weapon? ....let me guess, we let the same people protecting our borders and telling us ...mandating...we wear masks and take a vaccine and silencing free speech and has us trillions in debt decide.... talk about letting the fox guard the henhouse...
If they cared any at all our borders would be secure .... I mean that is a job they are supposed to be doing
You fail to understand that the "word" "FIRE" didn't hurt anyone, either, the person yelling it did. But yet the Supreme Court defined speech. My point. Same can happen to Second.
Don't get bitchy if/when Supreme Court defines "illegal weapons or non-2nd weapons" under the Second Amendment.If you break the law with either one you go to jail. We need to enforce the laws we already have. Now go sit in the corner.
Don't get bitchy if/when Supreme Court defines "illegal weapons or non-2nd weapons" under the Second Amendment.
You have your 2nd Amendment. It doesn't mean the Supreme Court cannot define what "weapon" you are allowed to own legally.I said enforce the laws in place. You have freedom of speech. You don't get to harrass people to the point they hurt themselves or others. Now go take your meds.
You have your 2nd Amendment. It doesn't mean the Supreme Court cannot define what "weapon" you are allowed to own legally.
Damn. You are gross. I don't go that way. Plenty of other guys do. Good luck.We can cross that bridge then. Right now what I said still goes with running your suck.
Damn. You are gross. I don't go that way. Plenty of other guys do. Good luck.
Ummm.....never intended to do that. Don't care either. Facts are facts. The Supreme Court could, if they wanted, conduct a revision of the Second Amendment. My point remains valid: none of the Amendments are solid and all can be revisited based upon the needs of society.Congratulations on wasting alot of your time and you still haven't changed anyone's mind.
Ummm.....never intended to do that. Don't care either. Facts are facts. The Supreme Court could, if they wanted, conduct a revision of the Second Amendment. My point remains valid: none of the Amendments are solid and all can be revisited based upon the needs of society.
Remember, it's a "flexible" document for a reason.
Trump may do it if he's elected. He supports suspension of the Constitution.Your CCP friends would love that. I know your Hamas buddies did.
Trump may do it if he's elected. He supports suspension of the Constitution.
I don’t disagree, especially the H&K’s. However I have a unique opportunity to get the BRO from Cabelas as a gift without the option to be used elsewhere for a firearm. Don’t really want another pistol but also looking at a Glock 19 with Holosun SCS sight.
“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution"He won't. Biden has already said he wants to.
I don’t disagree, especially the H&K’s. However I have a unique opportunity to get the BRO from Cabelas as a gift without the option to be used elsewhere for a firearm. Don’t really want another pistol but also looking at a Glock 19 with Holosun SCS sight.
“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution"
Didn't know that was Biden who said that. Thanks.