Lamar Jackson ! " We ain't no stinkin 'UK or Texas A & M,
- Thread starter Tonycried
- Start date
You have to give Louisville some credit here. They're a P5 program that's not afraid to travel to Huntington to take on a G5 powerhouse. Not to mention, they've had no success against the Herd for what? 3 decades or so?
You don't hear their fans moaning and groaning over a football game. No excuses there. Nice to see teams sack up and play the game without having to invent reasons why not to play.
You don't hear their fans moaning and groaning over a football game. No excuses there. Nice to see teams sack up and play the game without having to invent reasons why not to play.
I totally agree, I give the Cards credit for wanting to play a competitive non-conference slate. They haven't beaten us in over 30 years but at least they're not chickenshit! I tell you, Jackson is an explosive player so we'll have our hands full!
Compare and contrast that against WVU's success against Marshall over the past 100 years.... Seriously, do it. I see no relevance in comparing WVU v Marshall and Louisville v Marshall.. Difference, you've won one against Louisville. I'd venture to guess, you have a losing, all time, record against the Cards and I'm quite confident WVU has a sizable winning record against the Cards. I guess we could look it up.
None of which will mean anything to Lamar Jackson, one of the most explosive players in college football....you boys are welcome to schedule them and find out for yourselves but more likely W & M is in your future!
Be glad to. However, we already have 4/5 top 25 teams on our schedule and OOC opponents in Missouri and BYU.
You boys should be stoked playing a pre season top 25 for the first time in what? Since you played WVU?
You boys should be stoked playing a pre season top 25 for the first time in what? Since you played WVU?
I'm just glad we don't have to play ODU ... talk about a power house.
Hahahahaha....YSU probably better than BYU or Mizzou. Saw the Tigers up close and personal @ Kentucky and they were 100% woeful! WVU 52 Mizzou 12.
Neither of us can control conference games...which is why I can't jump you about ISU or KU!
http://www.fbschedules.com/2015/03/2015-college-football-strength-of-schedule-ncaa-method/
"Marshall, which won the Conference USA championship last season, has the easiest schedule according to the NCAA."
"Marshall, which won the Conference USA championship last season, has the easiest schedule according to the NCAA."
Last edited:
Pitt beat you every year from 1929-1946 and from 1976-1982 and owns a 61-40-3 record. Want to argue if they own you or not?
idiot...1976-82 they beat everybody...
1929-1946... looks like they owned us during that time...
between 1938-1962... 4 of 22 games were 'home games'... we played most of those losses in Pittsburgh 42 of 64...we won 19 of 39 home games
like being 0-12 against certain teams = owned
the mooooooo is 20-33 vs ohioU
12-30 vs Miami Ohio
1929-1946... looks like they owned us during that time...
between 1938-1962... 4 of 22 games were 'home games'... we played most of those losses in Pittsburgh 42 of 64...we won 19 of 39 home games
like being 0-12 against certain teams = owned
the mooooooo is 20-33 vs ohioU
12-30 vs Miami Ohio
Last edited:
And still ranked higher for back to back to back years.![[banana]](https://res-5.cloudinary.com/rivals/image/upload/qo9fu1unj7ctwin1ayii.gif "banana [banana]")
Neither WVU nor Marshall was ranked this year.
You haven't played a team with a pulse in a long time.
It is February, most of us have basketball seasons to focus on...... most of us.
I don't give you grief for playing those powerhouses, I get that they're charter members of your conference....but I reserve the right to point out the obvious, namely that they can't play a lick and that WVU should be expected to wipe the field with those Neds!But you do anyway.
It's stupid shit like this that keeps me coming back. Thank you.
You do realise that you were scheduled because they think it is an easy win....don't you? Fodder....nothing more....LOL
Similar threads
