Kamala BUSTED Using AI

[Gunny46]

 

[NYC_Eer]

Yes...thank you for starting this:

According to XRVision a comparison of similar verified images, such as those by the AP, reveals that the image has an inconsistent field of view geometry, depth and width, proportions, and lighting.

SNOPES reportedly examined the image and reported that it is “unproven” if the image is not authentic.

SNOPES claims they ran the image through an AI Detector and the results came back 96% human or likely photographed by someone at the event.

However, XRVision ran the same photo through an AI Detector several times, and the results came back as 76%, 79%, 78%, 79%, and 80% likely AI-generated.

The AI detection program gave it a NSFW label meaning “Not Suitable for Work” or, in other words, IT IS NOT LIKELY A REAL PHOTO!… And ‘Stay Away.”

So now we know that there is no depth of deception Democrats will not go to push their unlikeable and failed candidates.

Nothing is real with these people. Nothing is honest.

They have no integrity.

And SNOPES, a company founded by a degenerate who blew nearly $100 grand of company money on hookers, is caught once again playing cleanup for the Democrat liars.

Looks like MAGA, the Washington Times and XRVision have been down this road before: https://mashable.com/article/xrvision-facial-recognition-antifa-trump-capitol-evidence-debunk

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/533168-washington-times-retracts-article-claiming-facial-recognition-company/

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-facialrecognition-antifa/fact-check-facial-recognition-company-did-not-identify-antifa-members-among-capitol-mob-idUSKBN29D2WV/

"It should be noted that XRVision is a shady entity and there is very little evidence that they produce functional facial recognition software.

XRVision's CTO, Yaacov Apelbaum has a lengthy history online connecting him to right-wing conspiracy theories. Apelbaum runs a blog that has been shared by far right-wing outlets like The Gateway Pundit and by Q, of QAnon fame."

 

[Gunny46]

Looks like MAGA, the Washington Times and XRVision have been down this road before: https://mashable.com/article/xrvision-facial-recognition-antifa-trump-capitol-evidence-debunk

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/533168-washington-times-retracts-article-claiming-facial-recognition-company/

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-facialrecognition-antifa/fact-check-facial-recognition-company-did-not-identify-antifa-members-among-capitol-mob-idUSKBN29D2WV/

"It should be noted that XRVision is a shady entity and there is very little evidence that they produce functional facial recognition software.

XRVision's CTO, Yaacov Apelbaum has a lengthy history online connecting him to right-wing conspiracy theories. Apelbaum runs a blog that has been shared by far right-wing outlets like The Gateway Pundit and by Q, of QAnon fame."

It's going to be close no matter what. I encourage those that don't want Harris and Walz elected to ignore this distraction and get out and vote.

 

[Mntneer]

 

[Mntneer]

LOL. Even Fox News debunked this. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tr...ide-air-force-two-despite-video-images-crowds. I wouldn't die on that hill if I were MAGA

It's the depth of field. The picture was taken to make it appear people were close to the plane. Anyone with a brain knows that is not going to happen. The crowd was back towards the hanger, a distance from the plane, taken with the right depth of field from a low angle and it appears that there are a ton of people there next to the plane.

Trump and the Reps need to move on from it. It's not a winning argument that is going to get them votes.

 

[Gunny46]

It's the depth of field. The picture was taken to make it appear people were close to the plane. Anyone with a brain knows that is not going to happen. The crowd was back towards the hanger, a distance from the plane, taken with the right depth of field from a low angle and it appears that there are a ton of people there next to the plane.

Trump and the Reps need to move on from it. It's not a winning argument that is going to get them votes.

Point it out and don't waste a bunch of time on it.

 

[moe]

This isn't AI.