ADVERTISEMENT

I guess the latest wingnut conspiracy has been debunked

Lol, they have all three branches and can't do shit except opine for the days when all they had to do was "oppose" Obama and Hillary. Life is so unfair for the poor persecuted Christian white folk GOP base, maybe it's time to realize your schtick doesn't play in America anymore. I worked at Fort Belvoir for two weeks last month and was heartened by the diversity of our active duty troops and civilian military personnel. Hijab wearing gas station attendants, Hispanic, Asian and black American troops in numbers equal to their white brothers. Only folks dividing America are the ones with the message that is admired by the Nazis and KKK. Check out who just won office in Oklahoma, the blue wave stirred up by Trump really gonna piss you off. Roy Moore still running?
 
None have gotten 140 million and none have as many shady deals as the corrupt Clintons have over the last 40 years. I'm glad you realize that the Clintons take bribes, and here I thought you were hard to convince they were crooked.

Yeah sort of the like that political "Christian" family in Lynchburg VA that has enriched themselves handsomely on the donations of politically connected Christians. Or the family of Billy Graham that have done the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RichardPeterJohnson
Is it your goal to see how many times you can be wrong per day? If so, you're having yet another good day.
Wherever the Clinton's have gone, corruption has been close behind.
 
Shep with the EPIC BEATDOWN. Dayum!

I look for Faux News to fire him in the not too distant future.
 
Yeah sort of the like that political "Christian" family in Lynchburg VA that has enriched themselves handsomely on the donations of politically connected Christians. Or the family of Billy Graham that have done the same.
Has that political family ever been elected to office? Come on, we are talking about two people who have done nothing but suck off the teat of the american people. enrich themselves from political influence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Has that political family ever been elected to office? Come on, we are talking about two people who have done nothing but suck off the teat of the american people. enrich themselves from political influence.
Did you complain when Ronald Reagan accepted $2 million in 1989 from Japanese interests to give two speeches after leaving office (coincidentally the Jap made out pretty well under RR in trade deals)? How about W and his $15 million speaking tour? You act as though the Clinton's enriching themselves because of who they are is unique to them. It isn't.
 
Did you complain when Ronald Reagan accepted $2 million in 1989 from Japanese interests to give two speeches after leaving office (coincidentally the Jap made out pretty well under RR in trade deals)? How about W and his $15 million speaking tour? You act as though the Clinton's enriching themselves because of who they are is unique to them. It isn't.
If only they could get one of these dumbfvck allegations to stick.....
 
Did you complain when Ronald Reagan accepted $2 million in 1989 from Japanese interests to give two speeches after leaving office (coincidentally the Jap made out pretty well under RR in trade deals)? How about W and his $15 million speaking tour? You act as though the Clinton's enriching themselves because of who they are is unique to them. It isn't.

Was Nancy acting Sec of State at the time? Was Laura a sitting Senator.

I'm a banana!
 
Did you complain when Ronald Reagan accepted $2 million in 1989 from Japanese interests to give two speeches after leaving office (coincidentally the Jap made out pretty well under RR in trade deals)? How about W and his $15 million speaking tour? You act as though the Clinton's enriching themselves because of who they are is unique to them. It isn't.
I have not complained about speaking fees. The 140 mill that was a bribe
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
See, again, the facts don't support that wish. See Sessions' testimony yesterday.
I don't agree with your assessment of Session's comment. If he chooses to not prosecute, then justice will not be served. He has asked senior justice officials to evaluate. By the way, there's a big difference between $500,000 and 145,000,000. If you think the Clintons haven't been skirting the law, I have some ocean front property in Minnesota, right next door to a mosque, that I can sell you. My AP3's just came in today. Doubt if I'm going to get out of work early enough to get them.:cry:
 
I don't agree with your assessment of Session's comment. If he chooses to not prosecute, then justice will not be served. He has asked senior justice officials to evaluate. By the way, there's a big difference between $500,000 and 145,000,000. If you think the Clintons haven't been skirting the law, I have some ocean front property in Minnesota, right next door to a mosque, that I can sell you. My AP3's just came in today. Doubt if I'm going to get out of work early enough to get them.:cry:
Again, don't let the facts get in the way of a good hangin'. Did you listen to the summary from Shep? Have you read anything about the timing of the donations? There are so many facts that you wont accept. That is your problem. Meanwhile, the world moves on. Even Trump's puppet can see the facts don't support a special counsel much less any other investigation. Do you honestly thing Sessions would balk at an investigation if there were facts supporting the need for one?
 
Again, don't let the facts get in the way of a good hangin'. Did you listen to the summary from Shep? Have you read anything about the timing of the donations? There are so many facts that you wont accept. That is your problem. Meanwhile, the world moves on. Even Trump's puppet can see the facts don't support a special counsel much less any other investigation. Do you honestly thing Sessions would balk at an investigation if there were facts supporting the need for one?
Sessions is a globalist cuck
 
Sessions is a globalist cuck
Speaking of which, can you imagine if Obama had demanded investigations of his political opponents? Have we ever had a President (other than Nixon) who tried to use the DoJ to attack his political opponents? It's amazing the audacity. The country is becoming dumbed down to this new, incessant idiocy.
 
Speaking of which, can you imagine if Obama had demanded investigations of his political opponents? Have we ever had a President (other than Nixon) who tried to use the DoJ to attack his political opponents? It's amazing the audacity. The country is becoming dumbed down to this new, incessant idiocy.
IRS, DOJ to run guns into Mexico, without their knowledge and got a border guard killed, Attorney Gen held in contempt, Attorney Gen clandestinely meeting wtih HC's husband and all round horn dog?
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Again, don't let the facts get in the way of a good hangin'. Did you listen to the summary from Shep? Have you read anything about the timing of the donations? There are so many facts that you wont accept. That is your problem. Meanwhile, the world moves on. Even Trump's puppet can see the facts don't support a special counsel much less any other investigation. Do you honestly thing Sessions would balk at an investigation if there were facts supporting the need for one?

Shep Smith said All Lives matter was incendiary. His statement was an opinion and mine counts just as much as his.
 
Speaking of which, can you imagine if Obama had demanded investigations of his political opponents? Have we ever had a President (other than Nixon) who tried to use the DoJ to attack his political opponents? It's amazing the audacity. The country is becoming dumbed down to this new, incessant idiocy.
Have you been asleep.........IRS.....IRS....IRS.....“The IRS admits that its treatment of Plaintiffs during the tax-exempt determination process, including screening their applications based on their names or policy positions, subjecting those applications to heightened scrutiny and inordinate delays, and demanding some Plaintiffs’ information that TITA determined was unnecessary to the agency’s determination of their tax-exempt status, was wrong,” the IRS said in court documents. “For such treatment, the IRS expresses its sincere apology.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Shep Smith said All Lives matter was incendiary. His statement was an opinion and mine counts just as much as his.
He didn't give his opinion on the Hillary/uranium thing. He reported the facts. You people won't accept facts. If they run counter to your opinion, you claim they are fake news. There truly isn't any debating you people any more. It's kind of sad that we've hit this low as a country where facts no longer matter.
 
Have you been asleep.........IRS.....IRS....IRS.....“The IRS admits that its treatment of Plaintiffs during the tax-exempt determination process, including screening their applications based on their names or policy positions, subjecting those applications to heightened scrutiny and inordinate delays, and demanding some Plaintiffs’ information that TITA determined was unnecessary to the agency’s determination of their tax-exempt status, was wrong,” the IRS said in court documents. “For such treatment, the IRS expresses its sincere apology.”
Certainly a bad thing but I don't recall Obama calling from the rooftops (or twitter) to audit his political enemies. Trump is doing the analogous of that with his DoJ demands.
 
He didn't give his opinion on the Hillary/uranium thing. He reported the facts. You people won't accept facts. If they run counter to your opinion, you claim they are fake news. There truly isn't any debating you people any more. It's kind of sad that we've hit this low as a country where facts no longer matter.
You are just like the UNC fans when trying to defend UNC's fake classes. Those classes were approved by the collegiate accredidation assoc. Therefore, there's nothing wrong. NOBODY gives 140 mill to a foundation as crooked as the clinton's without getting quid pro quo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Certainly a bad thing but I don't recall Obama calling from the rooftops (or twitter) to audit his political enemies. Trump is doing the analogous of that with his DoJ demands.
He did scream, he quietly told them to. Obama is the consummate Marxist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Speaking of which, can you imagine if Obama had demanded investigations of his political opponents? Have we ever had a President (other than Nixon) who tried to use the DoJ to attack his political opponents? It's amazing the audacity. The country is becoming dumbed down to this new, incessant idiocy.
Actually, I can imagine it. It's kind of like the whole deal with the IRS, the DOJ funding of liberal activist organizations, illegal surveillance of AP reporters investigating you, and using BS dossiers to instigate a FISA surveillance on an opposition campaign. I guess it's a lot like that, wouldn't you agree?
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb and Airport
Actually, I can imagine it. It's kind of like the whole deal with the IRS, the DOJ funding of liberal activist organizations, illegally surveillance of AP reporters investigating you, and using BS dossiers to instigate a FISA surveillance on an opposition campaign. I guess it's a lot like that, wouldn't you agree?
It's what Marxism is all about.
 
Actually, I can imagine it. It's kind of like the whole deal with the IRS, the DOJ funding of liberal activist organizations, illegal surveillance of AP reporters investigating you, and using BS dossiers to instigate a FISA surveillance on an opposition campaign. I guess it's a lot like that, wouldn't you agree?
With all that, you'd think the GOP controlled Congress would've investigated. Oh wait. They did. Did the facts lead to any indictments or convictions? You people continue to throw all this shit on the wall hoping somethings sticks. Your Repubs who control Congress are either inept at investigating the Clintons and Obamas or they are all in on it too.
 
With all that, you'd think the GOP controlled Congress would've investigated. Oh wait. They did. Did the facts lead to any indictments or convictions? You people continue to throw all this shit on the wall hoping somethings sticks. Your Repubs who control Congress are either inept at investigating the Clintons and Obamas or they are all in on it too.
We now have a different attorney general. you do realize that congress can only make a referral and with crooked Lynch as the AG, nothing was ever going to happen except meet surrepticiously with the husband of a person who was susposed to be under investigation.
 
We now have a different attorney general. you do realize that congress can only make a referral and with crooked Lynch as the AG, nothing was ever going to happen except meet surrepticiously with the husband of a person who was susposed to be under investigation.
Trump was elected a year ago. You've controlled everything since january. What is the hold up. You'd think that if Obama and the Clintons were as guilty as you say, they'd be in jail by now.
 
With all that, you'd think the GOP controlled Congress would've investigated. Oh wait. They did. Did the facts lead to any indictments or convictions? You people continue to throw all this shit on the wall hoping somethings sticks. Your Repubs who control Congress are either inept at investigating the Clintons and Obamas or they are all in on it too.
You refute any of what I posted as fact?
 
Trump was elected a year ago. You've controlled everything since january. What is the hold up. You'd think that if Obama and the Clintons were as guilty as you say, they'd be in jail by now.

No Republicans don't control everything. It's Dems + 3 RINOS in the Senate.
 
Trump was elected a year ago. You've controlled everything since january. What is the hold up. You'd think that if Obama and the Clintons were as guilty as you say, they'd be in jail by now.
What is the holdup? The guy has been under a special prosecutor since week 1. You dumfuks wont shut the fuk up and let him govern.
 
There is a difference between overzealous underlings doing these things and the President calling for investigations of his political opponents. And again, who was indicted and or convicted?
You're showing you naivety again......and the Obama Justice Department announced in 2015 that no one at the IRS would be prosecuted. I know you are smarter than you are showing in regard to things like this....at least I thought you were.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT