I’ll admit it. I thought he was the reason and the cause. I feel like I owe that man an apology. It wasn’t him. We all now know who is to blame.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Plenty of Doege INT tipped off the finger and through a receivers hands for INT.We'd be worse with Doege. Rip on Daniels if you want, but he is clearly better than Doege. WVU had something resembling a pass defense back then.
And at least on of those JT INTs was a meaningless desperation throw at the end. And another hit a WR in the chest (late in the Pitt game).
I’ll admit it. I thought he was the reason and the cause. I feel like I owe that man an apology. It wasn’t him. We all now know who is to blame.
Daniels missed some passes today, but the receivers dropped some catchable passes as well.We'd be worse with Doege. Rip on Daniels if you want, but he is clearly better than Doege. WVU had something resembling a pass defense back then.
And at least on of those JT INTs was a meaningless desperation throw at the end. And another hit a WR in the chest (late in the Pitt game).
I am very surprised, even though I wasn't exactly expecting a Heisman finalist. The guy was a 5-star recruit, top-ranked QB in his class, and considering the USC and Georgia offers...yes I think we had a right to expect someone closer to the underlying physical ability of a top-notch passer. When I watch him at the moment it's really really hard to see how so many evaluators ever thought that he was even close to that type of playerI'm honestly less surprised by how much closer he is to Doege than I would be if he were close to Grier.
I suspect if Daniel's returns we will lose two capable QB'SI believe JT is better than Doege, however, what will be curious to see is how much of a mistake it was to bring him in. We have other capable guys on the roster who could have used the year to grow, and, who knows, maybe have a higher ceiling. We brought in Daniels not to be “better than Doege”, we brought him in, I thought, to compete for the conference. Possibly a big mistake, long term, in the qb room by doing so.
The argument needs to be made on THIS:We'd be worse with Doege. Rip on Daniels if you want, but he is clearly better than Doege. WVU had something resembling a pass defense back then.
And at least on of those JT INTs was a meaningless desperation throw at the end. And another hit a WR in the chest (late in the Pitt game).
I am very surprised, even though I wasn't exactly expecting a Heisman finalist. The guy was a 5-star recruit, top-ranked QB in his class, and considering the USC and Georgia offers...yes I think we had a right to expect someone closer to the underlying physical ability of a top-notch passer. When I watch him at the moment it's really really hard to see how so many evaluators ever thought that he was even close to that type of player
this guy is the reason for the transfer portal. Wasted his career under Neal Brown.The argument needs to be made on THIS:
Why isn't Greene getting a look? We are 3-6......would our record have been worse if he had been the starter from Game 1? He at least has the skill level that WVU QB's that have been successful has had.....the ability to scramble and not take sacks.
But they pan out at a higher rate than lower-end players. Usually you only get rated that highly when the physical gifts are obvious and overwhelming. Then if players of that inherent talent don't pan out, it's most often because 1) They can't stay healthy or 2) They are immature, uncoachable knuckleheads who never developed the work ethic due to coasting on physical ability at lower levels.I can understand the optimism, but multiple 5 star recruits do not pan out. Maybe he did get stuck in a situation like Jalen Hurts was at Alabama with Tua. However I highly doubted he was unluckily enough to be in that situation twice. I definitely thought he was going to better than Doege, but I was all but sure he would not be another Grier. Hence I'm not all that surprised he is more like Brad Lewis than the aforementioned Grier.
But they pan out at a higher rate than lower-end players. Usually you only get rated that highly when the physical gifts are obvious and overwhelming. Then if players of that inherent talent don't pan out, it's most often because 1) They can't stay healthy or 2) They are immature, uncoachable knuckleheads who never developed the work ethic due to coasting on physical ability at lower levels.
In the case of Daniels, there are not obvious and overwhelming physical tools which makes you wonder how so many people saw him as being in that class of player. However, the fact that two of those 5-star factory type schools moved on from him after injuries told me not to expect the world...but he still should've been better than this. It's a huge miss by multiple talent evaluators at places where they excel at that sort of thing.
Are you familiar with the 20-80 scouting scale they use in baseball, where 50 is average? I certainly wasn't expecting a Major Harris 80 at the very top, but I thought Daniels would at least be an above average 55-60. Instead, he's been closer to a below average 40-45.