If Houston's players jump around like fools on the sidelines after each score like they did tonight.....the AAC can keep the low-rent team.
I see a fit. There are mid pack and bottom feeders in every conference. I like this gamePretty entertaining game actually but there doesn't seem to be any interest here for two of the leading candidates playing each other.
I see a fit. There are mid pack and bottom feeders in every conference. I like this game
better than a Rutgers/ Indiana, Maryland/Northwestern, Wake Forest/Duke, Cuse/Wake,
Vandy/KY, Utah/Co, all power 5 potential matchups.
The more I think about it the more Houston makes sense. They can compete for titles if given the opportunity.
If you're Houston it is...Here's my question about this. Why does that make sense? The point of expansion is not so Houston can compete for titles.
If you're Houston it is...
Both schools will be upgrades to the Big12.
Cincinnati > Iowa State
Houston > Kansas
No facts can dispute that only opinions which are wrong
I am almost to the point that I am resigned to some combination of Cincy or Houston or BYU or UCONN. I can understand why one of the directional Florida schools would be seriously considered. But when Rice, and SMU and Temple and a bunch of other schools get serious consideration I lose hope that this conference is ever going to survive.
The point of expansion is not the benefit Houston. The point is to benefit the conference. Houston being able to compete for titles is not a benefit for the current 10 schools.
Here's my question about this. Why does that make sense? The point of expansion is not so Houston can compete for titles.
But if high quality top 20 program is a goal. You have that immediately with Houston.
One could argue that the perceived ability of Houston to compete for conference titles DOES benefit the other 10 schools in that the possibility of the Big 12 being absent from the playoffs is worse than having Houston be your representative as a conference champion.
So, because they're better teams at the current moment, they're better additions to the conference? I guess in 5 years we'll be adding Toledo, Marshall, Florida Atlantic and Appalachian State when they're better than our worst teams.Both schools will be upgrades to the Big12.
Cincinnati > Iowa State
Houston > Kansas
No facts can dispute that only opinions which are wrong
I guess in 5 years we'll be adding Toledo, Marshall, Florida Atlantic and Appalachian State when they're better than our worst teams.
I wonder if that's any different than adding Cinci, Houston, University of Phoenix and ITT Tech to the Big XII and we watch as Texas and OU bolt for other conferences and we go back to being in the the Second Fiddle ranks. Nope. Doesn't seem that way.No the Big 12-2=10 will still be debating adding two to get to 12 while we watch Houston (from an expanded SEC) play Cincinnati from an expanded ACC for the NC! Meanwhile Florida Atlantic and Appy State will be undefeated. Marshall will be at the top of the newly adjusted AAC. The good thing is DH will be on the last year of yet another contract extension and coming off his fifth straight 7-6 finish. If he could only have another decade to get his program in place.
So, because they're better teams at the current moment, they're better additions to the conference? I guess in 5 years we'll be adding Toledo, Marshall, Florida Atlantic and Appalachian State when they're better than our worst teams.
Second Fiddle ranks
If the SEC would come in and take Houston, this would give them an even larger footprint into Texas and that would hurt the Big 12 considerably. Houston is a must.