“How about George Washington high school? ‘We want the name removed from that high school.’ They don’t know why. You know, they thought he had slaves. Actually I think he probably didn’t.’”
Ok. Just as bad is that statement though.That entire renaming everything was the epitome of stupid.
The amount of money each school spent to rename was crazy. It is way more involved than simply slapping a few new words on the marquee out front. The schools could have used that money for far better and more useful purposes.
That entire renaming everything was the epitome of stupid.
The amount of money each school spent to rename was crazy. It is way more involved than simply slapping a few new words on the marquee out front. The schools could have used that money for far better and more useful purposes.
It is all stupid. You cannot erase history, but Democrats love to try. The fact the majority of Americans believe the civil war was entirely about slavery shows they have almost mastered it.Ok. Just as bad is that statement though.
Really? Democrats love to try? And him saying he doesn’t believe GW owned slaves isn’t “rewriting history”? Or is it just plain retarded?It is all stupid. You cannot erase history, but Democrats love to try. The fact the majority of Americans believe the civil war was entirely about slavery shows they have almost mastered it.
Yes, Democrats love to try. Remember who started the KKK? It wasn’t Republicans, but they have people believing the right wing is racist.Really? Democrats love to try? And him saying he doesn’t believe GW owned slaves isn’t “rewriting history”? Or is it just plain retarded?
Deflecting again. And his statement isn’t “revisionist history”, which is not only retarded but also attempting to “rewrite” history?Yes, Democrats love to try. Remember who started the KKK? It wasn’t Republicans, but they have people believing the right wing is racist.
I’m not deflecting anything. I’m telling you the facts.Deflecting again. And his statement isn’t “revisionist history”, which is not only retarded but also attempting to “rewrite” history?
And do you remember why democrats like Storm Thurmond left the party? Civil rights. And which party did he join because of people like Nixon and his Southern Strategy?
And since you are a “facts” person, what say you about his statement on Washington not owning slaves?I’m not deflecting anything. I’m telling you the facts.
You are right. Having a potential leader of the free world making statements like “I don’t think Washington owned slaves” is ok.I can't imagine giving a shit about this after the last 4 years of this Administration.
George Washington became a slave owner at the early age of eleven, when his father died and left him the 280 acre farm near Fredericksburg, Virginia where the family was then living. In addition, Washington was willed ten slaves.“How about George Washington high school? ‘We want the name removed from that high school.’ They don’t know why. You know, they thought he had slaves. Actually I think he probably didn’t.’”
Good for her. Who gives a shit?That was very nice of him to free his slaves when he died........unless you look in to a bit deeper and see that he had them freed upon "Martha's death".......she ended up freeing them in 1801.
That was very nice of him to free his slaves when he died........unless you look in to a bit deeper and see that he had them freed upon "Martha's death".......she ended up freeing them in 1801.
I don’t care about the topic enough to say if he did or didn’t. It’s totally irrelevant to the current times. Typical libtard divisiveness, it doesn’t matter what happened 200 years ago. Nobody alive today benefitted from it or suffered from it. Do you run your mouth to modern day Italians for the Romans killing Jesus? What nationality was Goliath? Was it a hate crime from David? As you laugh at this utter stupidity, you would be right. It’s stupid.And since you are a “facts” person, what say you about his statement on Washington not owning slaves?
Umm...it was TRUMP who brought up the subject in the first place. NOT ME. I get it.....you cannot say a bad word towards your messiah. If Biden had made the statement about Washington not owning slaves, you'd be all over it. FACT.I don’t care about the topic enough to say if he did or didn’t. It’s totally irrelevant to the current times. Typical libtard divisiveness, it doesn’t matter what happened 200 years ago. Nobody alive today benefitted from it or suffered from it. Do you run your mouth to modern day Italians for the Romans killing Jesus? What nationality was Goliath? Was it a hate crime from David? As you laugh at this utter stupidity, you would be right. It’s stupid.
Since he didn’t technically own the enslaved people Martha had inherited, he didn’t say they should be freed. Instead, he used them to justify the continued enslavement of the others.
By the time George died, he owned 123 enslaved people outright. After Washington’s death, Martha freed just one person: William Lee, a Revolutionary War celebrity who was the only enslaved person George said should be immediately given his freedom. But she didn’t free the others—until she became convinced that they were plotting against her.
George’s enslaved workers wasn’t as complicated as the president implied in his will. In January 1801, they left Mount Vernon as free men and women.
The 153 enslaved people who Martha had inherited weren’t so lucky. They were divvied up between her children when she died in 1802. None of Martha’s children freed more than a few of the enslaved workers or their children during their lifetimes. And Martha never freed the single enslaved man she owned outright, even willing him to her grandson. George’s views on slavery may have been advanced, but his family apparently did not share them.
Good for her. Who gives a shit?
Actually, no I wouldn’t be. Do you see me sharing articles or stupid quotes from Biden on anything? No, you don’t. FACT is, you’re lying. FACT.Umm...it was TRUMP who brought up the subject in the first place. NOT ME. I get it.....you cannot say a bad word towards your messiah. If Biden had made the statement about Washington not owning slaves, you'd be all over it. FACT.
Oh, we’re back to this guy. While Rome burns, we’re gonna have to entertain your little stupid gotchas on issues of zero significance.“How about George Washington high school? ‘We want the name removed from that high school.’ They don’t know why. You know, they thought he had slaves. Actually I think he probably didn’t.’”
But you sure do respond to someone else when they post them day after day. It's ok actually. I get it.Actually, no I wouldn’t be. Do you see me sharing articles or stupid quotes from Biden on anything? No, you don’t. FACT is, you’re lying. FACT.
Ignore if you like. Nobody twisted your arm to hit "reply". They like to talk about mental decline.......well........Oh, we’re back to this guy. While Rome burns, we’re gonna have to entertain your little stupid gotchas on issues of zero significance.
It matter to special people who sit down to pee.You are right. Having a potential leader of the free world making statements like “I don’t think Washington owned slaves” is ok.
Biden think George Washington was the guy who owned the dry cleaners in a tv sitcomIgnore if you like. Nobody twisted your arm to hit "reply". They like to talk about mental decline.......well........
More false assumptions lol. Makes sense. You’re a liberal who relies on emotions.But you sure do respond to someone else when they post them day after day. It's ok actually. I get it.
Did Noah bother to ask what gender the animals identified as before selection?Ignore if you like. Nobody twisted your arm to hit "reply". They like to talk about mental decline.......well........
You are right. Having a potential leader of the free world making statements like “I don’t think Washington owned slaves” is ok.
Exactly. Owning slaves was legal. Most owners treated their folks well. Many didn't and that says a lot about the who did mistreated humans.Don't care enough to verify if he said or not, nor do I care to hold George Washington to a standard of today when he lived in the 1700's.
What I care about is getting Biden and the New Democrat Party out of office before they destroy what's left of our Country. Because that's what's important RIGHT NOW.
Exactly. Owning slaves was legal. Most owners treated their folks well. Many didn't and that says a lot about the who did mistreated humans.
We moved on.
The predecessor of the so called "Southern strategy" was LBJ's "great society"Deflecting again. And his statement isn’t “revisionist history”, which is not only retarded but also attempting to “rewrite” history?
And do you remember why democrats like Strom Thurmond left the party? Civil rights. And which party did he join because of people like Nixon and his Southern Strategy?
Democrats were the authors of poll tests, segregation, and Jim Crow. They fought to both maintain that way of Life in the South and in fact continued it even after the Civil War.And to your civil war claim, it was about the disagreement if the federal government could pass laws on the states. What law? Slavery. .
We basically still practice slavery but that is a different debate. I agree with you about slavery then vs now for sure. Slavery is still an issue in most of the world.Slavery is bad. If George Washington was alive today I'm sure he would agree. Since we are alive today I like to focus on how the New Democrat Party and Biden screw up everything it touches. At this point everyone should assume it's on purpose.
Leftists don't want to talk about how their failed policies have "enslaved" millions of blacks who've blindly voted for them for the past 50 years. Think of that? 50 years of false promises, failed ideas, and poor results. Blacks who live in Democrat dominated cities are poorer, less safe, likely unemployed, undereducated, unskilled and as racist as their Democrat White slave Masters who insist it's Republicans and Conservatives holding them back from "emancipation".We basically still practice slavery but that is a different debate. I agree with you about slavery then vs now for sure. Slavery is still an issue in most of the world.
We basically still practice slavery but that is a different debate. I agree with you about slavery then vs now for sure. Slavery is still an issue in most of the world.
The statement, whoever said it, is what it is.Ok. Just as bad is that statement though.
Which ones are looking at changing their name?George Washington became a slave owner at the early age of eleven, when his father died and left him the 280 acre farm near Fredericksburg, Virginia where the family was then living. In addition, Washington was willed ten slaves.
10 Facts About Washington & Slavery
www.mountvernon.org
I don't give a damn about George Washington high school and what they want to call it. You liberals will not be happy until you change the history of this country. Joe Biden destroying America in 4 short years.
George Washington High School may refer to a number of high schools including:
- George Washington Preparatory High School, Los Angeles, California
- Washington High School (Cedar Rapids, Iowa) in Cedar Rapids, Iowa
- George Washington High School (San Francisco) in San Francisco, California
- George Washington High School (Colorado) in Denver, Colorado
- George Washington High School (Delray Beach) in Delray Beach, Florida
- George Washington High School (Guam) in Mangilao, Guam
- George Washington High School (Chicago) in Chicago, Illinois
- George Washington Community High School in Indianapolis, Indiana
- George Washington High School (New York City) in New York City, New York
- George Washington High School (Philadelphia) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- George Washington High School (Danville, Virginia) in Danville, Virginia
- George Washington High School (Charleston, West Virginia) in Charleston, West Virginia
Ok, so it goes back several years. That makes sense. I follow the news pretty closely and hadn’t heard anything about this.San Francisco to remove names of Washington and Lincoln from schools
School board voted to give 44 schools new names with no connection to slavery, oppression or racismwww.google.com
San Francisco to remove names of Washington and Lincoln from schools
This article is more than 3 years old
School board voted to give 44 schools new names with no connection to slavery, oppression or racism