He also doesnt question the veracity of the transcripts except for 2 minor points that dont affect the case.
Eric Ciamarella - WB #1
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
Not a whistleblower. Sorry. He will get a chance to face everyone who has given depostions...if he doesn't chicken out.
Policy opinion? WTF are you smoking? LMAO! The whistleblower reported a potential violation of law and has whistleblower protection under the law. The president went on to confess to the crime on national television.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Yes they do. A whistleblower still has to testify in court and not in secret.
He couldnt report a crine because he didnt hear the call you ignorant fukweed.
I doubt the whistleblower will testify because he didnt witness anything to testify about. He may testify in his own defense though.
To suggest that a whistleblower is protected from being a witness though is comedy.
Not that comical. More like everyone in the room with a brain silently making eye contact as to not openly mock you until you left the room comedy.
Doesn’t being a whistleblower merely protect from reprisal? Granted, I’m not positive, but there isn’t a guarantee of anonymity nor for formal testimony?
Yes. They cannot be fired for blowing the whistle. They can be offered security.
They are required to testify if called by the defense or prosecution. They are also responsible for any crime they committed within the context of the crime they reported and obviously any other crime they are accused of.
Your stupidity is amazing that you think a whistleblower will be named. No wonder you fall for all of the conspiracy theories.
Probably shouldnt call people stupid when you are busy missing the point completely.
Funniest part is he wants so badly to be considered intelligent but he knows it is not an attainable goal.
Seemingly the only language Ciaramella doesn't speak is truth...
Similar threads
