ADVERTISEMENT

Documents show Gee met with Houston and others

Buckaineer

All-Conference
Sep 3, 2001
7,294
652
333
As a member of the BIG 12 expansion committee Gee had lots of interaction with schools seeking membership and visited the University of Houston:

excerpt:
Documents show Big 12 flirting with Houston, Memphis, others
With Big 12 expansion back on the table, officials from the University of Houston, the University of Memphis, University of Central Florida and Colorado State University have been lobbying members of the Big 12's composition committee, according to documents ESPN.com has obtained.

West Virginia president Gordon Gee is one of three Big 12 presidents on the committee, which is charged with exploring expansion candidates. Documents reveal that Gee has been busy in that role in recent months, which has included a trip to the University of Houston in late November.


http://espn.go.com/college-football...-houston-memphis-ucf-colorado-state-expansion
 
excerpt from FOX sports:
Could new developments have Memphis, Houston atop Big 12 expansion list?
On the surface, Cincinnati and UCF — both in major media markets — appeared to be the front runners for the 11th and 12th spots respectively. But according to an ESPN report on Tuesday, both Houston and Memphis have made strong pushes in recent months to try and get to the top of the list.



Memphis, specifically, seems to be willing to do whatever it takes to get into the conference — including the unusual step of guaranteeing that local company FedEx will sponsor the new Big 12 title game. Via ESPN:



On Feb. 24, Memphis president David Rudd penned a letter to (West Virginia president Gordon) Gee and copied Oklahoma president David Boren and Baylor president Ken Starr, the other two members of the composition committee, as well as former Big 12 board chairman and Kansas State president Kirk Schulz. In the letter, Rudd pledged that Memphis will make a $500 million investment in academic and athletic infrastructure over the next five years. Rudd also enclosed a letter from FedEx chairman Fred Smith, who stated that the delivery services giant headquartered in Memphis will be behind the school's Big 12 campaign.
 
As a member of the BIG 12 expansion committee Gee had lots of interaction with schools seeking membership and visited the University of Houston:

excerpt:
Documents show Big 12 flirting with Houston, Memphis, others
With Big 12 expansion back on the table, officials from the University of Houston, the University of Memphis, University of Central Florida and Colorado State University have been lobbying members of the Big 12's composition committee, according to documents ESPN.com has obtained.

West Virginia president Gordon Gee is one of three Big 12 presidents on the committee, which is charged with exploring expansion candidates. Documents reveal that Gee has been busy in that role in recent months, which has included a trip to the University of Houston in late November.


http://espn.go.com/college-football...-houston-memphis-ucf-colorado-state-expansion
its a pretty easy decision that is being dragged out. First and foremost; you add BYU. The last choice is between Houston and Colorado State. The rest is garbage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lenny4wvu
Memphis is pledging to sponsor the BIG 12 championship game. Can't imagine why CSU would be better than that.

Cincinnati and UConn and UCF are also very good choices.

BYU may simply have too many requirements to change the minds of people that have already dealt with them. Considering the already bumpy relationships in the conference and their lack of willingness to negotiate things, that could be a downfall for BYU.

Houston is in a market the BIG 12 already exists in and they need new markets and new recruiting areas, not just the same ones they already have.

But we'll see if they decide to expand and if so who they feel would be best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LowFatMilk
Memphis is pledging to sponsor the BIG 12 championship game. Can't imagine why CSU would be better than that.

Cincinnati and UConn and UCF are also very good choices.

BYU may simply have too many requirements to change the minds of people that have already dealt with them. Considering the already bumpy relationships in the conference and their lack of willingness to negotiate things, that could be a downfall for BYU.

Houston is in a market the BIG 12 already exists in and they need new markets and new recruiting areas, not just the same ones they already have.

But we'll see if they decide to expand and if so who they feel would be best.
the FedEx big 12 championship game is the only thing besides basketball that Memphis has IMO. I still pick byu, Colorado state/Houston. They are a better fit.
 
The choices seem most obvious to the people who aren't at the table. If it was obvious it would have already been done. Like Lyons said, it is 90 to 180 days away. Might have to arrange to chew on someone else's fingernails for a while. I like their process, deliberate and methodical and from Lyons comments, everything is on the table to be talked about.
 
The choices seem most obvious to the people who aren't at the table. If it was obvious it would have already been done. Like Lyons said, it is 90 to 180 days away. Might have to arrange to chew on someone else's fingernails for a while. I like their process, deliberate and methodical and from Lyons comments, everything is on the table to be talked about.
and the likely end result will have a dark horse choice nobody is mentioning like SMU or something similar. Either way, it's nice to know we are already a member instead of years past wondering if we will escape the big east to be picked up by a P5 conference. It's nice to be on the other side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lenny4wvu
Its important they get the data and review it, but 90 to 180 days from May is going to set themselves up for lots of negative press, and leaks and other things that could be damaging to the process--much like the outburst from OU's BOR Chair yesterday.

When the Big Ten was adding Maryland, they kept things quiet right up until they were getting close. When the news started leaking, they didn't let all the negativity and speculation fester, they instead moved quickly with UMD and Rutgers. They were in the conference (or joining) before everyone could send out the attack dogs and criticize.

The BIG 12 is already under fire from all fronts and delaying longer than necessary is just going to hurt. If they are going to do it they really need to get on with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lenny4wvu
the FedEx big 12 championship game is the only thing besides basketball that Memphis has IMO. I still pick byu, Colorado state/Houston. They are a better fit.

Memphis also has excellent basketball and a stadium that can hold 60,000 people (they filled it for Ole Miss last year). They have a nice bowl game there as well as a nice city for tourists. They also fit in the geographic footprint.

Can't think of any superb sports at CSU, they are off in another direction, have no recruiting base? Not sure what makes them a strong candidate compared to many of the others. If they went to four and also add BYU maybe.

We shall see what they decide, if they decide.
 
Memphis also has excellent basketball and a stadium that can hold 60,000 people (they filled it for Ole Miss last year). They have a nice bowl game there as well as a nice city for tourists. They also fit in the geographic footprint.

Can't think of any superb sports at CSU, they are off in another direction, have no recruiting base? Not sure what makes them a strong candidate compared to many of the others. If they went to four and also add BYU maybe.

We shall see what they decide, if they decide.
thats what I said above; they have basketball. Not much else. The big 12 already has the liberty bowl tie in without Memphis. No gain there. Colorado state fills the void from Colorado leaving. They fit in the footprint better than Memphis IMO. However, if that's the criteria, I guess we should be booted lol. It's really just my opinion as you have yours.
 
thats what I said above; they have basketball. Not much else. The big 12 already has the liberty bowl tie in without Memphis. No gain there. Colorado state fills the void from Colorado leaving. They fit in the footprint better than Memphis IMO. However, if that's the criteria, I guess we should be booted lol. It's really just my opinion as you have yours.

If the conference gets down to deciding on expansion they could pick any of the candidates.
 
excerpt from FOX sports:
...Memphis, specifically, seems to be willing to do whatever it takes to get into the conference — including the unusual step of guaranteeing that local company FedEx will sponsor the new Big 12 title game.

Not unusual at all. Memphis has been playing this song ever since Miami left the Big East - "promising the Liberty Bowl" if they could get into the Big East. When you have to promise a bowl game to pad your resume, your resume is pretty weak. The Big12 does not lack for venues for the CCG and there is probably none better suited than the Cowboy Stadium in Arlington Texas. The rest look meh compared to that facility. Additionally, I would much rather spend some vacation time in the Dallas/Ft Worth metropolis than dodging bullets in Memphis.
 
Its important they get the data and review it, but 90 to 180 days from May is going to set themselves up for lots of negative press, and leaks and other things that could be damaging to the process--much like the outburst from OU's BOR Chair yesterday.

When the Big Ten was adding Maryland, they kept things quiet right up until they were getting close. When the news started leaking, they didn't let all the negativity and speculation fester, they instead moved quickly with UMD and Rutgers. They were in the conference (or joining) before everyone could send out the attack dogs and criticize.

The BIG 12 is already under fire from all fronts and delaying longer than necessary is just going to hurt. If they are going to do it they really need to get on with it.

Really? Who is shooting at them? "Under Fire?"

The process takes as long as it takes and there is no one that can say anything about it except those making the decision and I want them to take all the time they need. There is only one cycle that matters and that is the college cycle from July 1 through June 30. After that, it is all gravy.

As we have 7 weeks to go on this matter to meet this years deadline, I would not worry about it much. If the process needs more time than that, we have all of next year as well. Plenty of time and those upset about the timetable should go find a new hobby.
 
Last edited:
Its important they get the data and review it, but 90 to 180 days from May is going to set themselves up for lots of negative press, and leaks and other things that could be damaging to the process--much like the outburst from OU's BOR Chair yesterday.

When the Big Ten was adding Maryland, they kept things quiet right up until they were getting close. When the news started leaking, they didn't let all the negativity and speculation fester, they instead moved quickly with UMD and Rutgers. They were in the conference (or joining) before everyone could send out the attack dogs and criticize.

The BIG 12 is already under fire from all fronts and delaying longer than necessary is just going to hurt. If they are going to do it they really need to get on with it.

Don't buy in to a poker player's words or facial expressions. Lyons saying 3 - 6 months for a decision is likely a ruse. An announcement either way regarding any schools could come as early as the end of the presidents' meeting. Or it may not. What would you say if you were Lyons being pressured for any tidbit or crumb of new information? The most polite way of saying "Get off my ass about it." is to say "I know nothing and it could be awhile."
 
its a pretty easy decision that is being dragged out. First and foremost; you add BYU. The last choice is between Houston and Colorado State. The rest is garbage.
BYU with their no Sunday restriction has basically taken themselves out of the competition with their requirements. They were hard to get along with while they were in the WAC and MWC. It is like taking Notre Dame with 1/4 the fanbase and 1/8th the national respect.
 
I still think back to the A D and coaches' meetings when CBS' Dodd was convinced from his interviews that the two primary targets were Cincinnati and UCF. I may not totally agree with it, but I haven't seen the studies or interviewed the people conducting them. They both bring a huge number of potential viewers outside the current Big 12 broadcast footprint.

Several schools are pushing hard and you have to give Memphis a second look with a five year $500 million commitment to athletic and academic improvements as well as the promised financial backing of Fed Ex. An up front offer of a Fed Ex Big 12 CCG? Dayumm!
 
Really? Who is shooting at them? "Under Fire?"

The process takes as long as it takes and there is no one that can say anything about it except those making the decision and I want them to take all the time they need. There is only one cycle that matters and that is the college cycle from July 1 through June 30. After that, it is all gravy.

As we have 7 weeks to go on this matter to meet this years deadline, I would not worry about it much. If the process needs more time than that, we have all of next year as well. Plenty of time and those upset about the timetable should go find a new hobby.

At every level of social media people are trying to pick the conference apart

Regional media outlets have joined the chorus from putting down the possible schools to ridiculing the leadership of the conference

National media such as CBS have begun regular hit pieces on the BIG 12--the latest from CBS trumpeting discord at OU and blowing up anything negative that happens while ignoring or dismissing the positives completely.

Media are ridiculing the data they are compiling before they've even compiled it, proclaiming no one is worthy, making up all sorts of wild scenarios the BIG 12 should do before expanding (i.e. expand the playoffs instead as if the BIG 12 controls that). And its all bad press based on emotional outbursts, dislike of the conference, coveting of BIG 12 schools and disregards factual information about the schools in question and the process.

We hear about "anonymous sources" supposedly saying this or that disparaging the conference improving itself, and its taken as valid evidence-- while factual scientific studies of the likelihood of making the playoffs is dismissed off hand because they don't understand it.

Look online and there are 20 to 50 severely negative articles towards the BIG 12 and schools in it. Slamming leaders and schools in the conference and any move they attempt to make. WVU has been bashed in many of these articles and discussions .

None of these people worked against any other conferences growth and future plans, but suddenly everyone but the leaders of the BIG 12 are experts at proclaiming the BIG 12 doomed--largely because they want BIG 12 schools to move somewhere else. People are actually publishing articles about that--that the conference should do nothing but sit back so a few can move to other conferences while the rest are dropped down. The negativity is completely out of control and only the BIG 12 can stop it. By making some decisions.

Now every detail of meetings with the schools is coming out as the press can get them--exposing everyone to possible release of information that other conferences have kept private. Exposing their potential future members to public ridicule and scorn.

Investigation is fine, but an endless amount of time is NOT needed. There's nothing more pressing than the issues at hand. They should be having special meetings at this point and getting through it, not waiting months and months and months which just fosters the idea that they are inept--and that is what is being projected (and written and talked about). Make a decision and stick with it. It doesn't take 180 days to determine the financial viability of candidates or to read their resumes or determine which fit the profile best, or if the league is going to admit any of these new programs at all or abandon any and all improvements.

In the meantime the conference is getting trashed and weakened and their solutions, leaders and the conference are being bashed. If they had gotten to it and made their decisions they would instead be moving forward with them and the negativity would not have grown to this point or as large as its going to get in another several months. They are making the decisions harder than necessary and weakening their negotiating power should they choose to make improvements for the future.
 
Last edited:
Don't buy in to a poker player's words or facial expressions. Lyons saying 3 - 6 months for a decision is likely a ruse. An announcement either way regarding any schools could come as early as the end of the presidents' meeting. Or it may not. What would you say if you were Lyons being pressured for any tidbit or crumb of new information? The most polite way of saying "Get off my ass about it." is to say "I know nothing and it could be awhile."

He isn't the only one that's stated as much. So has Bowlsby. Boren tried to push them --being the first to suggest they need to be done one way or the other this summer. They are getting trashed in the media with their inability to act--either way. Make a decision. Its weakening the conference and its position. Once the details are coming out publicly and national media are beginning to do hit pieces its time to move--whichever way they decide to go.
 
The press loves negative stories. Nothing new. Lead off stories are always murders. Negative press sure hasn't hurt Donald Trump.
The process will take as long as it takes. Only the BIG12 and it's members can tear apart the BIG12. Buy some worry beads.
 
As a member of the BIG 12 expansion committee Gee had lots of interaction with schools seeking membership and visited the University of Houston:

excerpt:
Documents show Big 12 flirting with Houston, Memphis, others
With Big 12 expansion back on the table, officials from the University of Houston, the University of Memphis, University of Central Florida and Colorado State University have been lobbying members of the Big 12's composition committee, according to documents ESPN.com has obtained.

West Virginia president Gordon Gee is one of three Big 12 presidents on the committee, which is charged with exploring expansion candidates. Documents reveal that Gee has been busy in that role in recent months, which has included a trip to the University of Houston in late November.


http://espn.go.com/college-football...-houston-memphis-ucf-colorado-state-expansion

First I have to say No list is relevant if BIG12 can't get TexA$$ on board with LHN which looks to still be an uphill battle
I don't get the thought of adding Houston. With four programs already covering the entire state of Texas, the BIG12 needs to expand into new areas.
I understand the firtation with Memphis since FedEx has always been behind that school.
I still think Cincy and UCF would be the best choices, but I doubt that will ever happen.
 
Hmmm, a very brief survey of Google found these--seems some have their heads buried in the sand.
It doesn't matter if its the Washington post or SB Nation--the headlines are out there, the stories are out there. If you read them, listen to them, view them--they are all out there--but wouldn't be if the BIG 12 could get itself together and act. None of this below (and there is lots more where that came from) is benefitting anyone.

The Big 12 is a mess, but expansion probably isn’t the answer

Washington Post · 1 day ago

Forget adding 2 or 14 teams. The Big 12 should add 86 teams.
SB Nation - ‎May 10, 2016‎

There's infighting at Oklahoma over potential Big 12 expansion
Highly Cited-CBSSports.com-May 9, 2016

Expansion may not strengthen Big 12
Greenville News-22 hours ago


Forget adding 2 teams. The Big 12 should add 14.
SB Nation-May 9, 2016

Big 12 Expansion - The Beginning Of The End?
Highly Cited-news9.com KWTV-May 9, 2016

Podcast: Is Texas controlling the Big 12's expansion plans?
FOXSports.com-May 9, 2016


The Big 12 Is Already Dead, Kill The Expansion Chatter
The Big Lead-May 6, 2016



Not all OU trustees apparently sold on Big 12 expansion
mySanAntonio.com-May 9, 2016



Report: Texas pressure is holding up Big 12 expansion
Burnt Orange Nation-May 4, 2016


Big 12 shouldn't expand until the league gets its story straight
Sporting News-May 6, 2016

Big 12 should push to expand the playoff, not its conference
Yahoo Sports-May 4, 2016

College football analysts: Texas, Oklahoma have eyes on 'greener ...
Dallas Morning News-16 hours ago


Oklahoma was 'within 30 minutes' of leaving for the Pac-10 in 2010

CBS Sports · 1 day ago

Oklahoma regents chairman opposes Big 12 expansion

ESPN · 1 day ago

Oklahoma president, board chair on different sides of Big 12 expansion issue

Sporting News · 41 minutes ago
 
I've seen most of those and half are reposts of the same CBS article. You see negative press where others don't. Many are just speculative and most simply are questioning the facts. I don't see most of these these as negative at all. You are mostly bothered that they haven't uniformly embraced the evangelism of expansion. I like seeing ALL the points of view myself. You worry too much. Thanks for posting these, they make some great points.
 
Its a mocking of the conference. If the conference had expanded, or decided not to--that article doesn't exist ridiculing the conference.
No, it is the author raising his hand and introducing himself as clueless.
 
I've seen most of those and half are reposts of the same CBS article. You see negative press where others don't. Many are just speculative and most simply are questioning the facts. I don't see most of these these as negative at all. You are mostly bothered that they haven't uniformly embraced the evangelism of expansion. I like seeing ALL the points of view myself. You worry too much. Thanks for posting these, they make some great points.

No half are not just reposts--but reposts aren't good either. Can't think of any other conference having such vitriol spewed towards it. Of course these articles are speculative. Can't imagine how anyone could see these and not see them as negative, or more importantly damaging. People projecting opinions that the BIG 12 can't do this or that when everyone else can, schools aren't worthy, the conference should just break up and on and on and you don't see that as negative? WoW.
 
No half are not just reposts--but reposts aren't good either. Can't think of any other conference having such vitriol spewed towards it. Of course these articles are speculative. Can't imagine how anyone could see these and not see them as negative, or more importantly damaging. People projecting opinions that the BIG 12 can't do this or that when everyone else can, schools aren't worthy, the conference should just break up and on and on and you don't see that as negative? WoW.

Sorry, you are just way to sensitive. The Big 12 is not getting trashed. Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they are trashing you. The articles you linked are making a legitimate point. It's very questionable if schools like Cincinnati or Central Florida are going to strengthen the Big 12 financially or otherwise. These are schools that don't have big fan bases or national appeal, and were not valued enough to be picked up by any of the other P5 conferences. It is certainly reasonable to question how viable those expansion scenarios actually are. It's also perfectly reasonable to report on some Big 12 officials or schools who question the wisdom or value of adding these teams. That's simply not trashing. You just want everything said about the Big 12 to be 100% positive, and you don't want see anything that calls into question the probability of conference expansion, which for some reason you see as some sort of Holy Grail. In short, you just want to have your own opinion reinforced and echoed.
 
Sorry, you are just way to sensitive. The Big 12 is not getting trashed. Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they are trashing you. The articles you linked are making a legitimate point. It's very questionable if schools like Cincinnati or Central Florida are going to strengthen the Big 12 financially or otherwise. These are schools that don't have big fan bases or national appeal, and were not valued enough to be picked up by any of the other P5 conferences. It is certainly reasonable to question how viable those expansion scenarios actually are. It's also perfectly reasonable to report on some Big 12 officials or schools who question the wisdom or value of adding these teams. That's simply not trashing. You just want everything said about the Big 12 to be 100% positive, and you don't want see anything that calls into question the probability of conference expansion, which for some reason you see as some sort of Holy Grail. In short, you just want to have your own opinion reinforced and echoed.

B.S. What other conference has had such vitriol and hate spewed when they discussed making positive changes?
NONE. These people are yammering on and on claiming things about the BIG 12 that are based on emotions or worse-intentional negativity to downrate the conference. This is EXACTLY what OUs president Boren spoke of when he stated the conference has a "psychological disadvantage"---others are trying to project that the BIG 12 is substandard and in trouble, while they ignore that other conferences have bigger financial and competitive issues than the BIG 12 ever has. When there are dozens of negative articles day after day proclaiming the ACC shouldn't consider a network and shouldn't have added or considered this or that team come back and well discuss. Otherwise go back to your boards with your nonsense-it has no place here.
 
B.S. What other conference has had such vitriol and hate spewed when they discussed making positive changes?
NONE. These people are yammering on and on claiming things about the BIG 12 that are based on emotions or worse-intentional negativity to downrate the conference. This is EXACTLY what OUs president Boren spoke of when he stated the conference has a "psychological disadvantage"---others are trying to project that the BIG 12 is substandard and in trouble, while they ignore that other conferences have bigger financial and competitive issues than the BIG 12 ever has. When there are dozens of negative articles day after day proclaiming the ACC shouldn't consider a network and shouldn't have added or considered this or that team come back and well discuss. Otherwise go back to your boards with your nonsense-it has no place here.

No, it's not B.S. These articles simply are not bashing the Big 12. Your definition of bashing is simply wrong. You are also wrong about the ACC. The ACC has have plenty of critical articles written about it. They have been criticized for selling the Tier 3 rights to ESPN, syndicating with Raycom, etc.

By the way, you are the one yammering on about the Big 12 based on emotion. Anybody looking at this logically knows that Cincinnati and Memphis are not long-term answers to any conference's problems.
 
No half are not just reposts--but reposts aren't good either. Can't think of any other conference having such vitriol spewed towards it. Of course these articles are speculative. Can't imagine how anyone could see these and not see them as negative, or more importantly damaging. People projecting opinions that the BIG 12 can't do this or that when everyone else can, schools aren't worthy, the conference should just break up and on and on and you don't see that as negative? WoW.
I just read them for what they are. Since I am only awaiting their decision and not trying to influence it I am more objective. Some make silly points, some make good points. I have no doubt that there are people trying to influence the outcome for whatever reason. You are one of them. I just read it all as the most interesting competition and subject in college football during the summer of 2016. No more, No less.
 
The people writing those articles are trying to influence opinion and it is influencing opinion.

Just as OUs president said-they've got to eliminate the "psychological disadvantage".

Anyone pretending articles on line for everyone to see when they search the conference such as:
The Big 12 Is Already Dead, Kill The Expansion Chatter
are not negative to the conference or damaging is really just not being honest about the situation anyway.

Trying to personally attack other posters that bring it up won't change that unfortunately.

Dragging out the decision making process has no benefit, just more of the cr@p as above.

Make a decision and get on with it--best for everyone involved.
 
The people writing those articles are trying to influence opinion and it is influencing opinion.

Just as OUs president said-they've got to eliminate the "psychological disadvantage".

Anyone pretending articles on line for everyone to see when they search the conference such as:
The Big 12 Is Already Dead, Kill The Expansion Chatter
are not negative to the conference or damaging is really just not being honest about the situation anyway.

Trying to personally attack other posters that bring it up won't change that unfortunately.

Dragging out the decision making process has no benefit, just more of the cr@p as above.

Make a decision and get on with it--best for everyone involved.
Actualy, for as inflammatory as the title was, the article actually wasn't that negative. I thought they made some good points.
 
No half are not just reposts--but reposts aren't good either. Can't think of any other conference having such vitriol spewed towards it. Of course these articles are speculative. Can't imagine how anyone could see these and not see them as negative, or more importantly damaging. People projecting opinions that the BIG 12 can't do this or that when everyone else can, schools aren't worthy, the conference should just break up and on and on and you don't see that as negative? WoW.
You have to admit the conference deserves what it gets. The BIG12 is as strong or stronger than any conference if you combine BB and FB, yet several programs insist on it is all about them and not the conference. If there were unity in the conference like all other conferences, it would be and remain in the top 3 P5 programs competitively and financially
 
You have to admit the conference deserves what it gets. The BIG12 is as strong or stronger than any conference if you combine BB and FB, yet several programs insist on it is all about them and not the conference. If there were unity in the conference like all other conferences, it would be and remain in the top 3 P5 programs competitively and financially

Not with 10 teams it wouldn't. Why do you think the PAC 12, ACC, Big Ten and SEC all expanded? More revenues.
 
Buck, it seems to me the most important aspect of expansion is to expand the broadcast footprint of the conference. The current level of athletic competitiveness by teams aspiring to join the conference is relatively unimportant provided they are committed to improvements..

If athletic facilities are adequate or better for all sports it comes down to available TV sets and academics. That is what makes Cincinnati and UCF attractive. Those two teams could nearly double the potential audience of Big 12 teams for broadcast networks.

The estimated 2016 population of Texas is approximately 26 million, Florida has 20 million and Ohio has 11.5 million. While Cincinnati nor UCF have the support of their entire 31 million plus citizens, UT, TCU, Texas Tech and Baylor are not the only major universities in the state. A&M and Houston also enjoy substantial support.

The B1G took in two losing athletic programs in Rutgers and Maryland for a reason. They were just rewarded for those moves by the broadcast networks.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT