Trump: Many of the allies I don’t know because we have so many allies so I don’t know exactly what you’re talking about.
Authentic Trumpian gibberish.
Authentic Trumpian gibberish.
Trump: Many of the allies I don’t know because we have so many allies so I don’t know exactly what you’re talking about.
Authentic Trumpian gibberish.
I'll be happy to hear how it's answered when Trump explains how he wanted to know why those vote counts at State Farm arena were cancelled with 96% of the State's precincts reporting and him well ahead?Trump: Many of the allies I don’t know because we have so many allies so I don’t know exactly what you’re talking about.
Authentic Trumpian gibberish.
Trump: Many of the allies I don’t know because we have so many allies so I don’t know exactly what you’re talking about.
Authentic Trumpian gibberish.
Hahahaha. I’m more interested how biff answers these questions under oath before he goes to jail.Trump: Many of the allies I don’t know because we have so many allies so I don’t know exactly what you’re talking about.
Authentic Trumpian gibberish.
Hahahaha. I’m more interested how biff answers these questions under oath before he goes to jail.
Goes to jail for what? None of you mind numbed TDS infected Leftists can name the actual crime Trump committed.Hahahaha. I’m more interested how biff answers these questions under oath before he goes to jail.
OK moe...so explain why they had to stop counting votes before Biden won?
moetard, if I gave you a basket of tomatoes to recount and called it a basket of oranges, would the number change? Again, If you recounted it, would the number change? Do you understand what I’m trying to dumb down for your little stupid brain?
BBBBBBBBBAAAAAAHHHHh...if ignorance is bliss you must be just thrilledTrump: Many of the allies I don’t know because we have so many allies so I don’t know exactly what you’re talking about.
Authentic Trumpian gibberish.
If you read the linked article, the Judge who refused to hear Trump's challenge claimed there was no "standing" in the case. Never explained why not?moetard, if I gave you a basket of tomatoes to recount and called it a basket of oranges, would the number change? Again, If you recounted it, would the number change? Do you understand what I’m trying to dumb down for your little stupid brain?
(from the video clip)Here is CBS News footage from the night of the elections in Georgia just after they stopped counting the votes.
President Trump was leading in Georgia over 166,448 votes.
When I think how much we got cheated in 2020 my blood boils because one has to be really stupid to think that basement dummy got 81 million votes.
He won’t get close to testifying.Hahahaha. I’m more interested how biff answers these questions under oath before he goes to jail.
He won’t get close to testifying.
Why do you refuse to answer a fairly simple and straightforward question?He won’t get close to testifying.
That’s exactly how they got away with it. If these judges refuse to hear any of the cases, they don’t have to rule on them. I’m sure it’s a combination of fear and/or being compromised.If you read the linked article, the Judge who refused to hear Trump's challenge claimed there was no "standing" in the case. Never explained why not?
See this is the problem with the Left when it comes to charging Trump with a crime simply because he wanted those ballots verified not switched from Biden to him! We know there were issues with voter registrations here. We know those vote machines were compromised. We still don't know why they suddenly stopped counting with Trump well ahead. (it wasn't because of a water main break)
None of that has ever been looked into or adequately answered, but it's not a crime to ask! I hope during Trump's trial here he can finally ask why none of this was ever investigated? Maybe if we get an answer they'll stop accusing him of trying to overthrow the election and get to the bottom of if all those extra votes for Biden were legitimate?
“Soaring Bleater” is severely infected with TDS.Can you get any closer to his sack?
It's one thing to dismiss the case. Quite another to dismiss it without an explanation or at least hearing the evidence then deciding it's without merit! We had sworn affidavits, chain of custody violations, unauthorized unsigned ballots, mis-matched voter registrations, and voting machines that had clearly been compromised and none of that was ever investigated.That’s exactly how they got away with it. If these judges refuse to hear any of the cases, they don’t have to rule on them. I’m sure it’s a combination of fear and/or being compromised.
You see how he won't even attempt to answer the question I asked him in post #20? He'll scream and complain all day long that Trump tried to "steal" or "overthrow" Georgia's election results, but he can't offer the legitimate reason why Trump was wrong to suspect those final vote counts? Seems to me if Trump's claims were bogus or made up, he could easily and factually explain what makes them so? Or at the very least, he could offer the factual explanation as to why those vote counts were suspended while Trump was comfortably ahead?“Soaring Bleater” is severely infected with TDS.
Here’s the truth, if they could prove Trump’s allegations were false, they would.You see how he won't even attempt to answer the question I asked him in post #20? He'll scream and complain all day long that Trump tried to "steal" or "overthrow" Georgia's election results, but he can't offer the legitimate reason why Trump was wrong to suspect those final vote counts? Seems to me if Trump's claims were bogus or made up, he could easily and factually explain what makes them so? Or at the very least, he could offer the factual explanation as to why those vote counts were suspended while Trump was comfortably ahead?
He can't.
Exactly! In fact they never prove it. They just keep screaming....there's no evidence of widespread voter fraud (while they ignore piles of it)Here’s the truth, if they could prove Trump’s allegations were false, they would.
It’s interesting because Democrats are always throwing allegations around, but when was the last time they were right? When was the last time they provided the evidence? Adam Schiff claimed he personally saw the Russian collusion evidence. Why isn’t he required to provide it and where it is?Exactly! In fact they never prove it. They just keep screaming....there's no evidence of widespread voter fraud (while they ignore piles of it)
Hillary and just about every Dem I can think of constantly wailed that Trump's election in '16 was "illegitimate". Why weren't any of them "indicted" for being "election deniers"? Who ordered that illegal spying operation on Trump? Why no investigations into that?It’s interesting because Democrats are always throwing allegations around, but when was the last time they were right? When was the last time they provided the evidence? Adam Schiff claimed he personally saw the Russian collusion evidence. Why isn’t he required to provide it and where it is?
As I say, anyone still voting Democrat is an idiot.Hillary and just about every Dem I can think of constantly wailed that Trump's election in '16 was "illegitimate". Why weren't any of them "indicted" for being "election deniers"? Who ordered that illegal spying operation on Trump? Why no investigations into that?
These people disgust me with the crap they get away with while accusing others of exactly what they do!
I just made a small edit there for 'ya @ThePunish-EERAs I say, anyone (who is) still a Democrat is an idiot.