Curious, whether new coaching contracts can involve tampering clauses? Curious as to why they don’t already have such clauses.
It’s interesting who actually has the leverage in these situations. On one hand, you have the school who wants to protect their brand , the athletic department and the student athletes.
On the other hand, you have an individual who was trying not to lock themselves in to a situation they don’t want to be in.
I’ll be the first to admit I’ve never read any of these contracts that are provided through the freedom of information act. I imagine if such protective clauses aren’t already in place and that wren will be doing a significant investigation on how to protect the university further going forward.
Has there been any movement on NIL contracts? I haven’t seen anything regarding this.
It’s interesting who actually has the leverage in these situations. On one hand, you have the school who wants to protect their brand , the athletic department and the student athletes.
On the other hand, you have an individual who was trying not to lock themselves in to a situation they don’t want to be in.
I’ll be the first to admit I’ve never read any of these contracts that are provided through the freedom of information act. I imagine if such protective clauses aren’t already in place and that wren will be doing a significant investigation on how to protect the university further going forward.
Has there been any movement on NIL contracts? I haven’t seen anything regarding this.
