Another Dem Asshole Calls for Violence

[ThePunish-EER]

You idiot...Smith had TONS of time to bring Trump to trial BEFORE his inauguration..He chose to not to do it because the majority of legal experts said Smith would lose.
Instead Garland and Smith tried to stop Trumps election by the vote of the American...they lost .

Exactly. Liberals are all too stupid to distinguish theater from reality. Nobody, including Smith or Garland truly believed they would ever get Trump to trial and then jail him. It was all a huge deception aimed at average Americans who rely on news because they’re too stupid to learn or too lazy to look things up. Democrats were banking on everyone to be fooled and become moe and vote for Kamala.

 

[atlkvb]

Exactly. Liberals are all too stupid to distinguish theater from reality. Nobody, including Smith or Garland truly believed they would ever get Trump to trial and then jail him. It was all a huge deception aimed at average Americans who rely on news because they’re too stupid to learn or too lazy to look things up. Democrats were banking on everyone to be fooled and become moe and vote for Kamala.

Exactly! The "smear" and commensurate bad headlines was worth it politically for them to keep Trump from being considered a viable candidate.

It worked on @moe (just like the Russia,Russia,Russia collusion scam) but thankfully damn near 200 million other American voters aren't as gullible as @moe is. 🙄

 

[atlkvb]

Dem calls for "fighting" caused this !!!!!!!!

"They're never going to stop" Kamala Harris.

 

[moe]

Smith had TONS of time to bring Trump to trial BEFORE his inauguration..He chose to not to do it because the majority of legal experts said Smith would lose.

Did you sleep through the last 4 years? why do you repeat your failed MAGA theory about why he dropped the cases? DOJ doesn't allow the prosecution of a sitting POTUS. Trump's lackey judge in Florida dismissed the documents case on flawed legal theory.

The chief reason the case has been stalled is the Supreme Court’s handling of Trump’s bid for immunity. Last month, the high court ruled that Trump has “absolute immunity” from some of the special counsel’s allegations. But that decision also left many questions unresolved about how the rest of the case can proceed in Chutkan’s courtroom.
a termination that is required, Smith said, by Justice Department policy that bars continuing the prosecutions once Trump is inaugurated.

 

[SoCo]

White House officials bristle as the courts throttle parts of Trump's agenda

Do you read anything other than MAGA disinformation? Your Jack Smith statement is total nonsense.

Special counsel Jack Smith says evidence against Trump was enough to convict him
Special counsel Jack Smith moves to drop both federal criminal cases against Trump

Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday dropped one of his criminal cases against President-elect Donald Trump and was on the verge of dropping the other — a termination that is required, Smith said, by Justice Department policy that bars continuing the prosecutions once Trump is inaugurated.
The report says the evidence would have led to Trump’s conviction at trial, “but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency.” Longstanding Justice Department policy prohibits prosecuting a sitting president.

Smith said he fully stood behind the decision to bring the cases: “To have done otherwise on the facts developed during our work would have been to shirk my duties as a prosecutor and a public servant. After nearly 30 years of public service, that is a choice I could not abide.”

You fell for it. Again.

 

[SoCo]

"They're never going to stop" Kamala Harris.

"...... nor should they."

Can't leave that part out!

 

[ThePunish-EER]

Did you sleep through the last 4 years? why do you repeat your failed MAGA theory about why he dropped the cases? DOJ doesn't allow the prosecution of a sitting POTUS. Trump's lackey judge in Florida dismissed the documents case on flawed legal theory.

The chief reason the case has been stalled is the Supreme Court’s handling of Trump’s bid for immunity. Last month, the high court ruled that Trump has “absolute immunity” from some of the special counsel’s allegations. But that decision also left many questions unresolved about how the rest of the case can proceed in Chutkan’s courtroom.
a termination that is required, Smith said, by Justice Department policy that bars continuing the prosecutions once Trump is inaugurated.

While that is true about a sitting President, they also lacked evidence of an actual crime. Otherwise the Senate would’ve removed him. Feel free to prove me wrong lol

 

[atlkvb]

While that is true about a sitting President, they also lacked evidence of an actual crime. Otherwise the Senate would’ve removed him. Feel free to prove me wrong lol

I've already challenged him to tell us what part of the U.S. criminal code Trump violated (allegedly). Unless he searches some Left wing hack websites, he can't...not on his own off the top of his pointy head.

 

[atlkvb]

You fell for it. Again.

Propaganda is easy for the easily propagandized