Did you read the article? Taylor was a witness to none of what he claimed.
He wasn't a witness to conversations he had? lol. What a realty you swallowers live in.
Please "do me a favor"--
Again, 2nd and 3rd hand and makes his own conclusions. He said in the statement if you read it, it was made clear there was no quid pro quo.
That's how investigations work. There absolutely was a quid pro quo. And it doesn't matter, He is the President of the United States of America. Allegedly, He withheld Congressional mandated funds (against the law) and wanted a public announcement of an investigation into His political rival (against the law and whatever silly quid pro quo standard you nuts are trying to hide behind).
The Justice Department doesn't matter in an impeachment. Try and keep up.
Minds are made up. That you don't know the difference in those 2 statements says all we need to know about you.Let's make up our minds...
So says Trump. The President of the United States asked a foreign government to investigate a political rival. You think any foreign government doesn't see that as a mafia boss asking for a favor? lmao.
Don't seem to be having much trouble at all. Simpleton Trumpers are easily fooled, but I wouldn't cast the same net over the other 65% of the country. The Justice Department can't say the President broke any law, per their policy. Hence the Framers giving the legislature branch impeachment powers. Try and read up on a few Federalist Papers and our Constitution.
Because the President can't break the law, per their DOJ rules. Hence, impeachment. Do I have to keep telling you these obvious things over and over?
Obama was Putins bitch? A Trumptard saying that with a straight face.![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
