SO, if Don Mcgahn followed Trump's order, would Trump be guilty of obstruction?
Mueller is a complete Buffoon.....
- Thread starter bornaneer
- Start date
SO, if Don Mcgahn followed Trump's order, would Trump be guilty of obstruction?
Nah, this is just another rehash of the same old crap hoping to get the public interested in something they are not.
I'm glad this dog and pony show finishes today. Unless you want to call Cohen up to the stand again, that would be entertaining.
Jim Jordan just destroyed Mueller...so much so Mueller "doesn't want to get into it".
![[eyeroll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/rolleye/rolleye0011.r191677.gif "Eye roll [eyeroll]")
Congenital liars know "state-of-the-art" when they see it.
Rep. John Ratcliffe former U.S Attorney broke that down for you. Mueller is getting beat like a rented mule.
lol The report is out, Mueller is giving testimony and here you are trying to spin sh*t and rewrite history, good stuff.
Jim Jordan just destroyed Mueller...so much so Mueller "doesn't want to get into it".
Congenital liars know "state-of-the-art" when they see it.
Ohio state wrestling team
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...jim-jordan-did-nothing-about-abusive-n1016926
Wasn’t Steele “fired” for having contact with news media? I don’t think the reliability of his information was in questionThe FBI fired Steele and said his "information" was unreliable. Try and keep up nowhere Man.
"he's a real nowhere man...sitting in his no where land"
"No where man please listen, you don't know what you're missing......"
Edited, mistype: The State Department received it first, and had questions about authenticity within 48 hours of receiving it.
Last edited:
An attempt to obstruct an investigation is still considered obstruction.
There are still questions about the authenticity of information in the dossier. That doesn’t mean they are lies.
Where’s the FISA app?
Nowhere man don't worry
Take your time, don't hurry
Leave it all 'til somebody else
Lends you a hand
Ah, la, la, la, la
Lisa Page and her boyfriend Pete texted Steele's information was all bogus.
Last edited:
Sorry to be so late...but here is the first lie.
Doug Collins, R-Ga., focused his questions on the former Special Counsel's findings that the investigation did not establish any conspiracy between President Trump and Russia. Collins asked Mueller if "conspiracy" and "collusion" were colloquially the same thing, and Mueller said no. Collins then quoted Mueller's own report, which indicated otherwise.
So if what you say is true then Mueller will be charged with perjury and go to jail. I guess we'll see who's lying (again) before too long.
I guess people can hire someone to murder an ex spouse and that's ok as long as no one dies.
No, that's attempted murder. There's no such thing as attempted obstruction.
"attempted obstruction of justice"
?Obstructing of Justice Under Federal Jurisdiction
Obstruction of justice is defined by federal statute as any "interference with the orderly administration of law and justice" and governed by 18 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1521. Federal code identifies more than 20 specific types of obstruction, including "Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees" (18 U.S.C. § 1505), the specific code section cited in the Nixon and Clinton articles of impeachment.
Other ways an individual may commit this offense include, but are not limited to, the following acts:
- Influencing or injuring an officer or juror generally (18 U.S.C. § 1503)
- Obstruction of criminal investigations (18 U.S.C. § 1510)
- Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (18 U.S.C. § 1512)
- Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant (18 U.S.C. § 1513)
- Destruction of corporate audit records (18 U.S.C. § 1520)
Where does it say anything under that explanation of the law of "attempted obstruction"? What's the crime Mueller was "attempted obstructed" from investigating?
What's "justice" in a counter espionage investigation?
Not even a relativist can follow your twisted logic.
Last edited:
Now explain how that jives with the President's legal right to have him fired?
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/13/can-trump-fire-special-counsel-robert-mueller-239500
Obstruction would be something like Trump destroying emails that Mueller is requesting or has under subpoena.
![[winking]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/wink.r191677.gif "Winking [winking]")
So, you are going on the record to say officially that Mueller will be charged with perjury
Jordan and company will request and recommend, but it will die there, like all of the others have.
In the case of why he never charged Trump with "obstruction" citing DOJ guidelines...he clearly lied about that because there was no such restriction preventing him from indicting the President for a crime he committed or was suspected of committing. He says that's why he didn't charge him. That's a lie.
That's perjury
Last edited:
Mueller has admitted no conspiracy numerous times and just told Rep Leiu that just because he going through the obstruction articles doesn't means he agrees with his his assertions.
If Mueller isn't drunk or high he's about as ignorant of the Law as he is of what's in his own report. What a disaster he's been!
Similar threads
Opinion: The Supreme Court just showed us that Trump is not incompetent. He's a master of corruption
