Marshall has a few huge morons on their board. But I am not sure any of them can compete with you. Did you get those pictures from the U.S. Track & Field website again when you were learning about NCAA rules, moron?
The pictures you posted of Kansas State's stadium are years and years old. Over the last five years, they have put in nearly $200 million in their facilities. They also announced last year another huge investment coming up.
This is the new stadium:
http://www.kstatesports.com/page/facilities-football
And here are some videos of their new facilties over the last couple of years since I know you aren't much of a reader:
And, yes, they have an indoor. It happens to be the biggest in the nation (unless recently surpassed). I mean, it isn't quite like the pony-league indoor wvu has that can't fit a full field, has many punts/kickoffs hitting the netting, and forgot to put any windows in it, but hey, not everyone can have an indoor that is 20 years old like wvu.
The renovations at Kansas State have them overwhelmingly in front of wvu in football facilities. It isn't even close. Their stadium is immensely better. Have you seen everything else in the videos (locker room, lounge, player media area, player academic area, training area, weight room, coach's offices, lobbies, hospitality area, etc.)? It isn't even close.
This wasn't a knock on wvu. It was more of praise for Dana doing a decent job considering your facilities are one of the bottom three in the conference. And that really can't be argued.
Facility rankings aren't based just on stadium size (or just a stadium). Regardless, KSU's stadium is far, far better than the 'Pusk. Their other facilities just steamroll wvu even more.
Stick to comparing your facilities to Iowa State and Kansas (though not for long). Those are your peers.