The guys running away, not standing off.Turning that taser was a threat. He suffered the consequences. Cop should not lose his job for that. Maybe suspended for losing control of the situation, both of them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The guys running away, not standing off.Turning that taser was a threat. He suffered the consequences. Cop should not lose his job for that. Maybe suspended for losing control of the situation, both of them.
And what does a taser do? It puts a person down and makes them defenseless. Not sure it deserves being shot, but I wasn't in that situation where a criminal was evading arrest, fleeing, and then pointing a weapon at me as I pursued him.It was a taser.
The guys running away, not standing off.
The guy was 27 and inebriated. The arrest can happen at another time. Cops do it with high speed chases. The cops were great up until they tried to cuff him. If they were unsure they could get the job done, they should’ve waiting for more officers on scene. Imo, the cops fvcked up. These are Americans. Putting bullets in his back is what I bemoan. Fvcking ego on some people, winning is everything.The rational course is to not bemoan the death of a man who had a DUI to the point of passing out in the fvcking drive through, resisted arrest, assaulted a police officer, evaded capture, stole a weapon, fired the weapon at police. Also, the rational course is understanding, once the decision is made to affect the arrest, it’s happening, the ref isn’t picking up the flag or waiving it off.
The irony is this is the exact scenario cautioned against when people bitch about police brutality. Here you have 2 cops doing the right thing through the entire encounter and then shit goes awry. How much of their subduing him was constrained due to current events? In the past, he’d have likely been beat up pretty good, but he’d be alive. All that, and now what’s the narrative? We should just let him go, it’s not like what he was doing was a big deal.The cops certainly could've acted differently.
However, even running away he was pointing a weapon (yes, a tazer) at them. That's not much different than shooting at from a vehicle running from the cops.
If a taser is just as lethal as a sidearm, why do cops have tasers?The cops certainly could've acted differently.
However, even running away he was pointing a weapon (yes, a tazer) at them. That's not much different than shooting at from a vehicle running from the cops.
You’re literally advocating letting a criminal go. Do you not see how fvcked your position is? It’s a never ending movement of the goal posts and at the onset of the left’s arguments built on a lie in Ferguson, the position was retardedly naive.The guy was 27 and inebriated. The arrest can happen at another time. Cops do it with high speed chases. The cops were great up until they tried to cuff him. If they were unsure they could get the job done, they should’ve waiting for more officers on scene. Imo, the cops fvcked up. These are Americans. Putting bullets in his back is what I bemoan. Fvcking ego on some people, winning is everything.
Because you all cried about shooting people.If a taser is just as lethal as a sidearm, why do cops have tasers?
Attitude of Americans and policy of the police needs to change and is reflected in this thread. The cop failed to put him under arrest and he got away. No shots should be fired. Put out a warrant for his arrest. He would be caught and would be alive. This isn't a new approach but an old one that does work for this type of incident where no one was threatened and deadly force is not warranted.
The taser is used to temporarily incapacitate someone. The guy who ran should have done like most of us would, and simply cooperate with the officer. What if, the guy running would have incapacitated the cop with the taser, then while he was down, grabbed his gun, and shot him with his own weapon? This just seems to be a case where there's no wrong or right side here. It simply evolved into an unfortunate situation, and most cops I watched interviewed both yesterday and this morning, indicated they would have likely acted the same way, although they admitted it's easy to play Monday morning quarterback and possibly reacted differently, but during the heat of the moment, you literally have no time to think prior to your normal, trained reactions.If a taser is just as lethal as a sidearm, why do cops have tasers?
Current events showed a fvcking cop, behind his shiny badge, laying his knee on a guys neck up until and after he was unresponsive for 3 minutes. How can you fvcking compare the two? Once again, the white badass Marine says “law and order” is allowed to do whatever in the name of “winning the scene”, and laughs that there’s one less scumbag off the streets - while loved ones grieve and communities feel disconnected from the government that polices them.The irony is this is the exact scenario cautioned against when people bitch about police brutality. Here you have 2 cops doing the right thing through the entire encounter and then shit goes awry. How much of their subduing him was constrained due to current events? In the past, he’d have likely been beat up pretty good, but he’d be alive. All that, and now what’s the narrative? We should just let him go, it’s not like what he was doing was a big deal.
These fvcking people have to be stopped from having a voice. They’re going to destroy order in this country. Fvcking academics.
Only argument worth listening to - all else is placing the badge above citizens - and we’ve seen clearly very recently that some don’t deserve to wear the badge in the first place.And car jacking someone or he takes someone hostage during the next arrest is not a possibility is it? He resisted once, what will be different about the next one? Hate to say it, but if you play stupid games you win stupid prizes. And yes, if my kids did exactly what this guy did, I would mourn, but I would also realize he made very bad choices that contributed to his demise.
I agree there is no right or wrong side here. And this situation isn’t as clear. But Americans shouldn’t be shot in the back by our police force.The taser is used to temporarily incapacitate someone. The guy who ran should have done like most of us would, and simply cooperate with the officer. What if, the guy running would have incapacitated the cop with the taser, then while he was down, grabbed his gun, and shot him with his own weapon? This just seems to be a case where there's no wrong or right side here. It simply evolved into an unfortunate situation, and most cops I watched interviewed both yesterday and this morning, indicated they would have likely acted the same way, although they admitted it's easy to play Monday morning quarterback and possibly reacted differently, but during the heat of the moment, you literally have no time to think prior to your normal, trained reactions.
This is a legit argument, imo. If this cat, pumped up on adrenaline and already fvcked up and making bad decisions harms someone after this interaction, the cops would have to live with that. But that doesn’t justify taking the guys life, imo. And even if something does happen, it goes back to the fact that the cops should’ve subdued him when they had the chance. Running and resisting isn’t a capital offense.
behind his shiny badge
I doubt good cops feel that way. But maybe we should focus a bit more on training our police force to avoid these situations. They talked to this guy for 20+ min, if they were unsure they could subdue him (because of his size, whatever) then they should stall until more units arrive and it’s for sure. Once he got away, that cop should’ve either chased until he couldn’t chase anymore, called for more units to close down the area, or went back to the scene impounded the vehicle, and placed the warrant on the guy for arrest - and took the ass chewing from his superior in the am.If I'm front lines in law enforcement...I would not enforce anything moving forward. If the guy wants to drive away, let him. If someone committed a felony, let them. It's not worth it any more. The criminals have won and nothing short of a total crackdown will put the genie back in the bottle.
My wife talked a lot this weekend. We are so glad to be back in WV after spending the last 30 years in Cinti, Louisville and between NYC and Philly. I have no desire to hang in a larger city moving forward, although I am sure we will be NYC and Philly in the next 3 months.
I was being poetic - like a unicorn is supposed to be. Don’t wipe up the glitterFake news, his badge was sewn on. Looked ghetto as all getout.
If a taser is just as lethal as a sidearm, why do cops have tasers?
I think it was pretty clear it was his taser. Wasn’t the cat patted down during the field sobriety?In real time, would you be 100% sure that it was a taser or a gun that he had in his hand...because that was his decision to make in 1/10th of a second. I do training for a living...when I ratchet up the pace/speed of an exercise, errors rise in relation to the increase in stress and diminished processing time...Since this is a sports site, it's exactly why they blitz QB's...to quicken the pace and force bad decisions.
I doubt good cops feel that way. But maybe we should focus a bit more on training our police force to avoid these situations. They talked to this guy for 20+ min, if they were unsure they could subdue him (because of his size, whatever) then they should stall until more units arrive and it’s for sure. Once he got away, that cop should’ve either chased until he couldn’t chase anymore, called for more units to close down the area, or went back to the scene impounded the vehicle, and placed the warrant on the guy for arrest - and took the ass chewing from his superior in the am.
Firing into the guys back shouldn’t have been in his head as an option, imo.
I think it was pretty clear it was his taser. Wasn’t the cat patted down during the field sobriety?
That is a shame, I agree. All the more reason this discussion should’ve been had - seriously - long ago. And, imo, it’s not all about racism, it’s about how serious being an officer is, and that some people shouldn’t be permitted the honor of holding a position of power over American citizens.I hope they don't but in reality it's happening. Seattle is losing more officers by the day. That will be a national trend. Another effect of this is, the tenured officers are taking early retirement leaving more vacancies to be filled with more novice officers...who will be challenged more often.
It’s fvcking bright yellowHe got a taser from the other officer, how did he know it was not his revolver? 50/50 chance it was a gun.
It’s fvcking bright yellow
You have no idea if the guy would continue to run if the cop goes down. He's already proven he's willing to do anything to avoid arrest. How many cops are killed every year when their gun is taken? Under guidelines, cop is likely to be vindicated.
Yeah, but you had no problem calling me a moron,
So, if the taser had hit the officer, he goes down, what's to prevent the perp from coming back and grabbing his gun? He's already proven he's stupid enough to fight them and grab the taser. Sorry, once you point something at the officer, you run the risk of being lawfully shot.The cop will have to justify his use of deadly force. Despite everyone's opinion if he can't justify it he's going to be guilty of murder. 3 cops I talked to and watched that video with don't think deadly force was required. We'll see what a jury says because he is being charged with homicide.
You have no idea if the guy would continue to run if the cop goes down. He's already proven he's willing to do anything to avoid arrest. How many cops are killed every year when their gun is taken? Under guidelines, cop is likely to be vindicated.
So, if the taser had hit the officer, he goes down, what's to prevent the perp from coming back and grabbing his gun? He's already proven he's stupid enough to fight them and grab the taser. Sorry, once you point something at the officer, you run the risk of being lawfully shot.
That cop should be charged with murder.....the man was shot in the back for Gods sake.The cop will have to justify his use of deadly force. Despite everyone's opinion if he can't justify it he's going to be guilty of murder. 3 cops I talked to and watched that video with don't think deadly force was required. We'll see what a jury says because he is being charged with homicide.
That cop should be charged with murder.....the man was shot in the back for Gods sake.
Folks should watch the video I posted earlier in the thread on "shoot or don't shoot"? It's a tough call and if you make the wrong decision you're either a dead man or guilty of involuntary manslaughter.
Posting it again here
I know I'll be in the minority here but I see it as a justified shooting.
Think about it... if the roles were reversed...
1) A white man resists the arrest of two black police officers
2) In the attempt to resist he gains control of one of the officers tasers
3) In his attempt to flee he fires the taser at one of the officers
4) Almost instantaneously, the officers fire and kill him.
Would this even be a story? Would anyone outside of the Atlanta Metro area even know about this? Would those cops be under the scrutiny these officers are?
No.
People are looking at this situation through the lens of George Floyd and it is obstructing their view of the matter. These officers were courteous and professional right up until the time the suspect altered his behavior. The assumption the officers SHOULD have been able to do this or do that to gain control of an unruly suspect is flawed thinking. In moments of crisis, when fight or flight takes over and the adrenaline starts pumping, people's behaviors become erratic.
The facts are these - the suspect resisted arrest, he took a weapon from an officer and fired the weapon at the officer and was shot dead within a mere second or two afterward.
Everything else is irrelevant.
My point was, what about all of the current events potentially drove the police to have a less aggressive posture in this encounter than what was potentially available to them which would have negated this getting out of control.Current events showed a fvcking cop, behind his shiny badge, laying his knee on a guys neck up until and after he was unresponsive for 3 minutes. How can you fvcking compare the two? Once again, the white badass Marine says “law and order” is allowed to do whatever in the name of “winning the scene”, and laughs that there’s one less scumbag off the streets - while loved ones grieve and communities feel disconnected from the government that polices them.
Yet the problem is academics, and the answer is more force, less compassion, and less discussion. Go ahead and tuck those sheets to regulation, and expect the rest of the world to do the same.
Says someone who passionately defends his 2nd amendment Rights, so that the government can never have power over the people?Simple solution, never put yourself in a position where a cop has to make that decision.
It didn’t stop them from shooting the man in the back.My point was, what about all of the current events potentially drove the police to have a less aggressive posture in this encounter than what was potentially available to them which would have negated this getting out of control.
Simple solution, never put yourself in a position where a cop has to make that decision.
Would it have come to that without all of the melodrama of the last couple of months?It didn’t stop them from shooting the man in the back.
I don’t know, but I think of those cops were going to draw and fire- they were likely to employ any tactic they’ve been trained to use to subdue. There was 2 of them, with tasers, he should’ve been cuffed and stuffed. Don’t blame the protests against a horrible act.Would it have come to that without all of the melodrama of the last couple of months?