WVU + 14 1/2...looks kind of interesting to me! Nobody
- Thread starter Tonycried
- Start date
I'm pretty fed up with Holgs at this point. Burning the redshirt for 2 QBs just so they can play WR ...
Well....if he losses the next two games, you'll be seeing the backside of him!
Not touching it. It wouldn't surprise me if we won, and at the same time it wouldn't surprise me if we have 4 turnovers and lose by 20. Never should have lost to Ok State.
Agree that WVU beat itself with OSU. TCU is a bit schizo as well, they play great one week and wallow the next!
We haven't played a team remotely as bad as Charlotte. We did throttle three teams far superior to Charlotte, by a much larger margin...
Liberty is in Charlotte's ball park and you played them at home. 21 on the road sounds about right to me....maybe drift up to 22 which of course is another score!
What is 30 spots or so, between friends. Both are bad, but Charlotte is a whole 'nother level of suckiness...
No question the 49ers are very bad, but point spreads are not a prediction of how Vegas thinks the game will end up, they are an attempt to attract equal money wagered on both sides. Sagaran rankings are not a variable in the calculations. Personally, I think 21-22 is about right for the spread with the game being in Charlotte but I think WVU would cover.
I think that you guys will beat them by at least 30, with your second string getting a lot of time. Your defense may even pitch a shutout against the Jeff Mullen lead offense.
You are correct, but Jeff Mullen did it with good players. He doesn't have that luxury at a school with worse players than 60-80 IAA teams...
Last edited:
I don't know the Herd in it's current configuration is awfully young....30 may be too many but as you point out Charlotte is really horrible!
