Compared to what we face now in the big 12, the big east was never goodHmm? Broad question with multiple answers. Early years, with Miami, VT and BC were pretty awesome with great national attention and huge conference rivalry. As I recall Miami was one of the first BCS champs.
After the group left for the ACC it was somewhT diminished, but still strong internally if not so much externally. National attention slipped somewhat.
At the end, last three-year period, it was a joke of a cluster-f**k.
This sums it up perfect.....Surely you mean "What was the BE like on Thursday Nights?" because that's where ESPN stuck all the good matchups.
After BC, Miami and VT bailed, the "Big East Game of The Week" televised on Saturdays was usually a tussle between teams like Cincy, UConn, USF, Pitt, and Rutgers. In other words, the BE "Game of The Week" was a noontime snoozefest amongst the Little Sisters of The Poor.
Agree with you here, the early years Involved some damn good football, the latter not so much other than Pitt/Ville and the Bearcats under Kelly perhaps...I think this conference is a tougher nut to crack on the whole vs the orig BE...Miami, VT, were solid programs, but Ok, Baylor, Tex, KSU, TCU, Okie St...any and or all are in a dogfight and I love it...the basketball ain't too shabby either imo...Hated the later years of football besides Pitt and Louisville. WVU was beginning to build a damn good rivalvary with Louisville in both football and basketball. Big 12 should have invited them too: WVU, TCU, Louisville, and Team X. They would be at 12 teams and Louisville would have been a very fine addition in both sports.
Big East basketball was fun. It seemed almost every team was legit besides Depaul, Providence, South Florida, etc. Providence and South Florida started to become good when WVU, Pitt, Syracuse, etc left though. But basketball was fun.