ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Used Classified Docs as Scrap Paper for To-Do Lists

Soaring Eagle 74

All-Conference
Jan 4, 2008
9,667
2,622
668
Molly Michael, who worked as an assistant to Trump between 2018 and 2022, revealed to federal investigators that Trump repeatedly sent her directives handwritten on notecards that contained classified markings.

Michael's testimony could now become a key factor in proving prosecutors' allegations that Trump not only retained classified documents he had no right to after leaving office, but that he shared the contents of the materials with individuals unauthorized to view them.
 
Molly Michael, who worked as an assistant to Trump between 2018 and 2022, revealed to federal investigators that Trump repeatedly sent her directives handwritten on notecards that contained classified markings.

Michael's testimony could now become a key factor in proving prosecutors' allegations that Trump not only retained classified documents he had no right to after leaving office, but that he shared the contents of the materials with individuals unauthorized to view them.

Did Trump shart, make you come up for air and clean yourself up again?

Such is the life of a punch-n-run bleater.
 
Molly Michael, who worked as an assistant to Trump between 2018 and 2022, revealed to federal investigators that Trump repeatedly sent her directives handwritten on notecards that contained classified markings.

Michael's testimony could now become a key factor in proving prosecutors' allegations that Trump not only retained classified documents he had no right to after leaving office, but that he shared the contents of the materials with individuals unauthorized to view them.
Note cards that contained classified markings........Sure.......Laughable
 
and as President he can declassify any or everything...

tell us about the ccp's payments to the #bidencrimefamily...

F5_QSriXUAAYqh1
 
Last edited:
Molly Michael, who worked as an assistant to Trump between 2018 and 2022, revealed to federal investigators that Trump repeatedly sent her directives handwritten on notecards that contained classified markings.

Michael's testimony could now become a key factor in proving prosecutors' allegations that Trump not only retained classified documents he had no right to after leaving office, but that he shared the contents of the materials with individuals unauthorized to view them.
^^^Soaring Retard fell for it again^^^

I would be highly embarrassed lmao!!
 
You must be a fan of Trump now since your boy Pedo Joe uses the Constitution to wipe his a$$.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Molly Michael, who worked as an assistant to Trump between 2018 and 2022, revealed to federal investigators that Trump repeatedly sent her directives handwritten on notecards that contained classified markings.

Michael's testimony could now become a key factor in proving prosecutors' allegations that Trump not only retained classified documents he had no right to after leaving office, but that he shared the contents of the materials with individuals unauthorized to view them.
Just for shits and giggles I'll ask a question. As president ,Trump can declassify anything at anytime , correct? What was on the note card that made it marked ? To point out your teenage drama queen actions I'll say this ..Biden had classified documents spread all over the country that any person who wanted could look at at anytime and he had no , none zero rights taking them at all . Hillary had a unsecured server with government documents on it ...lmao at you and you 16 year old girl drama ....
 
Trump has no moral compass and no respect for the rule of law which is why he's facing 91 felony indictments.
 
Molly Michael, who worked as an assistant to Trump between 2018 and 2022, revealed to federal investigators that Trump repeatedly sent her directives handwritten on notecards that contained classified markings.

Michael's testimony could now become a key factor in proving prosecutors' allegations that Trump not only retained classified documents he had no right to after leaving office, but that he shared the contents of the materials with individuals unauthorized to view them.
What if he "declassified" the documents before turning them into scrap paper? You are aware the President can declassified anything he chooses at any time correct?

@Soaring Eagle 74
giphy.gif

That's because you consume media only interested in brainwashing you instead of informing you. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Michael's testimony could now become a key factor in proving prosecutors' allegations that Trump not only retained classified documents he had no right to after leaving office, but that he shared the contents of the materials with individuals unauthorized to view them.
Do you not see the GIANT HOLE in this media hit piece? Go back and read the 1st qualifier again...I'll quote it for you:
"Molly Michael, who worked as an assistant to Trump between 2018 and 2022"

First of all, why on earth would the President be sharing classified information with a low level assistant. By it's very nature only certain Federal officials and members of his Cabinet & staff can see "classified" information!

Secondly, if she saw alleged classified documents while she was an assistant for Trump...(between 2018 and 2022) how were the documents under order to be turned over while Trump was still in Office during most of that time period? Once he left office (Jan 2021), how does she know what he showed her or took with him was even still "classified"? By Law, he cannot share classified materials with people unauthorized to view them, and if she saw them without authorization maybe she's the one who should be prosecuted instead of the Commander-in-Chief who can "de-classify" anything he chooses! (including anything he wanted to take with him once he left office)

I know you're a brainwashed Leftist, but that's no excuse for your lack of simple common sense when reading these media smear pieces. Good Lord!

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Trump has no moral compass and no respect for the rule of law
What "moral compass" should Trump have? Was the "rule of Law" violated while he was being illegally spied on by the Obama/Biden DOJ?
@moe
230.jpg
The "rule of Law" doesn't apply to we Democrats trying to get rid of Trump.

Sorry I asked @moe ...whatever could have come over me thinking you now favor a "moral compass" or following the "rule of Law". Lord have mercy! :eek:
giphy.gif
 
Do you not see the GIANT HOLE in this media hit piece? Go back and read the 1st qualifier again...I'll quote it for you:
"Molly Michael, who worked as an assistant to Trump between 2018 and 2022"

First of all, why on earth would the President be sharing classified information with a low level assistant. By it's very nature only certain Federal officials and members of his Cabinet & staff can see "classified" information!

Secondly, if she saw alleged classified documents while she was an assistant for Trump...(between 2018 and 2022) how were the documents under order to be turned over while Trump was still in Office during most of that time period? Once he left office (Jan 2021), how does she know what he showed her or took with him was even still "classified"? By Law, he cannot share classified materials with people unauthorized to view them, and if she saw them without authorization maybe she's the one who should be prosecuted instead of the Commander-in-Chief who can "de-classify" anything he chooses! (including anything he wanted to take with him once he left office)

I know you're a brainwashed Leftist, but that's no excuse for your lack of simple common sense when reading these media smear pieces. Good Lord!

giphy.gif
At this point it’s soo ridiculous, it rivals the National Enquirer newspaper for stupidity. First it was “Trump is a Russian spy and agent”. Those who continue to fall for such blatantly obvious fake news are morons. And Nothing less. At one time, the news at least attempted to sound believable. Now they just don’t care how dumb or impossible their narrative is. They are banking on everyone being as dumb as moe.
 
he's facing 91 felony indictments.
wow...91!!!!! That sure is a lot @moe . He must be really, really, really, really guilty? So of those 91 violations of the Law which are the worst?

The first 20...the middle 50...or the last 21? If there's just too many to single one out, give us maybe your top 2? The 2 sure fire, can't miss, clear criminal violations of Law that will send Trump to the slammer for the rest of his natural Life?

What cha got?
@moe
230.jpg
It doesn't matter which felony is the "worst" atl. He's a Felon, and all it's gonna take is just one to put his orange ass behind bars hopefully forever.

Yeah but @moe ...let's suppose he faces conviction of
obstructing an official proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 1512 or even worse, conspiracy to defraud the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 37

I mean either of those sure sound pretty terrible wouldn't you agree there 'ol @moe ? So let's say he's NOT found guilty of either of those "crimes"? Then what?

230.jpg
How can that be atl? He's as guilty as I am stupid!

Well here's why he may not be convicted of those "crimes" 'ol @moe:

Strengths of the case:
  • Trump’s efforts to subvert the election were extensive, well documented and largely in public view. He and his allies spread lies about voter fraud and stoked the protests that led to the Jan. 6 attack.
  • Many of the top aides in the Trump administration testified to the grand jury, giving investigators remarkable insight into what was happening privately in Trump’s orbit during the critical two-month period and perhaps providing important evidence about Trump’s state of mind. Pence — who resisted Trump’s pressure to try to annul the election results on Jan. 6 — was the most notable witness. Others included Trump’s former chief of staff, Mark Meadows; his White House counsel, Pat Cipollone; his national security adviser, Robert O’Brien; and his senior policy adviser, Stephen Miller.

Weaknesses of the case:
  • Trump can argue that his statements about the 2020 election were protected by the First Amendment or that, in challenging the election, he was merely relying on the advice of lawyers.
  • A president seeking to impede the peaceful transfer of power is unprecedented in American history — and the attempt to hold him legally accountable is similarly unprecedented. Some of the legal theories that prosecutors may rely on — like applying the “conspiracy against rights” statute to the context here — may raise novel issues that have rarely been tested in court.

So you see there 'ol @moe it's not a given he's going to be found "guilty" of even the most heinous of these charges. Imagine trying to prevent voters from casting their legitimate ballots after they've all been verified, and certified as perfectly legal votes? (oh wait) 🤔

If he's not convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1512 or 18 U.S.C. § 37 because he successfully argued he is protected by his 1st amendment right to free speech or his right to petition the government for grievance or protest...what is a "rule of Law" Leftist such as yourself going to do?

@moe
230.jpg
I'll just kill myself.

Poor @moe, already contemplating suicide once Trump is acquitted based on the "rule of "Law:stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

Source quoted above
Tracking the Trump criminal case
 
Last edited:
At this point it’s soo ridiculous, it rivals the National Enquirer newspaper for stupidity. First it was “Trump is a Russian spy and agent”. Those who continue to fall for such blatantly obvious fake news are morons. And Nothing less. At one time, the news at least attempted to sound believable. Now they just don’t care how dumb or impossible their narrative is. They are banking on everyone being as dumb as moe.
I'll say you have to be pretty dumb to be that dumb! ;)
 
Not only what @WVU82 points out, but I defy anyone to tell me they're paying less for the same items they were buying two years ago. Everything is more expensive...I don't care what it is. When you add up your normal spending on things you regularly bought two years ago, you clearly will see how inflation is robbing you of your purchasing power. You're either buying less of what you need, or you're paying more for it. No way you're spending less and getting more.

NO WAY! :mad:

Yup....
iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
You're facing AND loving his crotch.
Don't be mad @moe @30CAT for wanting to get some 'o deez nuts!
giphy.gif

You should stop teasing him like that DJT...thrusting your bulge into the camera like that could give 'ol @moe there heart murmurs. :joy:

@moe
230.jpg
I don't get excited just lookin' at Trump's gonads, but the idea of actually having a taste of 'em I have to admit does make my mouth water a bit!
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: 30CAT
Trump has no moral compass and no respect for the rule of law which is why he's facing 91 felony indictments.
What kind of nerve do you have talking about following a "moral compass" or the "rule of Law" when if you watched that 9 minute video in post #9 of this thread you can't be serious Biden isn't a lyin', cheating, greedy, conniving, tax dodging, law breaking traitor who sold this country out for his own financial gain?

Honestly @moe it's not your silence over this obvious Biden corruption that bothers me, it's the gall you have to claim some sort of "moral clarity" that's lacking in Trump when the guy YOU voted for is drowning in a sea of rotten a-moral filth!

It's the utter hypocrisy of you and your comrades on the Left that nauseates me. Your "morals" are about as clean as the load I dropped into my toilet after dinner tonight. Give me a break! 😝
 
At this point it’s soo ridiculous, it rivals the National Enquirer newspaper for stupidity. First it was “Trump is a Russian spy and agent”. Those who continue to fall for such blatantly obvious fake news are morons. And Nothing less. At one time, the news at least attempted to sound believable. Now they just don’t care how dumb or impossible their narrative is. They are banking on everyone being as dumb as moe.
So freaking true. I would have thought that after the Russian collusion story being 100% fabricated and shoved down their throat they would have learned to question the media, especially when it comes to Trump. Nope ....they love the Adam Schiff effects.... add in coronavirus crap where they wouldn't tell the truth about ivermecton and the false death count....nope they want a touch more Fauci effects... well they are convinced American brand of socialism will work ...I guess I understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Have you seen the
Not only what @WVU82 points out, but I defy anyone to tell me they're paying less for the same items they were buying two years ago. Everything is more expensive...I don't care what it is. When you add up your normal spending on things you regularly bought two years ago, you clearly will see how inflation is robbing you of your purchasing power. You're either buying less of what you need, or you're paying more for it. No way you're spending less and getting more.

NO WAY! :mad:

Yup....
iu
Price of drywall screws? Holy hell ...don't know if that's inflation or Lowes paying people to move stuff around every night ....
 
  • Wow
Reactions: atlkvb
Have you seen the

Price of drywall screws? Holy hell ...don't know if that's inflation or Lowes paying people to move stuff around every night ....
Try 2 pounds of boneless chicken breasts at Kroger. Two years ago...about 2.08 @.98 cents per pound. Now??? Try 5.98 @2.99 per pound! That's over 100% increase (more than double the price)...and it's just me and my Wife! I can't imagine what feeding a Family of four costs now as compared to when I was raising my bunch! Yikes!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Try 2 pounds of boneless chicken breasts at Kroger. Two years ago...about 2.19 @1.09 per pound. Now??? Try 5.98 @2.99 per pound! That's over 100% increase (more than double the price)...and it's just me and my Wife! I can't imagine what feeding a Family of four costs now as compared to when I was raising my bunch! Yikes!!!!!!!
It's crazy that's for sure . I know my paycheck don't go near as far .
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Try 2 pounds of boneless chicken breasts at Kroger. Two years ago...about 2.19 @1.09 per pound. Now??? Try 5.98 @2.99 per pound! That's over 100% increase (more than double the price)...and it's just me and my Wife! I can't imagine what feeding a Family of four costs now as compared to when I was raising my bunch! Yikes!!!!!!!

Have you gotten a burger and fries combo meal at ANY fast-food restaurant lately? $10-$15. Which, by the way, should no longer be called fast-food. Nothing fast about a drive-thru these days.

Thanks Pedo Joe!
 
Have you gotten a burger and fries combo meal at ANY fast-food restaurant lately? $10-$15. Which, by the way, should no longer be called fast-food. Nothing fast about a drive-thru these days.

Thanks Pedo Joe!
Can't even afford to take the wife out for a nice dollar menu date .
 
Have you gotten a burger and fries combo meal at ANY fast-food restaurant lately? $10-$15. Which, by the way, should no longer be called fast-food. Nothing fast about a drive-thru these days.

Thanks Pedo Joe!
As I said...everything costs more...EVERYTHING!!!! My damn water bill from Gwinnett county just went up 10.00 a month! Freakin' water!!!!!! Let's not talk about gasoline. We have to pay freight and various transport charges for the vehicles that are delivered to us....those costs have gone up in some cases 200% (the vehicles that are brought in on car carriers...driven by Diesel trucks) Our destination fees....the costs we pay for when the vehicles are transported across interstate jurisdictions are also through the roof. Guess who's paying for that? I promise you it's not the Dealership...it's our customers!

Unreal.
 
Last edited:
As I said...everything costs more...EVERYTHING!!!! My damn water bill from Gwinnett county just went up 10.00 a month! Freakin' water!!!!!! Let's not talk about gasoline. We have to pay freight and various transport charges for the vehicles that are delivered to us....those costs have gone up in some cases 200% (the vehicles that are brought in on car carriers...driven by Diesel trucks) Our destination fees....the costs we pay for when the vehicles are transported across interstate jurisdictions are also through the roof. Guess who's paying for that? I promise you it's not the Dealership...it's our customers!

Unreal.
Democrats fail to see who actually pays when government "GIVES " HANDOUTS. politicians getting rich in DC is bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
100%. They think they are "Sticking it to the rich!" when in reality they are sticking it INTO the working class.
If you rely on money from the Government, or don't really have to work all that hard for it...you probably have no problem voting Democrat. However if you bust your ass to earn a buck, (I'm in commissioned sales...I don't get paid if I don't sell!) or you're not very well off and struggle just to make ends meet, you're not likely to vote for these tax and spend Democrats. You basically want to be left alone, don't need or want their "handouts" and you're damn pissed off at the taxes they confiscate from you just to waste or give away to folks who are just sitting on their asses doin' nothing & collecting government checks! :mad:
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT