What's your opinion of Bideninflation on your assets?UUUUUUGE loss for Trump.
So much losing.
Guilty of sexual assault. Guilty of fraud. And trials to address 91 charges are on the way. Most successful conman in history is getting legally eviscerated before our eyes.UUUUUUGE loss for Trump.
So much losing.
So you'd think his popularity would be in the toilet by now with so much criminal behavior and lawlessness and all right? Nope... instead his popularity is at an all time high.Guilty of sexual assault. Guilty of fraud. And trials to address 91 charges are on the way. Most successful conman in history is getting legally eviscerated before our eyes.
Monday is court hearing about damages. The base is 200 million but the judge could determine much more based on severity of biff’s crime, maybe as much as 600 million. You Bifftards better start writing some checks.
If exaggeration is now fraud, couldn't Biden be charged with the same for exaggerating his IQ and education? I mean it's on video all the way back to 1988 when at the time ( better class of democrats) the msm called him snake bit for being a habitual lier.UUUUUUGE loss for Trump.
So much losing.
Using simple logic here...who "undervalues" anything they're trying to sell? I recently had a 2011 Explorer that was my Wife's truck in pristine condition but had 178,000 miles on it. I didn't want to give it away so I sold it. KBB (Kelly Blue Book) on it was slightly over 3K, but I had it on the market at 4500.00. It was a nice 4 wheel drive Limited, loaded with sunroof, heated leather seats, automatic load leveling, trailer package...the works. I had a guy offer me 4800.00 for it (after several other offers meeting my asking price)If
If exaggeration is now fraud, couldn't Biden be charged with the same for exaggerating his IQ and education? I mean it's on video all the way back to 1988 when at the time ( better class of democrats) the msm called him snake bit for being a habitual lier.
Asking a modern day Democrat to understand any part of that would be like asking dogs to stop sniffing each others butt.Using simple logic here...who "undervalues" anything they're trying to sell? I recently had a 2011 Explorer that was my Wife's truck in pristine condition but had 178,000 miles on it. I didn't want to give it away so I sold it. KBB (Kelly Blue Book) on it was slightly over 3K, but I had it on the market at 4500.00. It was a nice 4 wheel drive Limited, loaded with sunroof, heated leather seats, automatic load leveling, trailer package...the works. I had a guy offer me 4800.00 for it (after several other offers meeting my asking price)
Did I tell him it was only worth only 3K? No... I sold it to him @ 4800.00.
So Trump overvalues his real estate holdings? He can price it at whatever he thinks the market will bear, unless someone pays his asking price it doesn't mean didly squat. Leftists are so desperate. Instead of coming up with a plan to control our open border and stop this illegal invasion, they're worried what Trump thinks his various property holdings in decaying New York City are worth?
I wouldn't buy real estate up there if they were giving it away!
Never expect Leftists to understand basic economics. They think deficits are caused by tax cuts.Asking a modern day Democrat to understand any part of that would be like asking dogs to stop sniffing each others butt.
Good job on the explorer. Trump's property was/is worth what someone is willing to pay for it . If Trump felt it was worth a billion than it's worth a billion.
My property here in WV is priceless I wouldn't trade it for anything.
I think this is a bad precedent and the judge is going way above and beyond on this. But apparently you don't understand what the crime was here. Its not just saying his building is worth $1B in a negotiation to sell it, find a market rate through negotiation, and then pay taxes on his profit.Using simple logic here...who "undervalues" anything they're trying to sell? I recently had a 2011 Explorer that was my Wife's truck in pristine condition but had 178,000 miles on it. I didn't want to give it away so I sold it. KBB (Kelly Blue Book) on it was slightly over 3K, but I had it on the market at 4500.00. It was a nice 4 wheel drive Limited, loaded with sunroof, heated leather seats, automatic load leveling, trailer package...the works. I had a guy offer me 4800.00 for it (after several other offers meeting my asking price)
Did I tell him it was only worth only 3K? No... I sold it to him @ 4800.00.
So Trump overvalues his real estate holdings? He can price it at whatever he thinks the market will bear, unless someone pays his asking price it doesn't mean didly squat. Leftists are so desperate. Instead of coming up with a plan to control our open border and stop this illegal invasion, they're worried what Trump thinks his various property holdings in decaying New York City are worth?
I wouldn't buy real estate up there if they were giving it away!
He's not lying as part of a negotiation to sell his property. In that case its buyer beware. He's accused of defrauding the IRS and fraudulently obtaining loans. Those are two completely different things.Asking a modern day Democrat to understand any part of that would be like asking dogs to stop sniffing each others butt.
Good job on the explorer. Trump's property was/is worth what someone is willing to pay for it . If Trump felt it was worth a billion than it's worth a billion.
My property here in WV is priceless I wouldn't trade it for anything.
I agree with most of this, but in the case where specific loans are being sought and property is being offered as collateral to obtain the loans, that's where you typically bring in independent property appraisals and look at tax assessments records so the lender can have a clear picture of the market to determine the actual value of the property. You don't use some Judge who just arbitrarily decides what some property is worth, because that's not based on any true market analysis.I think this is a bad precedent and the judge is going way above and beyond on this. But apparently you don't understand what the crime was here. Its not just saying his building is worth $1B in a negotiation to sell it, find a market rate through negotiation, and then pay taxes on his profit.
He's overvaluing his assets in order to get OUT of paying taxes, and to fraudulently obtain loans. Of course if your 10k square foot apartment is valued between $30M-$50M (or whatever) and you claim its $50M or even $70m that's one thing. To lie on a legal document saying its actually 30k sq ft and worth 10x what its really worth, that is an easily proven lie. First, the square footage is documented and easily verified. Second, you can't just come up with a number out of thin air that everyone knows is a lie and say you "over valued" it. Maybe you could if there were no damages, but if its to knowingly get out of paying taxes, then its a crime.
He should certainly have to pay whatever back taxes he owes along with penalties and interest, but they shouldn't be taking away his ability to conduct business in the state, which is in essence what they are trying to do.
If the properties weren't worth what he was attempting to borrow, how was he "fraudulently" obtaining the loans?He's overvaluing his assets in order to get OUT of paying taxes, and to fraudulently obtain loans.
Why hasn't the IRS audited him for this, and either prosecuted him for it, or demanded whatever back taxes he owed? Why did it take all this time for the IRS to discover he owed taxes on assets he wasn't claiming? Why didn't the IRS prosecute this case if it's a violation of his tax obligations? If he paid taxes on what the property was worth, where's the fraud? If the loans against the value of the property were obtained under false pretenses, why didn't the lender raise a red flag or accuse him of fraudulently obtaining the loans, or demand reimbursement for their loss?He's accused of defrauding the IRS and fraudulently obtaining loans.
Lmao! Why don’t you fvcktards just give up with this nonsense. The American people see through this sham. Either beat him fair and square in the election or STFU. If the American people want Trump as POTUS, then take a seat and wait until 2028.UUUUUUGE loss for Trump.
So much losing.
Lmao! Why don’t you fvcktards just give up with this nonsense. The American people see through this sham. Either beat him fair and square in the election or STFU. If the American people want Trump as POTUS, then take a seat and wait until 2028.
His property values were inflated when he was obtaining loans, and they were artificially low when calculating taxes. Those are 2 different processes. 1) When calculating his taxes, he artificially lowers the value of the property to say he's operating at a loss...to the point many years he didn't pay any taxes. 2) When obtaining a loan, he inflates the value of the property, which inflates his net worth, which allows him to qualify for loans he normally might not have been able to. All of the documents you need to sign in that process require an attestation that you are providing accurate information. Loans in the hundreds of millions would probably require audited financials, which means you can't just say "I value it as this." Its not an art. You take comps of other buildings, homes, etc and its pretty straightfoward. They are saying his evaluations were not.If the properties weren't worth what he was attempting to borrow, how was he "fraudulently" obtaining the loans?
Whatever taxes he owed on them would be based on assed valuations, not what he claims the properties were worth.
Why hasn't the IRS audited him for this, and either prosecuted him for it, or demanded whatever back taxes he owed? Why did it take all this time for the IRS to discover he owed taxes on assets he wasn't claiming? Why didn't the IRS prosecute this case if it's a violation of his tax obligations? If he paid taxes on what the property was worth, where's the fraud? If the loans against the value of the property were obtained under false pretenses, why didn't the lender raise a red flag or accuse him of fraudulently obtaining the loans, or demand reimbursement for their loss?
In auto financing, if a borrower makes false statements about their assets or income, they either don't get the loan or if they get the loan and then don't pay it all back, all of their liquid assets (including income and/or the vehicle) are legally recoverable by the lender. As far as I can tell, Trump's lenders weren't trying to recover his properties or secure missed payments from him, or even cite him for fraud on undervalued properties. No one tried to seize his properties back as collateral or taxes owed to them. Not as far as I can see. You see it differently? If so how?
This is just another smear disguised as a scam Trump was alleged to be running but it's not supported by how most lenders, tax assessors or even the IRS operates!
If the properties were being used as collateral (which apparently they were) no lender would make the loans without verifying their true market value. Trump can't "inflate" values on his own simply by stating it, something like that has to be verified by an independent appraisal which is standard procedure for most equity financed loans. Besides, property tax assessments are not done by the individual property owners, they're assessed by the local jurisdictions who eventually collect the taxes.His property values were inflated when he was obtaining loans, and they were artificially low when calculating taxes.
Again, the IRS would have probably questioned this, or at the very least asked him to provide the documentation of the loss. I actually don't blame him for taking whatever deductions that were legally available to claim a loss to lower his taxes. The problem comes if his deductions were illegal? I don't see where the IRS has charged him with filing false returns, or taking illegal deductions.When calculating his taxes, he artificially lowers the value of the property to say he's operating at a loss...to the point many years he didn't pay any taxes.
Again, no responsible lender protecting their investor's assets would make loans without verifying the income/asset statements of a borrower. (ie: Trump) Chances are he already had established lender(s) with revolving lines of credit he could access based on his holdings or overall net worth, so they may not have had any problems with him overvaluing some properties in his portfolio, and undervaluing others. If the lender(s) weren't complaining about fraud or default, and were getting repaid in full... where exactly was the deceit?When obtaining a loan, he inflates the value of the property, which inflates his net worth, which allows him to qualify for loans he normally might not have been able to.
Unless they had some independent analysis to show Trump was claiming losses no one else in the market was claiming, or that his properties were priced way beyond what similar properties in that market were worth, I can't see what he's done wrong? If he owed taxes and didn't pay them, that's another story. However he's not charged with not paying taxes, he's charged with paying less than this Judge or Prosecutor thinks he should have based on what they think his properties were worth. That's not only unsupportable based on their charges, but it's probably legal malpractice since neither that Judge nor the Prosecutor are real estate experts. That's not their call to make. The IRS hasn't even made that call! If he doesn't legally owe any taxes on the established value of those properties, this is nothing but more Lawfare and just another giant scam to smear him and keep him from winning back the White House.You take comps of other buildings, homes, etc and its pretty straightforward. They are saying his evaluations were not.
UUUUUUGE loss for Trump.
So much losing.
Regardless the judge determined he did it. So, doesn't matter what anyone else thinks.If the properties were being used as collateral (which apparently they were) no lender would make the loans without verifying their true market value. Trump can't "inflate" values on his own simply by stating it, something like that has to be verified by an independent appraisal which is standard procedure for most equity financed loans. Besides, property tax assessments are not done by the individual property owners, they're assessed by the local jurisdictions who eventually collect the taxes.
Again, the IRS would have probably questioned this, or at the very least asked him to provide the documentation of the loss. I actually don't blame him for taking whatever deductions that were legally available to claim a loss to lower his taxes. The problem comes if his deductions were illegal? I don't see where the IRS has charged him with filing false returns, or taking illegal deductions.
Again, no responsible lender protecting their investor's assets would make loans without verifying the income/asset statements of a borrower. (ie: Trump) Chances are he already had established lender(s) with revolving lines of credit he could access based on his holdings or overall net worth, so they may not have had any problems with him overvaluing some properties in his portfolio, and undervaluing others. If the lender(s) weren't complaining about fraud or default, and were getting repaid in full... where exactly was the deceit?
Unless they had some independent analysis to show Trump was claiming losses no one else in the market was claiming, or that his properties were priced way beyond what similar properties in that market were worth, I can't see what he's done wrong? If he owed taxes and didn't pay them, that's another story. However he's not charged with not paying taxes, he's charged with paying less than this Judge or Prosecutor thinks he should have based on what they think his properties were worth. That's not only unsupportable based on their charges, but it's probably legal malpractice since neither that Judge nor the Prosecutor are real estate experts. That's not their call to make. The IRS hasn't even made that call! If he doesn't legally owe any taxes on the established value of those properties, this is nothing but more Lawfare and just another giant scam to smear him and keep him from winning back the White House.
Won't work. Most folks are already past it and ignoring it. Trump doesn't have to do business in New York State, it's a lousy business climate anyway.
The Judge had no expertise to determine if the taxes legally owed on those properties were too low. He's only asked to rule on the legality of the taxes, nothing was illegal if all taxes legally assessed were paid. It will and should be appealed and probably will be overturned, especially since the ruling was made without input from an impartial jury!Regardless the judge determined he did it. So, doesn't matter what anyone else thinks.
And since it looks like Hunter and probably Joe were also up to no good, they should (Hunter definitely is) be investigated too.
your parents committed fraud on the human raceUUUUUUGE loss for Trump.
So much losing.