Made the trolls and low information fans look dumber than they actual are on our idiot board.
CMP 28
YDS 532
CMP% 54.9
LNG 64
TD 5
CMP 28
YDS 532
CMP% 54.9
LNG 64
TD 5
Made the trolls and low information fans look dumber than they actual are on our idiot board.
![]()
CMP 28
YDS 532
CMP% 54.9
LNG 64
TD 5
I see the same facts. I see he same record. I draw quite different conclusions. Quite significant within the facts is that the 4 straight losses came at the hands of exceptionally good teams playing their best ball with a healthy lineup of high quality performers. I have all trust that had these same lineups been present for the games in December/January the outcomes would have made the conference look as powerful as it was whern the season started. Baylor played their bowl with both hands tied behind their backs and, with superb coaching and player performance, throttled UNC. TCU played without their superman and showed, with the marvelous comeback, that they are stocked with superb talent. We should have beaten both Oklahoma State and Kansas State. I am confident we would have done so had we played them in a bowl game. Your assessment neglects that our pass receivers were GREEN early in the season. Very GREEN. They are just beginning to become college level receivers--nearly ALL of them!. We had experience at RB , and Dana tried to alter the thrust of the team to take advantage of this fact until the receiving corps became operational.The early games were too early for any of this to make much of a difference against the best competition playing at a high level. Later on the run game showed a little more life. Now, in the bowl we saw that the receivers are beginning to look much better. You state that "Skyler Howard is barely adequate as a Power 5 QB". I seriously doubt you have any where near the requisite credentials to authenticate such a conclusion. I believe it is 'your opinion', and I fail to be impressed with your super inflated egoHe almost made us forget the fact that the offense he runs sucked against good teams, he throws the ball to the other team, he misses wide open receivers, and he didn't beat a single power 5 team with a winning record! But hey that one game was awesome! Funny how the same "high information fans" and Danapologists want to look at the whole season when the team is in the midst of the Dana Dip, But when it supports your one sided view we can throw out any information that doesn't support your argument.
Skyler Howard is barely adequate as a Power 5 QB. And until the level of our QB improves I look for more of the seasons we have had under Dana. Where our winning seasons are based more on the fact that our schedule has a bunch of crappy teams that we beat and enough top rated teams for the "high information fans" to hide behind when we get out tails kicked! We were great under Rich. We started a slide under Stew. Under Dana we finished the slide and have flatlined at mediocre. The sample size is large enough to know what we have now. And that's a mediocre coach of a mediocre team. Could things be worse? Yes! Could they be better? Certainly! That's the reason the fan base has mixed emotion and the definition of mediocre.
LMAO. Maybe they didn't have a winning record because they lost to WVU. See how that works. The trolls and low information fans have had a rough few days and have never looked dumber than they do right now. Enjoying every moment of it.
532 yards!
I see the same facts. I see he same record. I draw quite different conclusions. Quite significant within the facts is that the 4 straight losses came at the hands of exceptionally good teams playing their best ball with a healthy lineup of high quality performers. I have all trust that had these same lineups been present for the games in December/January the outcomes would have made the conference look as powerful as it was whern the season started. Baylor played their bowl with both hands tied behind their backs and, with superb coaching and player performance, throttled UNC. TCU played without their superman and showed, with the marvelous comeback, that they are stocked with superb talent. We should have beaten both Oklahoma State and Kansas State. I am confident we would have done so had we played them in a bowl game. Your assessment neglects that our pass receivers were GREEN early in the season. Very GREEN. They are just beginning to become college level receivers--nearly ALL of them!. We had experience at RB , and Dana tried to alter the thrust of the team to take advantage of this fact until the receiving corps became operational.The early games were too early for any of this to make much of a difference against the best competition playing at a high level. Later on the run game showed a little more life. Now, in the bowl we saw that the receivers are beginning to look much better. You state that "Skyler Howard is barely adequate as a Power 5 QB". I seriously doubt you have any where near the requisite credentials to authenticate such a conclusion. I believe it is 'your opinion', and I fail to be impressed with your super inflated ego
.
I see the same facts. I see he same record. I draw quite different conclusions. Quite significant within the facts is that the 4 straight losses came at the hands of exceptionally good teams playing their best ball with a healthy lineup of high quality performers. I have all trust that had these same lineups been present for the games in December/January the outcomes would have made the conference look as powerful as it was whern the season started. Baylor played their bowl with both hands tied behind their backs and, with superb coaching and player performance, throttled UNC. TCU played without their superman and showed, with the marvelous comeback, that they are stocked with superb talent. We should have beaten both Oklahoma State and Kansas State. I am confident we would have done so had we played them in a bowl game. Your assessment neglects that our pass receivers were GREEN early in the season. Very GREEN. They are just beginning to become college level receivers--nearly ALL of them!. We had experience at RB , and Dana tried to alter the thrust of the team to take advantage of this fact until the receiving corps became operational.The early games were too early for any of this to make much of a difference against the best competition playing at a high level. Later on the run game showed a little more life. Now, in the bowl we saw that the receivers are beginning to look much better. You state that "Skyler Howard is barely adequate as a Power 5 QB". I seriously doubt you have any where near the requisite credentials to authenticate such a conclusion. I believe it is 'your opinion', and I fail to be impressed with your super inflated ego
.