The mRNA not-vaccine
- Thread starter Brushy Bill
- Start date
KAT HOOKER on Gab: '🔥 👇 💥 GOT TO HEAR IT! THEY ARE PUTTING HIV IN T…'
KAT HOOKER on Gab: '🔥 👇 💥 GOT TO HEAR IT! THEY ARE PUTTING HIV IN THE JABS! 💥 👇 🔥'
If all this is 100% true , then those of us who haven't taken the jab should be in pretty good shape by 2024 ?
Dr Mike Yeadon Calibration Of a Killing Weapon
Former Pfizer VP of RRD, explains the scientific data exposing the reason for large variation range of Injuries & Deaths from the experimental injections. There is clear evidence that the Batch conten
rumble.com
“I’m going to speak briefly about the toxicity of the Covid vaccines, in particular, of the mRNA vaccines. This is really a technology designed to poison people. That is my considered opinion as a medical doctor working in biochemistry; teaching pharmacology and toxicology. They have two components. One is the messenger RNA, which contains the blueprint, in this case, for the spike protein that occurs normally on the surface of the virus particles. And the idea is to sneak this messenger RNA into our own body cells in order to have them make the actual protein to which the immune systems respond.
The second component is the lipid nanoparticles, lipid fat like molecules, that encase the messenger RNA. And they serve two purposes. One is to protect the messenger RNA while it is in transport and, secondly, also to help it enter the body cells. There are several different components and one of them is so-called cationic, or electrically positively charged lipid that is known to be quite toxic.
They tend to, once they are inside the cell, disrupt the mitochondrial respiration. We have to assume that just as with radiation, there is a total dose limit, total lifetime dose limit that you can survive. What that means is the total lifetime dose of these messenger RNA vaccines that you can tolerate before you die is limited. We don’t know the exact amount because there is simply not enough experimental data.
It’s actually one of the great scandals of these vaccines that no proper toxicity studies have been carried out before these were rolled out and applied worldwide to the population. In principle, we can be quite certain that the total dose of these vaccines that you can tolerate before you die limited. Whether that’s ten shots or twenty shots or eight shots, nobody knows. So this is really a technology designed to poison people.”
Page not found
adversereactionreport.com
What happens to those billions of NanoParticles you've become host to?
Vaccine Safety Myth - Two Fundamental Mechanisms that Explain Serious Adverse Effects Post-Vaccination
covidmythbuster.substack.com
If all this is true then in a couple years should be able to buy a cheap used car .
Taiwan: Birth Rate Dropped -27.66% in June 2022!!!
Invasion? We do not need no stinking invasion
igorchudov.substack.com
The "safe and effective" narrative is falling apart
Here is my list of over 50 leading indicators that the momentum is moving in our favor. I'd be surprised if the narrative doesn't fall apart soon. It's now unravelling quickly in the UK.
stevekirsch.substack.com
Another conspiracy theory true. Seriously libs, why should we have any trust in our government at this time?
Inflation and irregular menstrual cycles are infrastructure or something like that.
These Leftists think that by just changing the wording or the language or the definition of something, they can change what it actually is. It's almost as if they think they can control reality itself simply by how we choose to define it.
Arrogance illustrated.
Arrogance illustrated.
Last edited:
The “Lincoln Law” came about because during a national emergency, specifically the Civil War, merchants screwed the government — and the people. It was the people who died, yet the government agencies failed to go after the parties who did the screwing and hold them accountable.
We now know this as the “False Claims” act, and it was passed so that when that sort of corruption occurs someone, in this case anyone who has specific knowledge, can bring the suit on behalf of the government and, if they are correct and win they get a piece of the recovered money. Since government contracts are usually for ridiculously large amounts of money by ordinary human standards this is a pretty-good incentive for anyone who has knowledge of such a thing to bring the suit — if you expose an actual fraud and win you’re typically set for life.
It is alleged that the Pfizer jibby-jab trials were frauds. I’ve pointed out several indicators that made clear they were utterly unreliable to provide scientific evidence of both safety and fitness for purpose. This suit was filed alleging that this wasn’t just poor design: The allegation is that the conduct and operation of the trials themselves was fraudulent, said fraud was material and it induced the government to issue EUAs and buy 100 million doses of the jabs. It also alleges that the purpose of the solicitation in the first place was “military readiness”.
Pfizer and the other firms involved filed a motion to dismiss.
The basis of their attempt to dismiss the claim is this:
Respondents seek dismissal without discovery, amendment, or trial. Their fundamental premise: even if honestly reported data showed their product caused more illness than it cured, inflicted more injury than it prevented, and took more lives than it saved, America’s military would still have given them billions of dollars and mandated it be injected into America’s military. Respondents claim fraudulent certifications, false statements, doctored data, contaminated clinical trials, and firing of whistleblowers can be ignored based on the theory that they contracted their way around the fraud.
Think about that last sentence.
The accused did not deny that fraud took place.
Instead they argue that fraud in the procurement, including fraud that harmed or killed the public and members of the military, is not actionable because the government and the parties it solicited to provide the jabs agreed that fraud was ok.
We now know this as the “False Claims” act, and it was passed so that when that sort of corruption occurs someone, in this case anyone who has specific knowledge, can bring the suit on behalf of the government and, if they are correct and win they get a piece of the recovered money. Since government contracts are usually for ridiculously large amounts of money by ordinary human standards this is a pretty-good incentive for anyone who has knowledge of such a thing to bring the suit — if you expose an actual fraud and win you’re typically set for life.
It is alleged that the Pfizer jibby-jab trials were frauds. I’ve pointed out several indicators that made clear they were utterly unreliable to provide scientific evidence of both safety and fitness for purpose. This suit was filed alleging that this wasn’t just poor design: The allegation is that the conduct and operation of the trials themselves was fraudulent, said fraud was material and it induced the government to issue EUAs and buy 100 million doses of the jabs. It also alleges that the purpose of the solicitation in the first place was “military readiness”.
Pfizer and the other firms involved filed a motion to dismiss.
The basis of their attempt to dismiss the claim is this:
Respondents seek dismissal without discovery, amendment, or trial. Their fundamental premise: even if honestly reported data showed their product caused more illness than it cured, inflicted more injury than it prevented, and took more lives than it saved, America’s military would still have given them billions of dollars and mandated it be injected into America’s military. Respondents claim fraudulent certifications, false statements, doctored data, contaminated clinical trials, and firing of whistleblowers can be ignored based on the theory that they contracted their way around the fraud.
Think about that last sentence.
The accused did not deny that fraud took place.
Instead they argue that fraud in the procurement, including fraud that harmed or killed the public and members of the military, is not actionable because the government and the parties it solicited to provide the jabs agreed that fraud was ok.
Market-Ticker-Nad - The Market Ticker
MarketTicker Forums - Discussions About Investing
market-ticker.org
Similar threads
