ADVERTISEMENT

Terhan and Washington seem to differ on what is and what

EERs 3:16

Heisman Winner
Oct 17, 2001
73,157
1,087
508
is not in that treaty. Shouldn't we have more clarification before it goes to Congress?
 
Originally posted by EERs 3:16:
is not in that treaty. Shouldn't we have more clarification before it goes to Congress?
Absolutely - starting with an actual agreement instead of "a framework." The first "landmark nuclear deal" between Iran and the P5+1 was announced almost two years ago, and yet no deal has been finalized yet. Rouhani insists that this latest version of the deal won't be accepted by Iran unless it includes immediate lifting of sanctions ... which the P5+1 won't agree to, so there's nothing to be sent to Congress.
 
We all know what happens to Obama's lines in the sand.

Iran is playing these fools and will not only get the sanctions lifted, but all the Lady Gaga tracks from Apple that they want.
DOOOOOOOOOMED!!!!!!
This post was edited on 4/10 10:34 AM by Wolf J. Flywheel
 
Re: We all know what happens to Obama's lines in the sand.

Originally posted by Wolf J. Flywheel:
Iran is playing these fools and will not only get the sanctions lifted, but all the Lady Gaga tracks from Apple that they want.This post was edited on 4/10 10:34 AM by Wolf J. Flywheel[/I]
Lady Gaga? That would teach them not to mess with the U.S.
laugh.r191677.gif
 
I can't name you more than 5-6 current recording "artists".

Amazing how I now sound like my uncles and grandparents when I was growing up.

At least the 80's and 90's still had musicians.

'Music' now truly is terrible.
 
Agreement, not treaty

Don't use that word. That means the Senate would have to ratify it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT