Does it seem to others that, for several decades, WVU has had numerous athletes who have a very good year and ride that flash o=of success off into the sunset of pro sports? we have seen numerous kids skip their final year (s) of eligibility because of the success in a given year and the 'encouragement' of family and associates to 'grab the money'. when have we ever had a star return for another year after having a year of decent success? Is this, possibly, the outcome of coaching up kids who arrive as less than absolute guarantees of success (the 5 star 'can't miss' kid and, to a degree, the lower 4 star)? Makes me wonder if these kids lack deep seated confidence and wonder if they can continue at the high level. Maybe better to grab the money while it is being offered or have all discover that he really is a more middle of the road talent than elite. Could it be the opposite--a kid who ego runs amuck and he feels he is among the World Beaters and is has nothing further to prove or gain from continuing with college. In all cases we have a kid who leaves without a guarantee for the future--no degree. How often have we seen the bubble burst either immediately (not drafted or not making a team) or after a couple years of less than stellar performance at the next level and no future planned? I know Smallwood had a very good year. Is he a back the pros will consider elite? Will he really achieve his NFL goals or be something considerably less? I hope it is the former. I hope the advice and 'guidance' received from family, friends, associates, etc. was in HIS best interests.
The manner in which some people.....like this individual.....attempt to hyper-analyze decisions like that of Smallwood (and Worley, and probably about 95% of other early Draft entrants) never fails to astonish me. I can't figure out why it's
so difficult to reconcile that the overwhelming majority.....of course, I can't prove how many that actually represents.....of kids who play elite college ball have had their sights focused
solely on the NFL since they were youngsters; and college ball was never intended as anything more than a means to that end.
For that reason, its critical to recognize that most of these kinds of kids didn't sign with their given schools because of any deep-seated love for the institution, or more importantly, any perceived need for a degree. In fact, I honestly think most fans fail to realize perhaps
the most valuable short-term "benefit" a decision to turn pro offers a kid; that is, he's no longer "burdened" with going to class.....something which never had
anything to do with their professional goals to begin with.
I myself also
never assume these kinds of decisions are made with any kind of real "guidance"; in fact, I suspect a fair percentage of the time those folks who claim to be "advising" are at least as obsessed as the kid himself......if not more so.....with the prospects of seeing a monthly NFL check with "their" kid's name on it. Try and convince me that Tyler Boyd's grandstanding mother hasn't already decided what color
her new Escalade is going to be.
In a vacuum, that 95% to which I referred above likely
are better advised to remain in school and finish their eligibility. And in a parallel vacuum, most of them would probably be
far better advised to spend more time focusing on earning their degree (during their 4 years) than than how many yards for which they rush (or how many INT's they make). But that just ain't the way the world works for the overwhelmingly-greatest percentage of grant-in-aid athletes playing in revenue sports in the 21st century (or late 20th century, for that matter).