Its a nice matchup of two state teams for the taxpayers, politicians, sportsfans, etc. of the state. It provides a nice contest for the capital city which otherwise can't provide a venue for the two major institutions of the state. Always on tv, sometimes on national tv which brings exposure to the state. People go, spend money, both teams get exposure (and undoubtedly money). No matter the records, this has at times been competitive and no matter the records it hasn't hurt the post season opportunities of anyone as evidenced by WVU's runs into the NCAA tournament such as last years despite playing a very down MU team.
There are no reasons to not play the game.
Now my retort.............. WVU is not in the business of considering what is best for Marshall University, so that whole "good exposure for both teams" is moot. Not our problem.... and the "exposure" argument for WVU Basketball is laughable as well, as our very next home game after the Classic ---- EKU ---- was ALSO televised on the same station, ESPNU....... Just like any replacement game for the Classic would as well, or would be on Root...... the usual Go-To for the Classic. TV Coverage is a BS argument
"It's a nice matchup"................... Bull shit. That's a BS, sunshine and rainbows opinion. Reality says it's a top 25 program playing an RPI 200+ team away from their home court............... something that DOESN'T HAPPEN in college basketball anywhere else but WV.......... because, well, WV doesn't do anything correctly.
"It provides a nice contest for the Capital City" ............ Huggins brought a great contest to the Capital City in November in the form of top 100 program James Madison........ and the locals failed to show up. Huggs wanted to bring the UVA series to Charleston, but after the poor showing of JMU, and last season's game with VMI........ that isn't happening. By the attendance numbers, Charleston doesn't DESERVE it.
"People Go, Spend Money".............. People go, spend money at home games too, and we don't have to split the take with an undeserving opponent............ Honestly. Don't even approach the financial side of this debate because your stance will get buried......... Just ignore that money exists, like Hamrick is doing.
"It hasn't hurt the postseason" ............ anytime WVU has lost to MU in the past..... back when we had a coach who would lose to them with regularity.......... the game was ALWAYS held as a "Bad Loss" in the eyes of the committee.
"As evidenced by WVU's runs"......... so now we're giving credit to the game for preparing WVU for the post season?
Our Athletic Department is self-sustaining.................. what the tax payers "want"........ which most don't want this game............ doesn't factor into what our AD does............ if we were talking computer labs, new dorms, or something on the academic side? Sure........ but our AD doesn't lean on tax dollars (unlike the other side of the equation in this game)...
It's a walfare mentality to say "the people of WV deserve this"..........
College athletics exist for one reason and one reason ONLY......... production of revenue. WVU must do what is best for WVU's bottom line. Period.