ADVERTISEMENT

Schumer blocks Republicans' school safety bill days after mass shooting...

30CAT

Heisman Winner
Gold Member
May 29, 2001
51,452
12,149
708
Williamstown, WV
The dolt wants our guns. He wants that to be the only solution. Give us your second amendment rights or nothing.

Leftists are destroying our country

LINK: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., on Wednesday blocked a school safety bill that has Republicans crying foul.

After the horrific mass shooting at a Uvalde, Texas, elementary school that killed 19 children and two teachers, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., asked for the Luke and Alex School Safety Act to be passed by unanimous consent.

The bill, named after Parkland, Florida, shooting victims Luke Hoyer and Alex Schachter, would require the Department of Homeland Security to establish a "Federal Clearinghouse on School Safety Best Practices" for use by state and local educational and law-enforcement agencies, institutions of higher education, health professionals, and the public. And it would require DHS to "collect clearinghouse data analytics, user feedback on the implementation of best practices and recommendations identified by the clearinghouse, and any evaluations conducted on these best practices and recommendations."

The clearinghouse, which is already available at SchoolSafety.gov, would be codified into law with the bill’s passage.

Schumer objected to Johnson’s request, claiming on Twitter that the bill "could see more guns in schools."

"The truth: There were officers at the school in Texas," Schumer tweeted. "The shooter got past them. We need real solutions—We will vote on gun legislation starting with the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act."

On the Senate floor, Schumer said the legislation could be considered if Republicans agree to debate on the domestic terrorism bill. Johnson responded that it’s "a sad day for the United States Senate," the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.

Johnson later tweeted: "Not surprising that the Democrat leader would lie about the bill he blocked that parents of Parkland victims have been trying to pass for years. Dems aren’t looking for solutions, they want wedge issues that they hope will keep them in power. Sick."

Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., who co-sponsored the bill, blasted Schumer as "a liar and a hack."

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., who also co-sponsored the bill, tweeted: "The truth: Schumer blocked a bipartisan bill the makes the school safety clearinghouse schoolsafety.gov permanent because radical left wing activists oppose it."

Meanwhile, the Senate is set to vote Thursday on whether to advance the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act, which passed the House last week after the Buffalo mass shooting that killed 10 people.

That bill would require the domestic terrorism components of the DHS, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to jointly report on domestic terrorism, as well as create "an interagency task force to analyze and combat white supremacist and neo-Nazi infiltration of the uniformed services and federal law enforcement agencies."
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVUALLEN
Dont yall know if they take guns criminals will stop breaking our laws. We need to put our trust in the government to protect us above themselves....lmao
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30CAT
Dont yall know if they take guns criminals will stop breaking our laws. We need to put our trust in the government to protect us above themselves....lmao
No, but it would help curtail a lot of crime, especially violent crime. There is a reason the vast majority of murders and robberies involve firearms.

Stop with the all or none game. That is the same nonsense the left uses to argue against the wall at the southern border. Of course people will still come across if the wall is built, but it will be a lot harder and deter a lot of people from trying. People will still cross, but the number will drastically fall.

No law regarding any topic will 100% eliminate the problem. In a free society the laws aren't supposed to work that way.
 
No, but it would help curtail a lot of crime, especially violent crime. There is a reason the vast majority of murders and robberies involve firearms.

Stop with the all or none game. That is the same nonsense the left uses to argue against the wall at the southern border. Of course people will still come across if the wall is built, but it will be a lot harder and deter a lot of people from trying. People will still cross, but the number will drastically fall.

No law regarding any topic will 100% eliminate the problem. In a free society the laws aren't supposed to work that way.
I’m fine with the crime to keep my access to firearms. Allow me to handle the crime that is presented to me free of malicious prosecution and we’re all good.
 
No, but it would help curtail a lot of crime, especially violent crime. There is a reason the vast majority of murders and robberies involve firearms.

Stop with the all or none game. That is the same nonsense the left uses to argue against the wall at the southern border. Of course people will still come across if the wall is built, but it will be a lot harder and deter a lot of people from trying. People will still cross, but the number will drastically fall.

No law regarding any topic will 100% eliminate the problem. In a free society the laws aren't supposed to work that way.
No sir . It is a all or nothing. I'm not giving up my second amendment.
Before you start puking your shit about the shutdown & mandatory vacation.... I did lose my job because I wouldn't get the jab . & yes I am fighting it legally.
 
No sir . It is a all or nothing. I'm not giving up my second amendment.
Before you start puking your shit about the shutdown & mandatory vacation.... I did lose my job because I wouldn't get the jab . & yes I am fighting it legally.
i don’t know what Covid has to do with any of this. And I never suggested you give up your second amendment right.

good lord
 
ADVERTISEMENT