Ruth Bader Ginsberg....Do not replace her until after the election

[30CAT]

Whomever wins the election, is the one who decides her replacement. That's the way it was played under Obama.

Granted, I would love nothing more than Trump nominating a replacement, but as under Obama, not during an election year.

Can't be hypocritical.

 

[dedhoops24]

Whomever wins the election, is the one who decides her replacement. That's the way it was played under Obama.

Granted, I would love nothing more than Trump nominating a replacement, but as under Obama, not during an election year.

Can't be hypocritical.

I commend you for this statement, it is the honorable play. With that said, Trump will nominate and Mitch will pull a vote.......

 

[MountainDoc1]

Elections are every 4 or 6 years. Supreme court nominees are for a lifetime.

 

[Airport]

Whomever wins the election, is the one who decides her replacement. That's the way it was played under Obama.

Granted, I would love nothing more than Trump nominating a replacement, but as under Obama, not during an election year.

Can't be hypocritical.

Not since the late 1800's had the senate approved a candidate of the opposing party who held the Presidency. Little different. Probably need to have 9 in case the dems refuse to concede.

 

[Archetype XLIV]

I commend you for this statement, it is the honorable play. With that said, Trump will nominate and Mitch will pull a vote.......

 

[Gunny46]

Whomever wins the election, is the one who decides her replacement. That's the way it was played under Obama.

Granted, I would love nothing more than Trump nominating a replacement, but as under Obama, not during an election year.

Can't be hypocritical.

The Democrats would replace her next week if they could.

 

[30CAT]

I commend you for this statement, it is the honorable play. With that said, Trump will nominate and Mitch will pull a vote.......

I won't lie. That would make me happy, but I disagree with allowing Trump to choose. It would be hypocritical. It would made leftists happy if Obama would've named a nominee.

Turnabout is fair play. Let's get the election over with and let the winning party select her replacement. I cringe at the thought of who Pedo-Joe would select, but I'm sure the thought was mutual in 2016 from the left.

Let's not be hypocritical.

 

[dedhoops24]

And then he will get crushed in a landslide and the GOP will lose the Senate.......

 

[Airport]

And then he will get crushed in a landslide and the GOP will lose the Senate.......

doubtful

 

[dedhoops24]

I won't lie. That would make me happy, but I disagree with allowing Trump to choose. It would be hypocritical. It would made leftists happy if Obama would've named a nominee.

Turnabout is fair play. Let's get the election over with and let the winning party select her replacement. I cringe at the thought of who Pedo-Joe would select, but I'm sure the thought was mutual in 2016 from the left.

Let's not be hypocritical.

I hope that Trump and Mitch do it.....it will be the nails in their literal coffins.....

 

[dedhoops24]

doubtful

Guaranteed for Trump. Senate, probable.

 

[30CAT]

I hope that Trump and Mitch do it.....it will be the nails in their literal coffins.....

Select a Supreme Court justice? That would be awesome! That said, I'm just saying I can see the hypocrisy.

 

[Gunny46]

 

[Airport]

Guaranteed for Trump. Senate, probable.

npt probable. Alabama goes back to Repubs, Doubtful that every close race goes against the incumbent.

 

[Gunny46]

Select a Supreme Court justice? That would be awesome! That said, I'm just saying I can see the hypocrisy.

Who gives a shit. The new Democrats are the most hypocritical people ever.

 

[dedhoops24]

Select a Supreme Court justice? That would be awesome! That said, I'm just saying I can see the hypocrisy.

Yes. This is the trade off for the GOP. They control SCOTUS for near term while losing control of the WH and Senate.....I’m good with that as long as the GOP burns and rebuilds....

 

[oceantide83]

I won't lie. That would make me happy, but I disagree with allowing Trump to choose. It would be hypocritical. It would made leftists happy if Obama would've named a nominee.

Turnabout is fair play. Let's get the election over with and let the winning party select her replacement. I cringe at the thought of who Pedo-Joe would select, but I'm sure the thought was mutual in 2016 from the left.

Let's not be hypocritical.

There is nothing hypocritical about following the constitution and protecting this country from foreign AND domestic enemies. The left has been completely and utterly exposed as an enemy of this country.

 

[Airport]

Select a Supreme Court justice? That would be awesome! That said, I'm just saying I can see the hypocrisy.

Brush up on history, it was the late 1800's when the opposing party approved the SC nominee of a lame President of the opposing party. The dems rewrote many of the rules, it's time to use them against them.

 

[dedhoops24]

npt probable. Alabama goes back to Repubs, Doubtful that every close race goes against the incumbent.

If they don’t push the vote, I would agree you, even with AL.....but.....they will do it and the rest is history......we can discuss it more after the history books are written on the 3rd....

 

[dave]

Whomever wins the election, is the one who decides her replacement. That's the way it was played under Obama.

Granted, I would love nothing more than Trump nominating a replacement, but as under Obama, not during an election year.

Can't be hypocritical.

Um. No.

 

[oceantide83]

Who gives a shit. Democrats are the most hypocritical people ever.

Exactly. Give them a taste of their own game.

 

[Airport]

Yes. This is the trade off for the GOP. They co trip SCOTUS for near term while losing control of the WH and Senate.....I’m good with that as long as the GOP burns and rebuilds....

Sounds like cities with liberal mayors only there's no businesses going back into those areas with the same type of crappy leadership

 

[Airport]

If they don’t push the vote, I would agree you, even with AL.....but.....they will do it and the rest is history......we can discuss it more after the history books are written on the 3rd....

Those who are going to support their choice will support them, those who don't, won't. It won't make a difference one way or the other.

 

[Airport]

View embedded media

We actually need 9 on the court in case the election goes into the crapper because of the crap that liberals are pulling in close states.

 

[atlkvb]

Whomever wins the election, is the one who decides her replacement. That's the way it was played under Obama.

Granted, I would love nothing more than Trump nominating a replacement, but as under Obama, not during an election year.

Can't be hypocritical.

I'd also prefer he wait until he is re-elected. Make the direction of the SUPCO a campaign issue. He has provided his list of potential nominees. Let Biden announce his list and let the voters decide who they'd rather have appointing the next two or three Justices and what type of Court they want as a result?

Agree 100%. I want to hear Leftists argue it's not about Abortion, and defend infanticide.

 

[WVU80ate]

Whomever wins the election, is the one who decides her replacement. That's the way it was played under Obama.

Granted, I would love nothing more than Trump nominating a replacement, but as under Obama, not during an election year.

Can't be hypocritical.

It’s not hypocritical. People need to learn about the powers of our government And learn history. The GOP controlled the senate under Obama at the time. Obama nominated his pick of garland. He didn’t wait. If the Democrats controlled the Senate, they would’ve picked Garland. They weren’t waiting, playing “fair” or being nice and understanding. They just didn’t have the power. Why would the GOP controlled Senate give up the opportunity to “play nice”? The Democrats have kept this country in turmoil for four years and attempted to destroy this president. **** their feelings. Trump needs to make the pick and the Senate needs to vote.

 

[Darrin class of 1989]

I won't lie. That would make me happy, but I disagree with allowing Trump to choose. It would be hypocritical. It would made leftists happy if Obama would've named a nominee.

Turnabout is fair play. Let's get the election over with and let the winning party select her replacement. I cringe at the thought of who Pedo-Joe would select, but I'm sure the thought was mutual in 2016 from the left.

Let's not be hypocritical.

Hypocritical?

The dems have already said they wish to pack the court if they win and remove the filibuster.

In short, take full control.

F em. This is for our country.

 

[atlkvb]

Who gives a shit. The new Democrats are the most hypocritical people ever.

It would be nice to use raw power and rub their noses in it...however i think the court is strengthened with a newly elected-by-landslide President empowered with a new Conservative Supreme Court. That's a voter mandate the Left has to respect. They will of course pout and stomp like little kids, and go about trashing and burning....however that is when the new President backed the DOJ starts locking up the paid anarchists.

Appeals for violations of their "free speech destruction" rights will be met with a Conservative Supreme court's deaf ears when it comes to upholding the rule of Law.

 

[JWG66]

Whomever wins the election, is the one who decides her replacement. That's the way it was played under Obama.

Granted, I would love nothing more than Trump nominating a replacement, but as under Obama, not during an election year.

Can't be hypocritical.

Sure we can. Too big of an opportunity to pass up. I know the left would do it too.

 

[Gunny46]

It’s not hypocritical. People need to learn about the powers of our government And learn history. The GOP controlled the senate under Obama at the time. Obama nominated his pick of garland. He didn’t wait. If the Democrats controlled the Senate, they would’ve picked Garland. They weren’t waiting, playing “fair” or being nice and understanding. They just didn’t have the power. Why would the GOP controlled Senate give up the opportunity to “play nice”? The Democrats have kept this country in turmoil for four years and attempted to destroy this president. **** their feelings. Trump needs to make the pick and the Senate needs to vote.

Hypocritical?

The dems have already said they wish to pack the court if they win and remove the filibuster.

In short, take full control.

F em. This is for our country.

Exactly.

 

[dedhoops24]

Those who are going to support their choice will support them, those who don't, won't. It won't make a difference one way or the other.

No gain for Trump, but the Indies and Libs who don’t want another social conservative on SCOTUS will care.....you’ll see from the surge.

 

[WVU82]

 

[wvu2007]

 

[wvu2007]

 

[Gunny46]

It would be nice to use raw power and rub their noses in it...however i think the court is strengthened with a newly elected-by-landslide President empowered with a new Conservative Supreme Court. That's a voter mandate the Left has to respect. They will of course pout and stomp like little kids, and go about trashing and burning....however that is when the new President backed the DOJ starts locking up the paid anarchists.

Appeals for violations of their "free speech destruction" rights will be met with a Conservative Supreme court's deaf ears when it comes to upholding the rule of Law.

The left isn't going to respect anything. They are currently make plans to burn shit down.

 

[WVU82]

 

[atlkvb]

It’s not hypocritical. People need to learn about the powers of our government And learn history. The GOP controlled the senate under Obama at the time. Obama nominated his pick of garland. He didn’t wait. If the Democrats controlled the Senate, they would’ve picked Garland. They weren’t waiting, playing “fair” or being nice and understanding. They just didn’t have the power. Why would the GOP controlled Senate give up the opportunity to “play nice”? The Democrats have kept this country in turmoil for four years and attempted to destroy this president. **** their feelings. Trump needs to make the pick and the Senate needs to vote.

Can't argue the logic here, but I don't like the politics. Let's make appointing the next Supreme Court Justice THE campaign issue over the future of our country. Free Speech rights, Freedom of assembly, Religious Freedoms, and 2nd amendment guarantees, Health care a choice and not a right, School choice vouchers and Prayer in schools, a Human Life Amendment, abuse of power in the FISA courts, US sovereignty over UN dictates, private property rights against eminent domain...it's all on the line and we should spell it all out for voters so they will have no ambiguity over how important this next election is.

Do we want Freedom, or Socialist control over our lives through an all powerful Leviathan? The Supreme court will get to decide that mandate...I want to hear from the voters first so we'll know what to expect when Trump wins.

Dismantle the Welfare State, drain the Swamp.

 

[dedhoops24]

The left isn't going to respect anything. They are currently make plans to burn shit down.

Just MAGA A. Hott Bologna Sandwhich

 

[Darrin class of 1989]

No gain for Trump, but the Indies and Libs who don’t want another social conservative on SCOTUS will care.....you’ll see from the surge.

And those that think RGB was evil incarcerated will surge for Trump.

 

[dedhoops24]

Can't argue the logic here, but I don't like the politics. Let's make appointing the next Supreme Court Justice THE campaign issue over the future of our country. Free Speech rights, Freedom of assembly, Religious Freedoms, and 2nd amendment guarantees, Health care a choice and not a right, School choice vouchers and Prayer in schools, a Human Life Amendment, abuse of power in the FISA courts, US sovereignty over UN dictates...it's all on the line and we should spell it all out for voters so they will have no ambiguity over how important this next election is.

Do we want Freedom, or Socialist control over our lives through an all powerful Leviathan? The Supreme court will get to decide that mandate...I want to hear from the voters first so we'll know what to expect when Trump wins.

Dismantle the Welfare State, drain the Swamp.

Your an intelligent man, you know what this means......but you can’t have your cake and eat it too.....