ADVERTISEMENT

Remember when Christian nationalist

sammyk

All-Conference
Oct 26, 2001
3,254
330
283
Targeted heavy metal saying that they were all worshiped satan. Hahaha. Weird just like today.
 
Targeted heavy metal saying that they were all worshiped satan. Hahaha. Weird just like today.
Why would you be bothered by that? You don't believe God exists, so by corollary you naturally don't believe Satan exists either. Correct? 🤔

So you've obviously got your panties all stained over two totally fictitious characters who you don't even think actually exist! Then you're laughably calling other folks weird? 🫤

giphy.webp
 
So unchristian.
Give me your best example of something or someone "Christian". You obviously have to know what's "Christian" in order to call something or someone "un" Christian, so let's hear your best example of who or what's "Christian?"

Got anything?

(btw, I'd think it's "totally weird" if you can't answer this)
 
Last edited:
Remember when sammyk said something intelligent? Me neither.
It's amazing to me how he and others on the Left are so quick to characterize or quantify what they think a Christian is or at least should be when absolutely none of them have any type of relationship with the author of Christianity himself! Zippo, Zilch, Nada!

So based on what expertise or empirical evidence do they make such bold yet uninformed statements? 🤔
 
Last edited:
@sammyk explaining to the board his lack of "Christian" expertise 😏
giphy.webp

OK @sammyk ...if you say so? 🫤
giphy.webp
 
Last edited:
tell the board about be christian.

you've probably masterbated a dozen times to REO Speedwagon's, "we can't fight this together" looking at Hillary.
I honestly would like to know how someone on the disbelieving Left knows what a "Christian" is or even does? How is this possible?
 
Hey, don't you dare turn me into one of your perverted sexual objects!
iu

Oh don't worry Hillary, that'll never happen! :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
no way Man!

My wife is my object (and concept) and she says yes, well most every time. My wife ain't that, for sure.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: atlkvb
I can't help it most men find me irresistible!
iu

If you believe that Hillary, I know some Whitewater real estate you might be interested in?
 
I broke her, but she never had anything anyway!
iu

Damn that's cold DJT!!!!!

Yeah I know, but what else can I say?
iu
 
Hey DJT, you broke creepy Joe too, and you're about to break that cacklin' Communist. Damn Bro!

This isn't hard atl, I just do what I do!
iu


I know that my man, but damn...have a little Mercy will 'ya?

Now you know why they want me dead
iu
 
Targeted heavy metal saying that they were all worshiped satan. Hahaha. Weird just like today.
You do know there are Christian heavy metal bands, right.

The only thing that lives in a box and never changes are liberals. You need to learn to think outside that box.

Remember this though, even Christ loves you and your leftist friends.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
You do know there are Christian heavy metal bands, right.

The only thing that lives in a box and never changes are liberals. You need to learn to think outside that box.

Remember this though, even Christ loves you and your leftist friends.
Jesus was a liberal
 
Jesus was a liberal
So you do believe in Christ.

Rather than work my way through a list of current issues and to suggest which choices would have the approval of Jesus Christ which in some cases could be presumptuous based on my own sin nature, biases, and limitations, I would like to take note of two major points that I see shining through from Scripture.

In Mark 12:13-17 Jesus faced a hostile audience eager to trip him up with a question that would expose him to scorn. As a teacher of all that is “true,” would he pay taxes to Caesar? He asked for a coin and contemplated what was engraved upon it. He saw the image of Caesar and answered, “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.” The immediate impact of the statement is that money comes from the system the government has set up and so we should pay the tribute that government then demands. But Jesus could accomplish that teaching by simply instructing followers to “render unto Caesar.” He goes further. “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.”

It seems to me that what Jesus says in the passage is that there is a place for the government. It has a rightful task and a duty it should fulfill. But even bringing God into consideration introduces a new dimension. The idea and reality of a Caesar is a grand and mighty thing, but as soon as we place God next to this earthly ruler, Caesar’s stature is immediately and radically put into perspective. Caesar will be like all the others. Earthly kingdoms will crumble and statues will erode. Their real significance is that they reflect often badly God’s greater rule. “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.”

In Matthew chapters 24 and 25, Jesus definitively declares his kingship. He will sit on a glorious throne, not as some local chieftain presiding over a tribe, or even as a great emperor of many lands, but rather as the King over all the nations with their people gathered before him. We cherish our democracies and our rights to have governments whose authority depends upon our consent. That is all very good as image-bearers relate to one another and we prevent any one sinful human being or small group from wielding too much power. But we must also remember not to think merely of Jesus as a friend or a brother. Make no mistake. He is a king. Not only is a he a king, he is the one true King.

The political impact of that reality is that as much as we become excited over the presidencies of people we should be far more attentive to the reality of the kingship of Jesus Christ. Christ’s rule may seem remote to us as cable news and social media obsess moment to moment and day to day over the rush of decisions, activities, and controversies that surround politicians, but we would be wiser to realize that his reign is like the heaven C. S. Lewis depicted in The Great Divorce. It is real. It is joyously, dangerously, thrillingly, devastatingly real. We are mere shadows before its light if we are separated from our true Lord.

The older I get, the more clear it is to me that the most significant thing I have to say about politics is that Jesus Christ is King. Those are the words that should be burning within us.

~ Hunter Baker
 
  • Love
Reactions: atlkvb
So you do believe in Christ.

Rather than work my way through a list of current issues and to suggest which choices would have the approval of Jesus Christ which in some cases could be presumptuous based on my own sin nature, biases, and limitations, I would like to take note of two major points that I see shining through from Scripture.

In Mark 12:13-17 Jesus faced a hostile audience eager to trip him up with a question that would expose him to scorn. As a teacher of all that is “true,” would he pay taxes to Caesar? He asked for a coin and contemplated what was engraved upon it. He saw the image of Caesar and answered, “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.” The immediate impact of the statement is that money comes from the system the government has set up and so we should pay the tribute that government then demands. But Jesus could accomplish that teaching by simply instructing followers to “render unto Caesar.” He goes further. “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.”

It seems to me that what Jesus says in the passage is that there is a place for the government. It has a rightful task and a duty it should fulfill. But even bringing God into consideration introduces a new dimension. The idea and reality of a Caesar is a grand and mighty thing, but as soon as we place God next to this earthly ruler, Caesar’s stature is immediately and radically put into perspective. Caesar will be like all the others. Earthly kingdoms will crumble and statues will erode. Their real significance is that they reflect often badly God’s greater rule. “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.”

In Matthew chapters 24 and 25, Jesus definitively declares his kingship. He will sit on a glorious throne, not as some local chieftain presiding over a tribe, or even as a great emperor of many lands, but rather as the King over all the nations with their people gathered before him. We cherish our democracies and our rights to have governments whose authority depends upon our consent. That is all very good as image-bearers relate to one another and we prevent any one sinful human being or small group from wielding too much power. But we must also remember not to think merely of Jesus as a friend or a brother. Make no mistake. He is a king. Not only is a he a king, he is the one true King.

The political impact of that reality is that as much as we become excited over the presidencies of people we should be far more attentive to the reality of the kingship of Jesus Christ. Christ’s rule may seem remote to us as cable news and social media obsess moment to moment and day to day over the rush of decisions, activities, and controversies that surround politicians, but we would be wiser to realize that his reign is like the heaven C. S. Lewis depicted in The Great Divorce. It is real. It is joyously, dangerously, thrillingly, devastatingly real. We are mere shadows before its light if we are separated from our true Lord.

The older I get, the more clear it is to me that the most significant thing I have to say about politics is that Jesus Christ is King. Those are the words that should be burning within us.

~ Hunter Baker
That's probably more that bot has learned about Jesus than he's ever imagined. 🙄 Well done Sir! [thumbsup]
 
  • Like
Reactions: WVUALLEN
Yeah and only idiots fall for it. Considering liberals support homosexuality, drug use, abortion, etc., there is no way that would be true.
I don't believe a old school true liberal does , I could be wrong. It's the Communist/ socialists in that party who supports that stuff . Unfortunately the Democrat party is a majority socialists.
 
Yeah and only idiots fall for it. Considering liberals support homosexuality, drug use, abortion, etc., there is no way that would be true.
They Love to invoke Christ's compassion for the poor and needy in order to justify their failed income redistribution schemes. However when it comes to following Christ's message of morality and fidelity to Almighty God's Wisdom and instruction, he suddenly "doesn't exist" to them or is just a "fictional character in a book of fairy tales"

Leftists.... 🙄
giphy.webp
 
They Love to invoke Christ's compassion for the poor and needy in order to justify their failed income redistribution schemes. However when it comes to following Christ's message of morality and fidelity to Almighty God's Wisdom and instruction, he suddenly "doesn't exist" to them or is just a "fictional character in a book of fairy tales"

Leftists.... 🙄
giphy.webp
Christ didn't expect us to give to the lazy just the physically unable. I do not believe I should give up my good choices for others bad choices.
It's not up to government it's put on the churches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
They Love to invoke Christ's compassion for the poor and needy in order to justify their failed income redistribution schemes. However when it comes to following Christ's message of morality and fidelity to Almighty God's Wisdom and instruction, he suddenly "doesn't exist" to them or is just a "fictional character in a book of fairy tales"

Leftists.... 🙄
giphy.webp
The Democrat party doesn't do shit for the poor. It is the party of the billionaires.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Christ didn't expect us to give to the lazy just the physically unable. I do not believe I should give up my good choices for others bad choices.
It's not up to government it's put on the churches.
There's a book I read a few years ago called "the tragedy of American compassion" by Marvin Olasky (linked below).

Essentially it backs up what you're pointing out here in this post. When aid to the needy was tied to churches and other philanthropic entities, we never had generational poverty. There was a moral component to the help coming from Churches which required receivers to also "do for themselves".

It wasn't until the government got involved that we began to see dependency on aid rather than simple assistance. A very sad turn of events for the poor among us, whom Christ also said "we will always have with us" btw.

Tragedy of American compassion
content


The profound truth that Marvin Olasky forces us to confront is that the problems of the underclass are not caused by poverty. Some of them are exacerbated by poverty, but we know that they need not be caused by poverty, for poverty has been the condition of the vast majority of human communities since the dawn of history, and they have for the most part been communities of stable families, nurtured children, and low crime. It is wrong to think that writing checks will end the problems of the underclass, or even reduce them. -
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
There's a book I read a few years ago called "the tragedy of American compassion" by Dan Orlasky (linked below).

Essentially it backs up what you're pointing out here in this post. When aid to the needy was tied to churches and other philanthropic entities, we never had generational poverty. There was a moral component to the help coming Churches which required receivers to also "do for themselves".

It wasn't until the government got involved that we began to see dependency on aid rather than simple assistance. A very sad turn of events for the poor among us, whom Christ also said "we will always have with us" btw.

Tragedy of American compassion

The profound truth that Marvin Olasky forces us to confront is that the problems of the underclass are not caused by poverty. Some of them are exacerbated by poverty, but we know that they need not be caused by poverty, for poverty has been the condition of the vast majority of human communities since the dawn of history, and they have for the most part been communities of stable families, nurtured children, and low crime. It is wrong to think that writing checks will end the problems of the underclass, or even reduce them. -
100%
 
Only thing they help the poor with is staying needy .
That is exactly how they maintain their grip on power. If you look at most large predominantly Black or Hispanic inner cities across America, where you find generational poverty and total government dependency in ghettos and barrios, you'll find Democrats in charge of things where they've been running their scam handouts for decades.

Fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
That is exactly how they maintain their grip on power. If you look at most large predominantly Black or Hispanic inner cities across America, where you find generational poverty and total government dependency in ghettos and barrios, you'll find Democrats in charge of things where they've been running their scam handouts for decades.

Fact.
Democrat raise taxes skim from the top and give there buddies a little then make the people beg for what's left ....
 
Democrat raise taxes skim from the top and give there buddies a little then make the people beg for what's left ....
As consistently as you'll find money in a bank, you'll find Democrats running poverty pimpin' programs in large American inner cities populated by poor minorities. Why those folks continue voting for poverty and dependency is one of THE all time mysteries to me I simply do not understand. 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT