on Earth! First off, who knows who out recruited who, how do we know with any degree of certainity which schools truly offered a kid a ride....Secondly who knows if any of these kids will pan out, if you sign 15 , odds are 5 will never see the field, 5 might play some, 5 might be good players who make significant contribution...but on signing day, we never know which of the three catagories they will fit under. Just a total crap shoot!
Recruiting "smack"...perhaps the most inane exercise
- Thread starter Tonycried
- Start date
They have rankings for it. 29 versus 65 isn't very close. I'm really surprised you didn't pick up a single 4*.
I hate to agree iwth you, especially since that's not what this board is for.
I totally agree with that statement though ... to a degree anyway. When talking recruiting I immediately go back to Gwaltney and Slaton. Gwaltney was a 5*, his signing day was broadcast on ESPN, but it was Slaton that became the star and made it to the NFL.
I think it's safe to say that a class full of 5*s is going to pan out better than a class of 2*s 99.99% of the time, but that doesn't mean that a particular 2* won't end up being better than a particular 5*.
The thing is, Doc may get a 4 star or two of the ones that aren't eligible. It's what they live on.
When the P5 schools decides to grant teams may take in a limited amount of props, that's likely to happen soon, that will kill off the Moou's of the college sports world. Back to being a Div AA type program.
But you think ranking a team who didn't beat anyone worth a damn in fifteen years is an exact science?!?
Got hypocrisy?
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Got hypocrisy?
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Re: OMG, the sky is fallin! Hahahahahahahhaha*
You don't need to recruit well when you play a schedule of teams mostly ranked 100+.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
You don't need to recruit well when you play a schedule of teams mostly ranked 100+.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
