ADVERTISEMENT

Nunes memo was 100% correct

atlkvb

Heisman Winner
Gold Member
Jul 9, 2004
74,940
40,338
698
*reviving this post from almost 4 years ago...just as a reminder what phony, fake, dishonest frauds our friends on the Left are:

On Febrary 2, 2018 Devin Nunes issued a scathing indictment accusing the Obama DOJ, the IC, the DNC, & Hillary campaign of weaponizing the nation's FISA laws against President Trump and his campaign.

At the time many on the Left claimed his findings were wrong or only politically motivated. Since that time, more facts have emerged, revealing that ALL of the major contentions made by Nunes were 100% correct! Following is a list of all the claims he made in that memo on Febrary 2nd, and the facts revealed to date which have supported each one.

The final corroborating proof will be provided by the unredacted documents President Trump is currently declassifying, further exposing the lawlessness, web of lies, criminal conspiracy and deceit among the principles involved in this attempt to undermine a Presidential campaign and a sitting US President.

Everything listed here is now 100% confirmed fact based on what we now know and has been proven to date. The de classified documents will simply support and further confirm these established facts of criminal activity and unconstitutional behavior on the part of the participants.

  • 1st claim in the memo...Both the DOJ and the FBI petitioned the FISA court to begin to surveil a Trump campaign advisor (Carter Page)on October 21st 2016 - just two and a half weeks before the election.

  • 2nd claimThe application had to be certified by the FBI's Director or DeputyDirector & The AG, Deputy AG, or Assistant AG to the NSA.

  • 3rd claim...The initial warrant on Carter Page was issued & renewed three times (every 90 days) - which now takes you through the campaign, the election, the President-elect period and early days as President

  • 4th claim...FBI Director James Comey singed three warrants

  • 5th claim...Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe signed one

  • 6th claim...Deputy AG, Sally Yates signed at least one

  • 7th claim...Deputy AG, Dana Boenta signed at least one

  • 8th claim...Deputy AG, Rod Rosenstein signed at least one

  • 9th claim...Christopher Steele was an FBI source
So, what was it that was used as the basis for these FISA warrants?

Cited as quote "essential" to the warrant process...The Steele Dossier? Anyone disputing this was presented to the FISA court?

  • 10th claim Christopher Steele was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign to create it via Perkins Coie & Fusion GPS - Anyone disputing this?

  • 11th claim the purpose was to obtain "derogatory information" on Trump ties to Russia - Anyone disputing this?

  • 12th claim - the funding of the dossier by the DNC & Clinton Campaign was never disclosed to the FISA court - What about that one?

  • 13th claim - The DOJ and FBI officials who signed off on it knew that the DNC & Clinton Campaign paid for it to be created - Any takers on that one?

  • 14th claim - The FISA requests left the sourcing of the dossier out of the warrant request, despite knowing it was Fusion GPS...

  • 15th claim - The FBI authorized an additional payment to Christopher Steele for the dossier - Is that not true?

  • 16th claim - On September 23rd of 2016 Yahoo News ran a story linking Carter Page to Moscow that was used in the FISA requests as corroborating evidence

  • 17th claim - Christopher Steele leaked the story to Yahoo News

  • 18th claim - the FISA request asserts that Steele wasn't the source of the Yahoo story

  • 19th claim - In a British court Christopher Steele cited that he was the source of the Yahoo News story

  • 20th claim - Perkins Coie - the DNC & Clinton law firm used for the Dossier funding was aware of the Steele leak

  • 21st claim - Perkins Coie held a meeting with Steele and Fusion GPS after the leak to discuss the matter

  • 22nd claim - Steele was suspended and fired after revealing he was an FBI source to Mother Jones on October 30th

  • 23rd claim - After being fired by the FBI he maintained contact with the Justice Department - specifically Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr and senior officials who were directly reported to Deputy AG's Salley Yates and later Rod Rosenstein

  • 24th claim - In September of 2016 Christopher Steele told Deputy AG Bruce Ohr "was desperate that Donald Trump not be elected"

  • 25th claim - Deputy AG Bruce Ohr's Wife was employed during this time by Fusion GPS to cultivate the dossier

  • 26th claim- Deputy AG Bruce Ohr provided his Wife's research, paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign to the FBI

  • 27th claim - Deputy AG Bruce Ohr's Wife's role was never disclosed to the FISA court

  • 28th claim - FBI Counter-intelligence Assistant Director Bill Priestap cited the dossier investigation as only being in its quote "infancy" at the time of the initial FISA warrant request

  • 29th claim - FBI Director James Comey offered a summation of the dossier to President-Elect in January of 2017 Trump despite its lack of corroboration.

  • 30th claim - Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe testified in December of 2017 that the warrants wouldn't have been issued without the Dossier
Source:http://www.theglobaldispatch.com/br...confirmed-or-revealed-in-the-fisa-memo-12826/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
@Boomboom521 has never responded to this post. NEVER. He's never admitted he was 100% dead wrong about the Nunes memo, and he's never owned up to the fact that Hillary and the DNC illegally spied on the Trump campaign in order to falsely accuse them of "collusion" with the Russians to steal the '16 election.

Matter of fact, no one on the Left has ever admitted to any of this either. Neither has anyone in the media which pedaled this phony fake scam for damn near 3 years. No one in the media has ever gone back and broke down the Nunes memo like this, or pointed out that he was 100% correct in his findings.

This is why no one on the Left of this forum has any credibility with me. They all believed the collusion story...all of 'em. Yet none of 'em have ever admitted they were wrong. Not one of 'em.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wvu2007
@Boomboom521 has never responded to this post. NEVER. He's never admitted he was 100% dead wrong about the Nunes memo, and he's never owned up to the fact that Hillary and the DNC illegally spied on the Trump campaign in order to falsely accuse them of "collusion" with the Russians to steal the '16 election.

Matter of fact, no one on the Left has ever admitted to any of this either. Neither has anyone in the media which pedaled this phony fake scam for damn near 3 years. No one in the media has ever gone back and broke down the Nunes memo like this, or pointed out that he was 100% correct in his findings.

This is why no one on the Left of this forum has any credibility with me. They all believed the collusion story...all of 'em. Yet none of 'em have ever admitted they were wrong. Not one of 'em.
He believes Adam Schiff was correct. Need to put those 2 memos side by side
 
all these traitors should be in Gitmo awaiting the gallows...
 
@Boomboom521 has never responded to this post. NEVER. He's never admitted he was 100% dead wrong about the Nunes memo, and he's never owned up to the fact that Hillary and the DNC illegally spied on the Trump campaign in order to falsely accuse them of "collusion" with the Russians to steal the '16 election.

Matter of fact, no one on the Left has ever admitted to any of this either. Neither has anyone in the media which pedaled this phony fake scam for damn near 3 years. No one in the media has ever gone back and broke down the Nunes memo like this, or pointed out that he was 100% correct in his findings.

This is why no one on the Left of this forum has any credibility with me. They all believed the collusion story...all of 'em. Yet none of 'em have ever admitted they were wrong. Not one of 'em.
There is a great chasm between belief and acceptance. But the libs have that gap covered.. Any bad report of anything Trump Was/is/forever will be accepted as truth by the left...
 
There is a great chasm between belief and acceptance. But the libs have that gap covered.. Any bad report of anything Trump Was/is/forever will be accepted as truth by the left...
Yup...you are 100% correct. They put mental blinders on whenever Trump's name is mentioned, because they're simply consumed with hatred for him. Nothing he ever says or does will be justified in their eyes and anything done against him, doesn't matter if it's illegal or not...it's justified in their eyes.

You've nailed it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
There is a great chasm between belief and acceptance. But the libs have that gap covered.. Any bad report of anything Trump Was/is/forever will be accepted as truth by the left...
That guy (@Boomboom521 ) has lost all credibility with me (if he ever had any in the first place)

Zero.

All throughout '17 and '18 he argued constantly for justification at least behind the illegal snooping, if not the actual charge of Trump "colluding" with the Russians to steal the '16 election from Hillary. While many us us pointed out the obvious weakness in the Democrat charges, he was one of the few on here at least admitting he was willing to wait and hear all the evidence before passing a judgement one way or the other.

When evidence of Democrat malfeasance was presented to him, he'd always have a "yeah but" argument insisting on relying only on provable facts. He boasted that once all the facts came out, he'd willingly accept them and admit Trump got scammed. He especially trashed the Nunes memo, calling it "a partisan hit job".

Well fast forward four years now. The facts have revealed Nunes was 100% correct. Mueller's investigation found no collusion, and no obstruction. Recently, John Durham's investigation revealed Hillary both knew of and directed the planting of fake evidence along with complicity from the FBI to justify the illegal spying operation on Trump!

Unreal.

All of those facts are now known. yet @Boomboom521 has virtually vanished offering not one response to any of them, quite contrary to what he boasted he'd do once all the facts of the case were known. Tells me he was nothing but a fake, phony, fraud, a Democrat shill, a pretend "unbiased" political observer interested only in the provable facts and above the partisan rancor being spewed on both sides. :rolleyes:

Bohunk.

He turned out to be nothing more than just another unapologetic, myopic, brain dead, Leftist political hack...I reposted this thread as proof of it.

@Boomboom521 congratulating himself for his "unbiased" political observations
giphy.gif

'at-a-boy-boomboom!!!!



14642.jpg

iu
 
Just adding this to the thread revival...as further proof how FOS @Boomboom521 was on this fake phony "view all the facts" façade he put on during that whole fake phony collusion scam.

I think the Russian thing, for me, is the real key in this discussion. If it’s a fabricated bs affair, my faith in certain news outlets, the Democratic Party, and of course the DOJ will be a breath away from dead.

If there is however, reason found for the intense concern over potential campaign efforts being coordinated with the Russian Government, I think a lot of the coverage was warranted.

For the record boom boom has never pronounced his "faith" in the Democrat party, the DOJ or MSM dead, even though they all dutifully carried on with the whole farce and have never retracted one word of their dishonest lies and deceit! Neither has he FWIW.

giphy.gif

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT