Newsmax Slaps Very Awkward Note On Screen During Donald Trump Interview

[moe]

Even MAGA propaganda channels have to protect themselves from Trump lies.

Newsmax Slaps Very Awkward Note On Screen During Donald Trump Interview

Conservative network Newsmax appeared to pre-empt Donald Trump’s possible repetition of his baseless 2020 election fraud claims during the former president’s live telephone interview on Tuesday.

“Please Note: Newsmax accepts the 2020 election results as legal and final,” read a chyron that appeared on screen during the presumptive GOP presidential nominee’s conversation with guest host Corey Lewandowski, his 2016 campaign manager.

 

[Airport]

Even MAGA propaganda channels have to protect themselves from Trump lies.

Newsmax Slaps Very Awkward Note On Screen During Donald Trump Interview

Conservative network Newsmax appeared to pre-empt Donald Trump’s possible repetition of his baseless 2020 election fraud claims during the former president’s live telephone interview on Tuesday.

“Please Note: Newsmax accepts the 2020 election results as legal and final,” read a chyron that appeared on screen during the presumptive GOP presidential nominee’s conversation with guest host Corey Lewandowski, his 2016 campaign manager.

It’s called a disclaimer to prevent communist corp that owns the crooked voting machines from suing them. Biden could have won but no way he got 10 million more votes than the first affirmative action president.

 

[bornaneer]

Even MAGA propaganda channels have to protect themselves from Trump lies.

Newsmax Slaps Very Awkward Note On Screen During Donald Trump Interview

Conservative network Newsmax appeared to pre-empt Donald Trump’s possible repetition of his baseless 2020 election fraud claims during the former president’s live telephone interview on Tuesday.

“Please Note: Newsmax accepts the 2020 election results as legal and final,” read a chyron that appeared on screen during the presumptive GOP presidential nominee’s conversation with guest host Corey Lewandowski, his 2016 campaign manager.

NTTAWWT...What's your problem with what they did...You need to lighten up dude.

 

[moe]

NTTAWWT...What's your problem with what they did...You need to lighten up dude.

?? Biden doesn't need disclaimers but MAGA says, nothing to see here, keep moving.

 

[ThePunish-EER]

Even MAGA propaganda channels have to protect themselves from Trump lies.

Newsmax Slaps Very Awkward Note On Screen During Donald Trump Interview

Conservative network Newsmax appeared to pre-empt Donald Trump’s possible repetition of his baseless 2020 election fraud claims during the former president’s live telephone interview on Tuesday.

“Please Note: Newsmax accepts the 2020 election results as legal and final,” read a chyron that appeared on screen during the presumptive GOP presidential nominee’s conversation with guest host Corey Lewandowski, his 2016 campaign manager.

?? Biden doesn't need disclaimers but MAGA says, nothing to see here, keep moving.

Until an investigation is conducted and a judge agrees to hear the case, it will be nothing but speculation. As airport states, it’s only to protect themselves from a potential lawsuit. Although you struggle with this due to intellectual disability, this is pretty much common sense.

 

[MountaineerWV]

Until an investigation is conducted and a judge agrees to hear the case, it will be nothing but speculation. As airport states, it’s only to protect themselves from a potential lawsuit. Although you struggle with this due to intellectual disability, this is pretty much common sense.

Correct me if I'm wrong.....

1. There have been investigations by Republican groups to gather the "evidence".
2. The evidence your team presented to judges was dismissed because the "evidence" was merely speculation and inquiry.

 

[ThePunish-EER]

Correct me if I'm wrong.....

1. There have been investigations by Republican groups to gather the "evidence".
2. The evidence your team presented to judges was dismissed because the "evidence" was merely speculation and inquiry.

That is not true. These judges refused to hear the cases and dismissed them. Again, there has been no official investigation.

 

[moe]

By the numbers: President Donald Trump's failed efforts to overturn the election

Report: Trump commission did not find widespread voter fraud

 

[SoCo]

Correct me if I'm wrong.....

1. There have been investigations by Republican groups to gather the "evidence".
2. The evidence your team presented to judges was dismissed because the "evidence" was merely speculation and inquiry.

There are rules which preclude much of the evidence from being disseminated, even to the establishment's "investigators". It is the ultimate fox guarding the hen house.

Why is it our lotteries are drawn on live television with witnesses present and the elections are done in complete secrecy? The only way to ever prove a vote count is legitimate is to make it a public record.

 

[moe]

There are rules which preclude much of the evidence from being disseminated, even to the establishment's "investigators". It is the ultimate fox guarding the hen house.

Why is it our lotteries are drawn on live television with witnesses present and the elections are done in complete secrecy? The only way to ever prove a vote count is legitimate is to make it a public record.

Elections are run and monitored by both parties. You have nothing but cult beliefs inspired by the orange convict.

 

[Gunny46]

That is not true. These judges refused to hear the cases and dismissed them. Again, there has been no official investigation.

There are several tweets like this before they sit her down and explained things to her. I will add two points though. 1st anyone who thinks Putin wanted Trump to win hasn't been paying attention. Second anyone who doesn't think cheating occurred on a large scale in a few swing States during the Covid Mail in the Ballots cluster fvck is just being dishonest.

 

[Gunny46]

Elections are run and monitored by both parties. You have nothing but cult beliefs inspired by the orange convict.

Speaking of cults.

 

[MountaineerWV]

That is not true. These judges refused to hear the cases and dismissed them. Again, there has been no official investigation.

Why did they refuse and dismiss? Because "lack of real evidence". I'm not making this up, you can choose to close your eyes all you want and keep denying it. That is your right.

 

[ThePunish-EER]

Elections are run and monitored by both parties. You have nothing but cult beliefs inspired by the orange convict.

While that is supposed to occur, it did not occur in 2020. Election vote counts were stopped election night with the plan to resume the following day. They resumed at 2-3am without notice and both parties were not present.

 

[ThePunish-EER]

Why did they refuse and dismiss? Because "lack of real evidence". I'm not making this up, you can choose to close your eyes all you want and keep denying it. That is your right.

Because there was never an official investigation. Are you really this slow? Did Biden really get more black votes than the first black president Obama? Really?

 

[MountaineerWV]

Post-Election Cases Decided on the Merits:

• Trump v. Biden (Wis. Dec. 14, 2020) – In a 4-3 decision, the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed three of Trump’s four claims under the doctrine of laches. However, it decided on the merits Trump’s claim that voters wrongfully declared themselves indefinitely confined. Ultimately, the court ruled against Trump on this claim because Trump challenged the status of all voters who claimed an indefinitely confined status, rather than individual voters. Trump petitioned to the U.S. Supreme Court for writ of certiorari on Dec. 29, 2020 with a motion for expedited consideration, but the court denied his motion to expedite on January 11.
• Trump v. Wis. Elecs. Comm’n (E.D. Wis. Dec. 12, 2020) – The district court dismissed Trump’s claim that Wisconsin officials violated his rights under the Electors Clause because said officials allegedly issued guidance on state election statutes that deviated significantly from the requirements of Wisconsin’s election statutes. First, the court found that interpretations of election administration rules do not fall under the meaning of “Manner” in the Electors Clause. Moreover, even if “Manner” were read so broadly, the defendants had acted consistently with, and as expressly authorized by, the Wisconsin Legislature; their issued guidance did not significantly or materially depart from legislative direction. Thus, there was no violation of the Electors Clause. The U.S. Appeals Court for the 7th Circuit affirmed the district court’s opinion on Dec. 24, 2020. Trump filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 30, 2020 along with a motion for expedited consideration, and the court denied Trump’s motion to expedite on January 11.
• King v. Whitmer (E.D. Mich. Dec. 7, 2020) – While the district court stated that the claims of plaintiffs—Republican presidential electors—could be dismissed for lack of standing, the district court nonetheless analyzed the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims. First, the district court was unpersuaded by the plaintiffs’ claim that defendants violated the Elections and Electors Clauses by allegedly violating the Michigan Election Code because it found that deviations from state election law are not the same as modifications of state election law. Second, the district court found the plaintiffs’ Equal Protection claim to be too speculative, finding no evidence that physical ballots were altered. The plaintiffs filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 11, 2020, and subsequently filed a motion for expedited consideration on Dec. 18, 2020. However, the court denied the motion to expedite on January 11.
• Ward v. Jackson (Ariz. Sup. Ct., Maricopa Cnty. Dec. 4, 2020) – The superior court denied relief requested by the plaintiff in an election contest because the plaintiff failed to meet the evidentiary standard necessary for such a contest. First, plaintiff’s evidence failed to show fraud or misconduct—rather, it showed that the duplication process of the presidential election was 99.45% accurate, and that the inaccuracies were caused by human error. Moreover, the plaintiff’s evidence failed to show illegal votes or an erroneous vote count. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the superior court’s decision on Dec. 8, 2020. The plaintiff filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 11, 2020, and subsequently filed a motion for expedited consideration on the same day. However, the Court denied the motion to expedite on January 11.
• Law v. Whitmer (Nev. Dist. Ct., Carson City Dec. 4, 2020) – The district court dismissed the plaintiffs’ election contest on the merits. First, the plaintiffs—Republican presidential electors—failed to prove that there had been either a voting device malfunction or the counting of illegal/improper votes in a manner sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the election’s outcome. Next, the plaintiffs failed to prove that the election board or any of its members were guilty of malfeasance. Finally, the plaintiffs failed to prove that defendants had manipulated or altered the outcome of the election. The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s decision on Dec. 8, 2020.
• Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar (M.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2020) – While the district court found that Trump lacked standing, the court decided to touch upon the merits of his Equal Protection claim, ultimately rejecting the claim. The district court held that different counties implementing different types of notice-and-cure policies (many implementing none) did not violate the Equal Protection Clause because the clause does not require complete equality in all situations—“a classification resulting in ‘some inequality’ will be upheld unless it is based on an inherently suspect characteristic or ‘jeopardizes the exercise of a fundamental right.’” The district court highlighted the fact that the notice-and-cure policies adopted by certain counties imposed no burden on voters, and that it would be impossible to require every single county to administer elections in exactly the same way. The U.S. Court for Appeals for the 3rd Circuit affirmed this decision on Nov. 27, 2020.
• Wood v. Raffensperger (N.D. Ga. Nov. 20, 2020) – While the district court stated that the claims of a plaintiff—a registered voter—could be dismissed either for lack of standing or under the doctrine of laches, the court nonetheless ruled on the merits. First, the district court dismissed the plaintiff’s Equal Protection claim because there was no disparate treatment among Georgia voters. Next, the district court dismissed the plaintiff’s Elections and Electors Clauses claim because Secretary Brad Raffensperger had not overridden or rewritten any state law. Finally, the district court dismissed the plaintiff’s Due Process claim because there is no individual constitutional right to observe the electoral process (i.e., monitor an audit or vote recount). The U.S. Appeals Court for the 11th Circuit affirmed the district court’s opinion on Dec. 5, 2020. The plaintiff filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 8, 2020 and filed a motion for expedited consideration on the same day. However, the court denied the motion to expedite on January 11.
• Bower v. Ducey (D. Ariz. Dec. 9, 2020) – The district court largely dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint on the grounds of lack of standing. However, the court did touch upon the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims of fraud, ultimately finding that the plaintiffs’ claims were largely based on, “anonymous witnesses, hearsay, and irrelevant analysis of unrelated elections.” For one, the declarations from poll watchers that the plaintiffs provided as proof of fraud did not actually allege fraud at all, but rather simply raised concerns about the manner and process by which election officials matched signatures on absentee ballots. Moreover, none of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses stated that defendants committed any fraud; instead, they only provided speculative statements about what “could have” happened. Additionally, one of the plaintiffs’ experts relied on a study with no information about its author or methodologies involved. Finally, the court found the plaintiffs’ claim of alleged voting machine hacking to be unconvincing since the voting machines’ behavior could be easily explained by standard voting machine protocol. The plaintiffs filed an emergency petition for extraordinary writ of mandamus to the U.S. Supreme Court on Dec. 15, 2020, and the court denied the plaintiffs’ emergency petition on January 11.
• Costantino v. City of Detroit (3d Jud. Ct. Wayne Cnty. Nov. 13, 2020) – In denying the plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction, the court found that the plaintiffs’ claims of fraud would unlikely prevail on the merits. The court noted that many plaintiffs failed to include crucial information in their allegations, such as locations of alleged misconduct, frequency of alleged misconduct, names of those involved in alleged misconduct, and so on. Overall, the court found the plaintiffs’ claims of fraud to be speculative, filled with “guess-work,” and often unsubstantiated. Moreover, defendants provided a sufficient amount of evidence to convince the court that they had acted within the law. This decision was affirmed by the Michigan Court of Appeals on Nov. 16, 2020, and by the Michigan Supreme Court on Nov. 23, 2020.
• Arizona Republican Party v. Fontes (Ariz. Sup. Ct., Maricopa Cty.) – The superior court ordered the Arizona Republican Party and its lawyers to pay legal fees for bringing a “groundless,” bad faith lawsuit challenging Maricopa County election procedures. The court noted that the relief plaintiff sought—an additional hand count of ballots—was not legally available due to the suit’s numerous procedural defects. The court found that plaintiff did not adequately assess the validity of their claims before filing the suit, and thus failed to prove that the county had inappropriately applied the statute in question. The court determined that plaintiff brought the suit for the “improper purpose” of undermining Arizonans’ confidence in election results, rather than to defend election integrity as they claimed.

 

[Gunny46]

Correct because they are a cult and want to conqure you.

 

[MountaineerWV]

There are rules which preclude much of the evidence from being disseminated, even to the establishment's "investigators". It is the ultimate fox guarding the hen house.

Why is it our lotteries are drawn on live television with witnesses present and the elections are done in complete secrecy? The only way to ever prove a vote count is legitimate is to make it a public record.

So are you suggesting getting rid of the "secret ballot"?

 

[Gunny46]

What a hypocrite.

Former Vice President Joe Biden says he 'absolutely agrees' with comment that Trump is an 'illegitimate president'

During a campaign event in New Hampshire, former Vice President Joe Biden said he agreed that President Donald Trump is an "illegitimate president."

www.google.com

Former Vice President Joe Biden says he 'absolutely agrees' with comment that Trump is an 'illegitimate president'​

 

[Gunny46]

I think that pretty much covers this topic.

Biden 'absolutely' agrees with woman who blasts Trump presidency by calling it 'illegitimate'

Former Vice President Joe Biden, the frontrunner among 2020 Democratic candidates, told a woman at an event on Tuesday that he agreed with her after she stated that Donald Trump's presidency was "illegitimate."

www.google.com

JOE BIDEN

Biden 'absolutely' agrees with woman who blasts Trump presidency by calling it 'illegitimate'​

 

[SoCo]

Elections are run and monitored by both parties. You have nothing but cult beliefs inspired by the orange convict.

I didn't say anything about Republican vs Democrat. I have seen nothing to establish my vote, or the vote of anyone I know, was counted and counted correctly. And I know for a fact you have no evidence of your vote being counted correctly. Because they are not allowed to release that information.

I simply want to see the evidence so I can decide for myself if the election was legitimate. You just want to take someone else's word for it. It worked out weel for you with Russia collusion....

 

[Gunny46]

Biden has Demetia so let's cover her too

 

[ThePunish-EER]

I didn't say anything about Republican vs Democrat. I have seen nothing to establish my vote, or the vote of anyone I know, was counted and counted correctly. And I know for a fact you have no evidence of your vote being counted correctly. Because they are not allowed to release that information.

I simply want to see the evidence so I can decide for myself if the election was legitimate. You just want to take someone else's word for it. It worked out weel for you with Russia collusion....

Exactly! moetard still wants to believe this is a partisan issue and it’s not. This is the establishment protecting itself and its power and existence.

 

[Gunny46]

Now I'm just rubbing it in.

 

[moe]

I didn't say anything about Republican vs Democrat. I have seen nothing to establish my vote, or the vote of anyone I know, was counted and counted correctly. And I know for a fact you have no evidence of your vote being counted correctly. Because they are not allowed to release that information.

I simply want to see the evidence so I can decide for myself if the election was legitimate. You just want to take someone else's word for it. It worked out weel for you with Russia collusion....

paranoid​

adjective​

para·noid ˈper-ə-ˌnȯid
ˌpa-rə-

variants or less commonly paranoidal
ˌper-ə-ˈnȯi-dᵊl
ˌpa-rə-
Synonyms of paranoid
1 : characterized by or resembling paranoia or paranoid schizophrenia
a paranoid psychiatric patient

2 : characterized by suspiciousness, persecutory trends, or megalomania
behaving in a paranoid manner with accusations of persecutions

3 : extremely fearful
was so paranoid that he was afraid to walk the streets

​

 

[Gunny46]

paranoid​

adjective​

para·noid ˈper-ə-ˌnȯid
ˌpa-rə-

variants or less commonly paranoidal
ˌper-ə-ˈnȯi-dᵊl
ˌpa-rə-
Synonyms of paranoid
1 : characterized by or resembling paranoia or paranoid schizophrenia
a paranoid psychiatric patient

2 : characterized by suspiciousness, persecutory trends, or megalomania
behaving in a paranoid manner with accusations of persecutions

3 : extremely fearful
was so paranoid that he was afraid to walk the streets

​

Stop pretending you didn't read my post goofy.

 

[ThePunish-EER]

paranoid​

adjective​

para·noid ˈper-ə-ˌnȯid
ˌpa-rə-

variants or less commonly paranoidal
ˌper-ə-ˈnȯi-dᵊl
ˌpa-rə-
Synonyms of paranoid
1 : characterized by or resembling paranoia or paranoid schizophrenia
a paranoid psychiatric patient

2 : characterized by suspiciousness, persecutory trends, or megalomania
behaving in a paranoid manner with accusations of persecutions

3 : extremely fearful
was so paranoid that he was afraid to walk the streets

​

retard​

1 of 2

verb​

re·tard ri-ˈtärd

retarded; retarding; retards
Synonyms of retard
transitive verb
: to delay or impede the development or progress of : to slow up especially by preventing or hindering advance or accomplishment
chemicals to retard the spread of fire

intransitive verb
: to become delayed : to undergo retardation
retarder noun
retard
2 of 2

noun​

re·tard
plural retards
1
ri-ˈtärd : a holding back or slowing down : RETARDATION

2
ˈrē-ˌtärd offensive : a person affected with intellectual disability

3
ˈrē-ˌtärd informal + offensive : a

 

[Gunny46]

Sheeeeew.

 

[Gunny46]

 

[Shirley Knott]

Even MAGA propaganda channels have to protect themselves from Trump lies.

Newsmax Slaps Very Awkward Note On Screen During Donald Trump Interview

Conservative network Newsmax appeared to pre-empt Donald Trump’s possible repetition of his baseless 2020 election fraud claims during the former president’s live telephone interview on Tuesday.

“Please Note: Newsmax accepts the 2020 election results as legal and final,” read a chyron that appeared on screen during the presumptive GOP presidential nominee’s conversation with guest host Corey Lewandowski, his 2016 campaign manager.

What you see as a muzzle everybody else sees as a cover your ass statement

 

[atlkvb]

Until an investigation is conducted and a judge agrees to hear the case, it will be nothing but speculation. As airport states, it’s only to protect themselves from a potential lawsuit. Although you struggle with this due to intellectual disability, this is pretty much common sense.

If Biden was legitimately heading towards a "record" vote winning night on his own, why did they need to shut down ALL the vote counts in swing States he was losing badly in before he could be declared the record vote winning candidate? No one's ever explained that bit of illogic or worse, no one's ever looked into why ALL those vote counts were suddenly suspended just as Trump was set to win enough electoral votes to be declared the runaway winner.🤔

@moe

I've often wondered that myself, but I hate Trump so much I'm actually glad all those vote counts were shut down so all the extra "fake" votes creepy Joe needed to win could be added! I have no problem with any of that obvious fraud.

 

[ThePunish-EER]

If Biden was legitimately heading towards a "record" vote winning night on his own, why did they need to shut down ALL the vote counts in swing States he was losing badly in before he could be declared the record vote winning candidate? No one's ever explained that bit of illogic or worse, no one's ever looked into why ALL those vote counts were suddenly suspended just as Trump was set to win enough electoral votes to be declared the runaway winner.🤔

@moe

I've often wondered that myself, but I hate Trump so much I'm actually glad all those vote counts were shut down so all the extra "fake" votes creepy Joe needed to win could be added! I have no problem with any of that obvious fraud.

And why did they resume counts at 2-3am and not tell anyone? Who were these people counting? What was in the briefcases they brought with them? Why did they cover windows in Detroit or Philadelphia during the “counting”. What came of the “water leak” in Atlanta? What happened and why was there never any follow up. Why were there more ballots counted than registered voters in some places? Why did all the votes in the 2-3am counts all go to Biden? Is that possible? How did Biden get more black votes than the first black president? Why did they call Biden the winner in Virginia the night of the election with only 6-7% of the state vote tabulated? Why were voting processes changed in swing states like PA that broke their own state election laws? Why did some of these swing states keep receiving and counting ballots well after the election and only stop once Biden “won”? Why were state election representatives who refused to certify Michigan’s results threatened with jail time? Isn’t that their job? Why did the Jan 6 begin as soon as a certain state representative refused to certify his states election results during the electoral vote certification process? And why did he change his stance after the process resumed? Who orchestrated that? What were all the late night ballot box stuffers doing with stacks of ballots the night of election? Where did those come from? And why would one person have them at 3am?

 

[atlkvb]

And why did they resume counts at 2-3am and not tell anyone? Who were these people counting? What was in the briefcases they brought with them? Why did they cover windows in Detroit or Philadelphia during the “counting”. What came of the “water leak” in Atlanta? What happened and why was there never any follow up. Why were there more ballots counted than registered voters in some places? Why did all the votes in the 2-3am counts all go to Biden? Is that possible? How did Biden get more black votes than the first black president? Why did they call Biden the winner in Virginia the night of the election with only 6-7% of the state vote tabulated? Why were voting laws changed in swing states like PA that broke their own state election laws? Why did some of these swing states keep receiving and counting ballots well after the election and only stop once Biden “won”? Why were state election representatives who refused to certify Michigan’s results threatened with jail time? Isn’t that their job? Why did the Jan 6 begin as soon as a certain state representative refused to certify his states election results during the electoral vote certification process? And why did he change his stance after the process resumed? Who orchestrated that? What were all the late night ballot box stuffers doing with stacks of ballots the night of election? Where did those come from? And why would one person have them at 3am?

Why ask why? (all excellent questions btw)

You Trumpers are just jealous we pulled off something you all could never do! Just look how solid my support has been since the "heist"!

Yeah creepy Joe, just about all of those "record" 81 million voters you got in '20 can't wait to crawl over broken glass and vote for your absent minded ass again in '24 right? 😏

Hey I resent that shot atl!

And legitimate voters resent all the "fake" votes that were added to your otherwise mindless support 'ya creepy ass 'ol poopy pants!

 

[SoCo]

paranoid​

adjective​

para·noid ˈper-ə-ˌnȯid
ˌpa-rə-

variants or less commonly paranoidal
ˌper-ə-ˈnȯi-dᵊl
ˌpa-rə-
Synonyms of paranoid
1 : characterized by or resembling paranoia or paranoid schizophrenia
a paranoid psychiatric patient

2 : characterized by suspiciousness, persecutory trends, or megalomania
behaving in a paranoid manner with accusations of persecutions

3 : extremely fearful
was so paranoid that he was afraid to walk the streets

​

It isn't paranoia, it is the lack of trust. For damn good reason. The same government only recently acknowledged the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which resulted in nearly 60K dead Americans, was a hoax. After Russia collusion, Hunter's laptop, etc., only a fool would trust our government. But that's where you come in.

 

[atlkvb]

It isn't paranoia, it is the lack of trust. For damn good reason. The same government only recently acknowledged the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which resulted in nearly 60K dead Americans, was a hoax. After Russia collusion, Hunter's laptop, etc., only a fool would trust our government. But that's where you come in.

Hey, don't forget about me and my infamous "Covid" farce!

Oh nooooo phony Fauci! We'd NEVER forget about that giant scam! That was one for the ages 'ya shyster!!!!! 😏

 

[moe]

It isn't paranoia, it is the lack of trust. For damn good reason. The same government only recently acknowledged the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which resulted in nearly 60K dead Americans, was a hoax. After Russia collusion, Hunter's laptop, etc., only a fool would trust our government. But that's where you come in.

Cool story.

 

[Gunny46]

It isn't paranoia, it is the lack of trust. For damn good reason. The same government only recently acknowledged the Gulf of Tonkin incident, which resulted in nearly 60K dead Americans, was a hoax. After Russia collusion, Hunter's laptop, etc., only a fool would trust our government. But that's where you come in.

You know what wasn't a hoax? The CCP and Soviet Union spreading Communism in Korea and Vietnam. If only we had done more and really committed ourselves to destroying it then instead of partial measures. It's not like some of best Generals in WW2 didn't warn us

 

[ThePunish-EER]

You know what wasn't a hoax? The CCP and Soviet Union spreading Communism in Korea and Vietnam. If only we had done more and really committed ourselves to destroying it then instead of partial measures.

While that is a concern, they should’ve stopped communism here in the US. McCarthy tried telling everyone.

 

[atlkvb]

While that is a concern, they should’ve stopped communism here in the US. McCarthy tried telling everyone.

They've essentially taken over academia on College campuses. Entertainment media too!

 

[Gunny46]

While that is a concern, they should’ve stopped communism here in the US. McCarthy tried telling everyone.

Yes we should have which is how we got partial measures.