![[eyeroll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/rolleye/rolleye0011.r191677.gif "Eye roll [eyeroll]")
This is the glaring weakness with the line of thinking that filling the seat is bad b/c it will motivate the other side. There are few, if any, more powerful motivations than an up-for-grabs SCOTUS seat.
LOL, what are those gifs from?Hey atl, the Supreme Court isn't just about keeping innocent Babies alive, we got some firepower to protect with that 2nd amendment too!
Oops...almost forgot...
Yeah...sure Beto.....
The Left is so disingenuous they're trying to make this pick about preserving "health care" when they know it's only about killing babies. Since when does "health care" involve slaughtering innocent human beings? I am thrilled with the potential of this pick because it not only moves us closer to a long needed reversal of Roe v Wade, it will also expose the radical Left as the dishonest Baby killers they keep trying to hide from. If they're not for killing innocent perfectly healthy Babies why can't they all live?
Why do Leftists hate me and want to kill me?
If she was confirmed 80-15 ...was that by the Senate and if so how did Romney vote...??
Only the Senate votes on judicial nominations. I am almost certain that all no votes came from democrats.
Current proposal to go straight to vote on nomination w/o hearing(s). Not sure if hearings can be omitted, and I prefer hearings to further vet the nominee, but after Kavanaugh, not to mention Thomas and Bork, I understand if Cocaine Mitch skips them.
There were 15 people who voted no, all Dems. 5 abstained, all Dem candidates for Pres.
He can fly her back from Miami to DC for the announcement or make it there on Saturday...
