ADVERTISEMENT

'Massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy': GOP push revealed in under-the-radar hearing

moe

All-American
Gold Member
May 29, 2001
31,906
6,052
708
Fayetteville, WV
'Massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy': GOP push revealed in under-the-radar hearing

Republicans on the House's chief tax-writing committee made clear during a hearing Tuesday that their top priority is making permanent the massive giveaway to the rich that Donald Trump and the GOP pushed through in 2017.

Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said during his opening remarks at Tuesday's hearing that "we must make the Trump tax cuts permanent as soon as possible."

Smith characterized the 2017 tax cuts as a boon for ordinary Americans, but the law's benefits were heavily skewed to the wealthiest.

The same would be true of an extension of the individual tax cuts, which is expected to be part of a sprawling party-line reconciliation bill. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy noted in a recent analysis that "Trump's plan to make most of the temporary provisions of his 2017 tax law permanent would disproportionately benefit the richest Americans."
"No amount of misinformation can hide the truth: This massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations comes at the expense of working and middle-class Americans."

Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the committee, said at Tuesday's hearing that "when Republicans inevitably tell you that the GOP tax scam gave everyone in America a tax break, remember this one contextualized fact: Extending the law gives people making over $1 million a year a $78,717 average tax cut—288 times higher than the $273 those earning under $50,000 would receive."

"Those millionaires won't feel the effects of cuts to Medicare or Medicaid, or higher premium costs, but America's working families sure will," Neal added, referring to the GOP's plan to slash key aid programs to help offset the enormous cost of extending the 2017 tax breaks.


Tuesday's committee hearing was overshadowed by the closely watched Senate questioning of Trump's nominee to lead the Pentagon, but it confirmed that Republicans intend to waste no time delivering another round of tax cuts to rich Americans who saw their wealth explode under the 2017 law.

"The disastrous effects of the Trump tax scam are not theoretical—they're reality," Kass added. "It didn't raise wages for everyday people or protect our jobs and it certainly didn't pay for itself. Instead, it doubled billionaire wealth and added over $1.5 trillion to the deficit. No amount of misinformation can hide the truth: This massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations comes at the expense of working and middle-class Americans."

"If asked to choose between healthcare and food for low-income kids or tax cuts for giant corporations, Chairman Jason Smith and the Republicans on the Ways and Means Committee are proving that ten times out of ten, they'll choose the corporate giants," said Tony Carrk, executive director of the watchdog group Accountable.US. "American families are set up to lose because President-elect Trump and his congressional allies are eager to raise our costs in order to help their wealthy donor friends."
 
'Massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy': GOP push revealed in under-the-radar hearing

Republicans on the House's chief tax-writing committee made clear during a hearing Tuesday that their top priority is making permanent the massive giveaway to the rich that Donald Trump and the GOP pushed through in 2017.

Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said during his opening remarks at Tuesday's hearing that "we must make the Trump tax cuts permanent as soon as possible."

Smith characterized the 2017 tax cuts as a boon for ordinary Americans, but the law's benefits were heavily skewed to the wealthiest.

The same would be true of an extension of the individual tax cuts, which is expected to be part of a sprawling party-line reconciliation bill. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy noted in a recent analysis that "Trump's plan to make most of the temporary provisions of his 2017 tax law permanent would disproportionately benefit the richest Americans."
"No amount of misinformation can hide the truth: This massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations comes at the expense of working and middle-class Americans."

Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the committee, said at Tuesday's hearing that "when Republicans inevitably tell you that the GOP tax scam gave everyone in America a tax break, remember this one contextualized fact: Extending the law gives people making over $1 million a year a $78,717 average tax cut—288 times higher than the $273 those earning under $50,000 would receive."

"Those millionaires won't feel the effects of cuts to Medicare or Medicaid, or higher premium costs, but America's working families sure will," Neal added, referring to the GOP's plan to slash key aid programs to help offset the enormous cost of extending the 2017 tax breaks.


Tuesday's committee hearing was overshadowed by the closely watched Senate questioning of Trump's nominee to lead the Pentagon, but it confirmed that Republicans intend to waste no time delivering another round of tax cuts to rich Americans who saw their wealth explode under the 2017 law.

"The disastrous effects of the Trump tax scam are not theoretical—they're reality," Kass added. "It didn't raise wages for everyday people or protect our jobs and it certainly didn't pay for itself. Instead, it doubled billionaire wealth and added over $1.5 trillion to the deficit. No amount of misinformation can hide the truth: This massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations comes at the expense of working and middle-class Americans."

"If asked to choose between healthcare and food for low-income kids or tax cuts for giant corporations, Chairman Jason Smith and the Republicans on the Ways and Means Committee are proving that ten times out of ten, they'll choose the corporate giants," said Tony Carrk, executive director of the watchdog group Accountable.US. "American families are set up to lose because President-elect Trump and his congressional allies are eager to raise our costs in order to help their wealthy donor friends."
I’m sorry the Democrat influenced public educational system has failed you and you lack critical thinking and reasoning skills. It’s really a shame and I’m not joking.
 
'Massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy': GOP push revealed in under-the-radar hearing

Republicans on the House's chief tax-writing committee made clear during a hearing Tuesday that their top priority is making permanent the massive giveaway to the rich that Donald Trump and the GOP pushed through in 2017.

Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said during his opening remarks at Tuesday's hearing that "we must make the Trump tax cuts permanent as soon as possible."

Smith characterized the 2017 tax cuts as a boon for ordinary Americans, but the law's benefits were heavily skewed to the wealthiest.

The same would be true of an extension of the individual tax cuts, which is expected to be part of a sprawling party-line reconciliation bill. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy noted in a recent analysis that "Trump's plan to make most of the temporary provisions of his 2017 tax law permanent would disproportionately benefit the richest Americans."
"No amount of misinformation can hide the truth: This massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations comes at the expense of working and middle-class Americans."

Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the committee, said at Tuesday's hearing that "when Republicans inevitably tell you that the GOP tax scam gave everyone in America a tax break, remember this one contextualized fact: Extending the law gives people making over $1 million a year a $78,717 average tax cut—288 times higher than the $273 those earning under $50,000 would receive."

"Those millionaires won't feel the effects of cuts to Medicare or Medicaid, or higher premium costs, but America's working families sure will," Neal added, referring to the GOP's plan to slash key aid programs to help offset the enormous cost of extending the 2017 tax breaks.


Tuesday's committee hearing was overshadowed by the closely watched Senate questioning of Trump's nominee to lead the Pentagon, but it confirmed that Republicans intend to waste no time delivering another round of tax cuts to rich Americans who saw their wealth explode under the 2017 law.

"The disastrous effects of the Trump tax scam are not theoretical—they're reality," Kass added. "It didn't raise wages for everyday people or protect our jobs and it certainly didn't pay for itself. Instead, it doubled billionaire wealth and added over $1.5 trillion to the deficit. No amount of misinformation can hide the truth: This massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations comes at the expense of working and middle-class Americans."

"If asked to choose between healthcare and food for low-income kids or tax cuts for giant corporations, Chairman Jason Smith and the Republicans on the Ways and Means Committee are proving that ten times out of ten, they'll choose the corporate giants," said Tony Carrk, executive director of the watchdog group Accountable.US. "American families are set up to lose because President-elect Trump and his congressional allies are eager to raise our costs in order to help their wealthy donor friends."
Please go take your nap.
 
Bottom 50% of taxpayers pay almost nothing, they should pay closer to 25% of all fed taxes
 
Bottom 50% of taxpayers pay almost nothing, they should pay closer to 25% of all fed taxes
A serious question. What would you consider bottom? I've always considered myself bottom/ middle middle class depending on the year . Seams I'm never getting back what I pay in . And people all around me are getting more than they pay in .
I'm thinking I'm that group of people who are getting analyzed by everyone
Make to much for hand outs but not enough for relief ( KY jelly) ....
Above and beyond all things moe is either completely gullible or a troll....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Airport
A serious question. What would you consider bottom? I've always considered myself bottom/ middle middle class depending on the year . Seams I'm never getting back what I pay in . And people all around me are getting more than they pay in .
I'm thinking I'm that group of people who are getting analyzed by everyone
Make to much for hand outs but not enough for relief ( KY jelly) ....
Above and beyond all things moe is either completely gullible or a troll....

In 2023, those U.S. households reported a median income of $80,610, up 4% from $77,540 in 2022. That means half of households reported less income, and half reported more. In other words, any household that made more than $80,610 ranks among the top 50% nationally.Sep 21, 2024
https://www.fool.com/investing/2024...U.S. households,among the top 50% nationally.

Here's the Income You Need to Be in the Top 50% of ...

If you make less most likely you get back as much as you pay when you file your taxes. If you make even less, don't exactly know what the exact number is, you get back more than you pay. I hope you are in the upper 25%
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
'Massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy': GOP push revealed in under-the-radar hearing

Republicans on the House's chief tax-writing committee made clear during a hearing Tuesday that their top priority is making permanent the massive giveaway to the rich that Donald Trump and the GOP pushed through in 2017.

Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said during his opening remarks at Tuesday's hearing that "we must make the Trump tax cuts permanent as soon as possible."

Smith characterized the 2017 tax cuts as a boon for ordinary Americans, but the law's benefits were heavily skewed to the wealthiest.

The same would be true of an extension of the individual tax cuts, which is expected to be part of a sprawling party-line reconciliation bill. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy noted in a recent analysis that "Trump's plan to make most of the temporary provisions of his 2017 tax law permanent would disproportionately benefit the richest Americans."
"No amount of misinformation can hide the truth: This massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations comes at the expense of working and middle-class Americans."

Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the committee, said at Tuesday's hearing that "when Republicans inevitably tell you that the GOP tax scam gave everyone in America a tax break, remember this one contextualized fact: Extending the law gives people making over $1 million a year a $78,717 average tax cut—288 times higher than the $273 those earning under $50,000 would receive."

"Those millionaires won't feel the effects of cuts to Medicare or Medicaid, or higher premium costs, but America's working families sure will," Neal added, referring to the GOP's plan to slash key aid programs to help offset the enormous cost of extending the 2017 tax breaks.


Tuesday's committee hearing was overshadowed by the closely watched Senate questioning of Trump's nominee to lead the Pentagon, but it confirmed that Republicans intend to waste no time delivering another round of tax cuts to rich Americans who saw their wealth explode under the 2017 law.

"The disastrous effects of the Trump tax scam are not theoretical—they're reality," Kass added. "It didn't raise wages for everyday people or protect our jobs and it certainly didn't pay for itself. Instead, it doubled billionaire wealth and added over $1.5 trillion to the deficit. No amount of misinformation can hide the truth: This massive new giveaway to the ultra-wealthy and giant corporations comes at the expense of working and middle-class Americans."

"If asked to choose between healthcare and food for low-income kids or tax cuts for giant corporations, Chairman Jason Smith and the Republicans on the Ways and Means Committee are proving that ten times out of ten, they'll choose the corporate giants," said Tony Carrk, executive director of the watchdog group Accountable.US. "American families are set up to lose because President-elect Trump and his congressional allies are eager to raise our costs in order to help their wealthy donor friends."
🖕
 
That's who put Trump in the WH.
Yes and they're the ones that Trump and his billionaire pals are going to take a dump on. Let's see how the middle class and poor folks are doing after another 4 years of the clown show. They were so sick of it last time they elected Joe Biden.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bornaneer
Yes and they're the ones that Trump and his billionaire pals are going to take a dump on. Let's see how the middle class and poor folks are doing after another 4 years of the clown show. They were so sick of it last time they elected Joe Biden.
What's funny, dems shit on everybody except their marxist friends
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: moe and bornaneer
In 2023, those U.S. households reported a median income of $80,610, up 4% from $77,540 in 2022. That means half of households reported less income, and half reported more. In other words, any household that made more than $80,610 ranks among the top 50% nationally.Sep 21, 2024
https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/09/21/income-to-be-in-top-50-american-households-by-age/#:~:text=In 2023, those U.S. households,among the top 50% nationally.

Here's the Income You Need to Be in the Top 50% of ...

If you make less most likely you get back as much as you pay when you file your taxes. If you make even less, don't exactly know what the exact number is, you get back more than you pay. I hope you are in the upper 25%
Yeah I'm screwed
Seems government rewards but choices in the name of compassion. Pisses me off that my good choices have to pay for others bad choices.
 
Yeah I'm screwed
Seems government rewards but choices in the name of compassion. Pisses me off that my good choices have to pay for others bad choices.
It went on to say that if you are retired then the parameters change somewhat. I was very blessed to get into dental sschool, I wasn't the last pick but close to it. @polar80 was probably the first pick, unlike the pickup basketball games in dental school.
 
It went on to say that if you are retired then the parameters change somewhat. I was very blessed to get into dental sschool, I wasn't the last pick but close to it. @polar80 was probably the first pick, unlike the pickup basketball games in dental school.
I'd bet had you not got into dental school you would have still been successful. I don't have a problem helping those who CANT help themselves but people make choices then expect others to carry them along . I choose to travel so I can make more money and work more hours. Guys who choose not to work the hrs I do still get what I get, they get it from government. The child tax credit is socialists to its core . I got a vasectomy so I could afford college for my kids others have 5 or 6 kids then get my taxes back and cry they can't pay for college. ... point being government needs to get out of helping the poor at the extent it's in .
 
I'd bet had you not got into dental school you would have still been successful. I don't have a problem helping those who CANT help themselves but people make choices then expect others to carry them along . I choose to travel so I can make more money and work more hours. Guys who choose not to work the hrs I do still get what I get, they get it from government. The child tax credit is socialists to its core . I got a vasectomy so I could afford college for my kids others have 5 or 6 kids then get my taxes back and cry they can't pay for college. ... point being government needs to get out of helping the poor at the extent it's in .
I would hope I would have but I appreciate the fact I got to do what I did. I volunteered for over 20 years at the Bradley free clinic and the mission of mercy here in Roanoke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
It went on to say that if you are retired then the parameters change somewhat. I was very blessed to get into dental sschool, I wasn't the last pick but close to it. @polar80 was probably the first pick, unlike the pickup basketball games in dental school.
Come on Jack, I'm 6'5", I was always the first pick in basketball. 🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: Airport
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT